Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Feb 2023)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Selective ablation of basophils in mice reveals their nonredundant role in acquired immunity against ticks
Takeshi Wada, … , Naohiro Watanabe, Hajime Karasuyama
Takeshi Wada, … , Naohiro Watanabe, Hajime Karasuyama
Published July 26, 2010
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2010;120(8):2867-2875. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI42680.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Selective ablation of basophils in mice reveals their nonredundant role in acquired immunity against ticks

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Ticks are ectoparasitic arthropods that can transmit a variety of microorganisms to humans and animals during blood feeding, causing serious infectious disorders, including Lyme disease. Acaricides are pharmacologic agents that kill ticks. The emergence of acaricide-resistant ticks calls for alternative control strategies for ticks and tick-borne diseases. Many animals develop resistance to ticks after repeated infestations, but the nature of this acquired anti-tick immunity remains poorly understood. Here we investigated the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying acquired resistance to Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks in mice and found that antibodies were required, as was IgFc receptor expression on basophils but not on mast cells. The infiltration of basophils at tick-feeding sites occurred during the second, but not the first, tick infestation. To assess the requirement for basophil infiltration to acquired tick resistance, mice expressing the human diphtheria toxin receptor under the control of the mast cell protease 8 (Mcpt8) promoter were generated. Diphtheria toxin administration to these mice selectively ablated basophils. Diphtheria toxin–mediated basophil depletion before the second tick infestation resulted in loss of acquired tick resistance. These data provide the first clear evidence, to our knowledge, that basophils play an essential and nonredundant role in antibody-mediated acquired immunity against ticks, which may suggest new strategies for controlling tick-borne diseases.

Authors

Takeshi Wada, Kenji Ishiwata, Haruhiko Koseki, Tomoyuki Ishikura, Tsukasa Ugajin, Naotsugu Ohnuma, Kazushige Obata, Ryosuke Ishikawa, Soichiro Yoshikawa, Kaori Mukai, Yohei Kawano, Yoshiyuki Minegishi, Hiroo Yokozeki, Naohiro Watanabe, Hajime Karasuyama

×

Figure 1

IgFc receptors on mast cells are dispensable for antibody-mediated, protective immunity against ticks.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
IgFc receptors on mast cells are dispensable for antibody-mediated, prot...
(A) C57BL/6 and (B) C57BL/6-KitW-sh/W-sh mice were infested with larval H. longicornis ticks once or twice at an interval of 14 days. The relative tick repletion in each experimental group is shown, in that the value in the first infestation was defined as 100%. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 5 (A); n = 4 (B). (C) BMMCs derived from wild-type mice were adoptively transferred to KitW-sh/W-sh mice, and the recipient mice were infested and analyzed as in A. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 3 each. (D) μMT and (E) Fcer1g–/– C57BL/6 mice were infested with ticks as in A, and the relative tick repletion in each group is shown. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 5 (D); n = 4 (E). (F) BMMCs derived from Fcer1g–/– mice were adoptively transferred to KitW-sh/W-sh mice, and the recipient mice were infested and analyzed as in A. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, n = 3 each. Data shown in A–F are representative of at least 3 repeated experiments. **P < 0.01.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts