Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Rai1 duplication causes physical and behavioral phenotypes in a mouse model of dup(17)(p11.2p11.2)
Katherina Walz, … , Weimin Bi, James R. Lupski
Katherina Walz, … , Weimin Bi, James R. Lupski
Published November 1, 2006
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2006;116(11):3035-3041. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI28953.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Genetics

Rai1 duplication causes physical and behavioral phenotypes in a mouse model of dup(17)(p11.2p11.2)

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Genomic disorders are conditions that result from DNA rearrangements, such as deletions or duplications. The identification of the dosage-sensitive gene(s) within the rearranged genomic interval is important for the elucidation of genes responsible for complex neurobehavioral phenotypes. Smith-Magenis syndrome is associated with a 3.7-Mb deletion in 17p11.2, and its clinical presentation is caused by retinoic acid inducible 1 (RAI1) haploinsufficiency. The reciprocal microduplication syndrome, dup(17)(p11.2p11.2), manifests several neurobehavioral abnormalities, but the responsible dosage-sensitive gene(s) remain undefined. We previously generated a mouse model for dup(17)(p11.2p11.2), Dp(11)17/+, that recapitulated most of the phenotypes observed in human patients. We have now analyzed compound heterozygous mice carrying a duplication [Dp(11)17] in one chromosome 11 along with a null allele of Rai1 in the other chromosome 11 homologue [Dp(11)17/Rai1– mice] in order to study the relationship between Rai1 gene copy number and the Dp(11)17/+ phenotypes. Normal disomic Rai1 gene dosage was sufficient to rescue the complex physical and behavioral phenotypes observed in Dp(11)17/+ mice, despite altered trisomic copy number of the other 18 genes present in the rearranged genomic interval. These data provide a model for variation in copy number of single genes that could influence common traits such as obesity and behavior.

Authors

Katherina Walz, Richard Paylor, Jiong Yan, Weimin Bi, James R. Lupski

×

Figure 2

Genomic balance restores normal behavior.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Genomic balance restores normal behavior.
The results of 3 different par...
The results of 3 different parameters that were measured in the open-field paradigm (vertical activity, center/total distance, and total distance) are represented as bar graphs for each of the 4 genotypes tested. (A) Vertical activity [F(3, 46) = 26.9; P < 0.0001]. (B) Center/total distance ratio [F(3, 46) = 6.740; P = 0.001]. (C) Total distance (cm) [F(3, 46) = 4.260; P = 0.01]. Note that the abnormal vertical activity and center/total distance ratio observed in Dp(11)17/+ animals was normalized after restoration of genomic balance [i.e., Dp(11)17/Df(11)17]. Black bars, wild type; light gray bars, Dp(11)17/+; dark gray bars, Df(11)17/+; white bars, Dp(11)17/Df(11)17. Values represent mean ± SEM. Actual values are given in Supplemental Table 2. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared with wild-type littermate.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts