Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Host-directed immune therapies: a second front in the battle against sepsis
Richard S. Hotchkiss, Guillaume Monneret
Richard S. Hotchkiss, Guillaume Monneret
View: Text | PDF
Review

Host-directed immune therapies: a second front in the battle against sepsis

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Each year, sepsis claims more lives in the United States than many major cancers and HIV/AIDS combined, yet therapeutic progress has been modest. Adding to this crisis is the alarming rise of multidrug-resistant “superbugs,” which increasingly render conventional antibiotics ineffective. Pathogen-targeted antibiotics will always remain a cornerstone of sepsis treatment, and research into novel antibiotics must continue unabated. However, the consistent mortality in sepsis tells us this approach is insufficient. Most deaths in sepsis do not occur during the early cytokine storm–driven hyper-inflammatory phase but rather days or weeks after the initial insult, during a protracted phase of immune suppression. Here, we make the case that a crucial way to reduce sepsis mortality lies in restoration of the patient’s immune competence, enabling the patient to contain and kill the invading microbes. Adjuvant immune therapies will not only enable killing of the initial, invading pathogens but also prevent secondary, hospital-acquired infections. Immunotherapy revolutionized oncology by challenging the assumption that cancer was best treated through cytotoxic or targeted tumor-directed approaches, and sepsis now stands at a similar inflection point. We argue that embracing immune restoration as a core therapeutic objective offers the most promising means to improve survival in this lethal disorder.

Authors

Richard S. Hotchkiss, Guillaume Monneret

×

Usage data is cumulative from June 2026 through July 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 1,652 0
PDF 460 0
Figure 440 0
Table 211 0
Citation downloads 109 0
Totals 2,872 0
Total Views 2,872

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts