Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Aging (Upcoming)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • Gut-Brain Axis (Jul 2021)
    • Tumor Microenvironment (Mar 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Distinct growth hormone receptor signaling modes regulate skeletal muscle development and insulin sensitivity in mice
Mahendra D. Mavalli, … , Marcas M. Bamman, Thomas L. Clemens
Mahendra D. Mavalli, … , Marcas M. Bamman, Thomas L. Clemens
Published October 1, 2010
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2010;120(11):4007-4020. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI42447.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Endocrinology

Distinct growth hormone receptor signaling modes regulate skeletal muscle development and insulin sensitivity in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Skeletal muscle development, nutrient uptake, and nutrient utilization is largely coordinated by growth hormone (GH) and its downstream effectors, in particular, IGF-1. However, it is not clear which effects of GH on skeletal muscle are direct and which are secondary to GH-induced IGF-1 expression. Thus, we generated mice lacking either GH receptor (GHR) or IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) specifically in skeletal muscle. Both exhibited impaired skeletal muscle development characterized by reductions in myofiber number and area as well as accompanying deficiencies in functional performance. Defective skeletal muscle development, in both GHR and IGF-1R mutants, was attributable to diminished myoblast fusion and associated with compromised nuclear factor of activated T cells import and activity. Strikingly, mice lacking GHR developed metabolic features that were not observed in the IGF-1R mutants, including marked peripheral adiposity, insulin resistance, and glucose intolerance. Insulin resistance in GHR-deficient myotubes derived from reduced IR protein abundance and increased inhibitory phosphorylation of IRS-1 on Ser 1101. These results identify distinct signaling pathways through which GHR regulates skeletal muscle development and modulates nutrient metabolism.

Authors

Mahendra D. Mavalli, Douglas J. DiGirolamo, Yong Fan, Ryan C. Riddle, Kenneth S. Campbell, Thomas van Groen, Stuart J. Frank, Mark A. Sperling, Karyn A. Esser, Marcas M. Bamman, Thomas L. Clemens

×

Figure 1

GH-induced myoblast proliferation and fusion are mediated by IGF-1 production and intersect the NFATc2/IL-4 pathway.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
GH-induced myoblast proliferation and fusion are mediated by IGF-1 produ...
(A) Primary mouse myoblasts were serum starved for 10 hours before stimulation with GH. Real-time PCR was performed using primers for IGF-1 at indicated times. (B) Myoblasts were serum starved for 10 hours before stimulation with GH or IGF-1 for 8 hours, with BrdU exposure for the full 8 hours of treatment. The percentage of BrdU-positive cells was assessed by flow cytometry. (C) Myoblasts were induced to differentiate and treated with GH for 0–48 hours, 0–24 hours, or 24–48 hours of differentiation. (D) GHR-floxed myoblasts were infected with adenoGFP (control) or adenoCre (ΔGHR) and differentiated in the presence of vehicle, GH, or IGF-1 for 48 hours. (E) IGF-1R–floxed myoblasts were infected with adenoGFP (control) or adenoCre (ΔIGF-1R) as treated in D. (F) Wild-type myoblasts were serum starved for 10 hours before stimulation with vehicle (Veh), GH, or IGF-1 for 1 hour and harvest of nuclear protein extracts. (G) Myoblasts were transfected with an NFAT luciferase reporter construct before induction of differentiation for 24 hours and treatment with vehicle, ionomycin, GH, or IGF-1 for 5 hours. (H) Myoblasts were serum starved for 10 hours before treatment with vehicle or GH for 5 hours. Real-time PCR was performed using primers for IL-4. All data shown is representative of at least 3 separate experiments performed from separate muscle cell preparations. Error bars indicate SEM. *P < 0.05.

Copyright © 2022 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts