Review Series
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have become an essential drug class for treating type 2 diabetes, offering proven benefits in glycemic control, weight reduction, and cardiovascular and renal protection. However, growing evidence of heterogeneity in GLP-1RA treatment effects highlights the potential for developing precision medicine approaches to more accurately allocate GLP-1RAs to maximize patient benefit. In this Review, we explore the evidence for treatment effect heterogeneity with GLP-1RAs, focusing on clinical and genetic factors that robustly influence established therapeutic outcomes. We also highlight the potential of recent predictive models that integrate routine clinical data with personalize treatment decisions, comparing GLP-1RA to other major type 2 diabetes drug classes. While such models have shown considerable promise in identifying optimal type 2 diabetes treatment based on glycemic response, their utility for informing treatment choice for other clinical outcomes remains largely unexplored.
Authors
Pedro Cardoso, John M. Dennis, Ewan R. Pearson
Abstract
Historically, antiobesity medications have been modestly effective at best, with side-effect profiles that limit compliance and often preclude the long-term therapy required to maintain weight loss. Recently developed therapies based on analogs of the gut hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) have transformed the medical management of obesity, leading both to a degree of weight loss that rivals bariatric surgery and a reduction in morbidity and mortality associated with obesity-related complications. GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) therapies were developed to mimic the peripheral effects of GLP-1, but it is now well established that their efficacy in the treatment of obesity depends on reducing energy intake through their action in the central nervous system (CNS). Recent data indicate that the aversive gastrointestinal side effects of GLP-1RAs are also CNS mediated. Although a complete understanding of the neural circuits underlying GLP-1RA–induced weight loss remains elusive, a great deal has been learned in recent years. This Review summarizes proposed gut-brain and central mechanisms through which GLP-1 and its synthetic analogs regulate food intake and bodyweight.
Authors
Lisa R. Beutler
Abstract
The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is a class B1 G protein–coupled receptor and major therapeutic target in type 2 diabetes and obesity. Beyond its canonical role in Gαs/cAMP signaling, GLP-1R is increasingly recognized as an organizer of spatiotemporally defined signaling nanodomains, or “signalosomes.” This Review highlights our current knowledge on the mechanisms of assembly and regulation of GLP-1R signalosomes, including the involvement of biomolecular condensates formed by liquid-liquid phase separation, and the role of membrane contact sites between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and other organelles as key locations for GLP-1R signaling assemblies. Furthermore, we discuss existing data on the molecular composition and functional impact of two predicted GLP-1R nanodomains, one at ER–plasma membrane contact sites, where GLP-1R might interact with ion channels and transporters to influence local excitability and coordinated insulin secretion, and another at ER–mitochondria membrane contact sites, with the capacity to control lipid and calcium signaling and modulate ER and/or mitochondrial activity. We additionally discuss the role of GLP-1R posttranslational modifications as critical modulators of GLP-1R signal specification and nanodomain organization. Conceptualizing GLP-1R as a dynamic architect of spatiotemporally encoded signalosomes opens new avenues for a deeper understanding of incretin biology with the potential for identification of novel GLP-1R effectors and the development of refined therapeutic strategies for metabolic disease.
Authors
Gregory Austin, Alejandra Tomas
Abstract
Therapies based on glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) reduce rates of cardiovascular and chronic kidney disease in people with type 2 diabetes and/or obesity, with ongoing clinical trials investigating their effects in people with metabolic liver disease, arthritis, and both substance use and neurodegenerative disorders. Acute and chronic activation of GLP-1 receptor signaling also reduces systemic and tissue inflammation in mice and humans, through weight loss–dependent and –independent mechanisms, actions that may contribute to the expanding spectrum of clinical benefits ascribed to GLP-1 medicines. In this Review, we highlight current understanding of the direct and indirect antiinflammatory effects and mechanisms of GLP-1 medicines in both preclinical and clinical studies, covering emerging concepts, clinical relevance, and areas of uncertainty that require further investigation.
Authors
Chi Kin Wong, Daniel J. Drucker
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) was initially considered to be a hormone with a predominant role in regulating glucose metabolism by inducing insulin secretion, reducing glucagon secretion, and ameliorating insulin resistance, with the last effect being largely dependent on the induction of weight loss. In more recent years, the role of this peptide beyond metabolism has progressively been explored, including its impact on kidney physiology and kidney clinical outcomes in people with obesity with or without diabetes. Indeed, despite only modest expression of the GLP-1 receptor in the kidney, the renoprotective actions of GLP-1 and its receptor agonists have become an area of intensive investigation. This Review appraises the current status of GLP-1 peptide and its receptor agonists and focuses on the preclinical as well as recent seminal clinical findings defining the kidney benefits conferred by GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment in people living with type 2 diabetes and obesity.
Authors
Mark E. Cooper, Daniël H. van Raalte
Abstract
Cancer diagnoses are prevalent in people with obesity and type 2 diabetes, and abundant clinical evidence supports the protective effects of weight loss for cancer prevention. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have revolutionized obesity and type 2 diabetes medicine and alleviate many comorbidities of these metabolic diseases. In this Review, we summarize the current clinical evidence for GLP-1 receptor agonists and cancer risk, including thyroid, pancreatic, gastrointestinal, and hormone-dependent malignancies. With few exceptions, recent meta-analyses report that GLP-1 receptor therapies do not increase cancer incidence and may lower risk in some cases. Preclinical studies reinforce the anticancer effects of GLP-1 receptor therapies, even in non-obese models. However, there are still many opportunities for translational insight as the field grows. Immune-modulating effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists are reported in several preclinical cancer studies, which may reflect direct action on immune cells or result from improved metabolic function. We highlight ongoing clinical trials for GLP-1 receptor therapies in cancer patients, and offer considerations for preclinical studies, including perspectives on the timing and duration of GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment, concurrent use of standard anticancer therapies, and interpretation of models of cancer risk versus progression.
Authors
Estefania Valencia-Rincón, Rajani Rai, Vishal Chandra, Elizabeth A. Wellberg
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a devastating disease, due in part to its diagnosis frequently being made at an advanced stage. Ongoing efforts are aimed at identifying early-stage PC in high-risk individuals, as early detection leads to downstaging of PC and improvements in survival. However, there are a myriad of challenges that arise when trying to optimize PC early detection strategies, including selection of the appropriate high-risk individuals and selection of the test or combination of tests that should be performed. Here, we discuss the populations that are the strongest candidates for PC screening and review professional PC screening guidelines. We also summarize the current state of imaging techniques for early detection of PC and further review many studied biomarkers — ranging from nucleic acid targets, proteins, and the microbiome — to highlight the current state of the field and the challenges that remain in the years to come.
Authors
Michael J. Shen, Arsia Jamali, Bryson W. Katona
Abstract
The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining intestinal homeostasis and influencing various aspects of host physiology, including immune function. Recent advances have highlighted the emerging importance of the complement system, particularly the C3 protein, as a key player in microbiota-host interactions. Traditionally known for its role in innate immunity, the complement system is now recognized for its interactions with microbial communities within the gut, where it promotes immune tolerance and protects against enteric infections. This Review explores the gut complement system as a possibly novel frontier in microbiota-host communication and examines its role in shaping microbial diversity, modulating inflammatory responses, and contributing to intestinal health. We discuss the dynamic interplay between microbiota-derived signals and complement activation, with a focus on the C3 protein and its effect on both the gut microbiome and host immune responses. Furthermore, we highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting complement pathways to restore microbial balance and treat diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. By elucidating the functions of the gut complement system, we offer insights into its potential as a target for microbiota-based interventions aimed at restoring intestinal homeostasis and preventing disease.
Authors
Xianbin Tian, Lan Zhang, Xinyang Qian, Yangqing Peng, Fengyixin Chen, Sarah Bengtson, Zhiqing Wang, Meng Wu
Abstract
The complement system has emerged as a critical regulator of intestinal homeostasis, inflammation, and cancer. In this Review, we explore the multifaceted roles of complement in the gastrointestinal tract, highlighting its canonical and noncanonical functions across intestinal epithelial and immune cells. Under homeostatic conditions, intestinal cells produce complement that maintains barrier integrity and modulates local immune responses, but complement dysregulation contributes to intestinal inflammation and promotes colon cancer. We discuss recent clinical and preclinical studies to provide a cohesive overview of how complement-mediated modulation of immune and nonimmune cell functions can protect or exacerbate inflammation and colon cancer development. The complement system plays a dual role in the intestine, with certain components supporting tissue protection and repair and others exacerbating inflammation. Intriguingly, distinct complement pathways modulate colon cancer progression and response to therapy, with novel findings suggesting that the C3a/C3aR axis constrains early tumor development but may limit antitumor immunity. The recent discovery of intracellular complement activation and tissue-specific complement remains vastly underexplored in the context of intestinal inflammation and colon cancer. Collectively, complement functions are context- and cell-type-dependent, acting both as a shield and a sword in intestinal diseases. Future studies dissecting the temporal and spatial dynamics of complement are essential for leveraging its potential as a biomarker and therapeutic in colon cancer.
Authors
Carsten Krieg, Silvia Guglietta
Abstract
The complement system is an evolutionarily conserved host defense system that has evolved from invertebrates to mammals. Over time, this system has become increasingly appreciated as having effects beyond purely bacterial clearance, with clinically relevant implications in transplantation, particularly lung transplantation. For many years, complement activation in lung transplantation was largely focused on antibody-mediated injuries. However, recent studies have highlighted the importance of both canonical and noncanonical complement activation in shaping adaptive immune responses, which influence alloimmunity. These studies, together with the emergence of FDA-approved complement therapeutics and other drugs in the pipeline that function at different points of the cascade, have led to an increased interest in regulating the complement system to improve donor organ availability as well as improving both short- and long-term outcomes after lung transplantation. In this Review, we provide an overview of the when, what, and how of complement in lung transplantation, posing the questions of: when does complement activation occur, what components of the complement system are activated, and how can this activation be controlled? We conclude that complement activation occurs at multiple stages of the transplant process and that randomized controlled trials will be necessary to realize the therapeutic potential of neutralizing this activation to improve outcomes after lung transplantation.
Authors
Hrishikesh S. Kulkarni, John A. Belperio, Carl Atkinson
No posts were found with this tag.
Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)