Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Viral targeting of hematopoietic progenitors and inhibition of DC maturation as a dual strategy for immune subversion
Noemí Sevilla, … , Stefan Kunz, Michael B.A. Oldstone
Noemí Sevilla, … , Stefan Kunz, Michael B.A. Oldstone
Published March 1, 2004
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2004;113(5):737-745. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI20243.
View: Text | PDF
Article Virology

Viral targeting of hematopoietic progenitors and inhibition of DC maturation as a dual strategy for immune subversion

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

DCs play a pivotal role in bringing forth innate and adaptive immune responses. Viruses can specifically target DCs, rendering them ineffective in stimulating T cells, which can ultimately lead to immunosuppression. In the present study we have identified several potential mechanisms by which lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) induces immunosuppression in its natural murine host. The immunosuppressive LCMV variant clone 13 (Cl 13) infects DCs and interferes with their maturation and antigen-presenting capacity as evidenced by a significant reduction in the surface expression of MHC class I, MHC class II, CD40, CD80, and CD86 molecules. Additionally, Cl 13 infects hematopoietic progenitor cells both in vivo and in vitro, impairing their development. One mechanism by which hematopoietic progenitors are developmentally impaired is through the Cl 13–induced production of IFN-α and IFN-β (IFN-α/β). Mice deficient in the receptor for IFN-α/β show a normal differentiation of progenitors into DCs despite viral infection. Thus, a virus can evolve a strategy to boost its survival by preventing the maturation of DCs from infected progenitor cells and by reducing the expression of antigen-presenting and costimulatory molecules on developed DCs.

Authors

Noemí Sevilla, Dorian B. McGavern, Chao Teng, Stefan Kunz, Michael B.A. Oldstone

×

Figure 2

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Splenic CD8α+ and CD8α– DCs do not expand after Flt3-L treatment in Cl 1...
Splenic CD8α+ and CD8α– DCs do not expand after Flt3-L treatment in Cl 13–infected mice. (A) Dot plots show double staining for CD11c and CD8α molecules on splenocytes from mice treated with Flt3-L or PBS, which was initiated at day 15 after infection. Boxes labeled a denote CD11c+CD8α– (myeloid) DCs, and boxes labeled b denote CD11c+CD8α+ (lymphoid) DCs. (B) The fold expansion of CD11c+CD8α+ (boxes labeled b) and CD11c+CD8α– (boxes labeled a) DCs is plotted for naive, Cl 13–infected, and ARM-infected mice, calculated as indicated in Methods. (C) DCs were isolated from spleens of mice that were treated with either PBS (filled squares) or Flt3-L (open triangles) for 15 days. The treatment began 5 days prior to infection and continued for an additional 10 days. Mice were sacrificed at days 0, 5, 10, and 15 after infection. Day 0 after infection corresponds to day 5 of Flt3-L treatment, and day 10 after infection represents the end of Flt3-L treatment. Flow cytometric analyses were performed to determine the number of splenic CD11c+CD8α– (myeloid) and CD11c+CD8α+ (lymphoid) DCs. The populations were gated as shown in Figure 3A. The absolute number of CD11c+CD8α– and CD11c+CD8α+ DCs are plotted for naive, ARM-infected, and Cl 13–infected mice. The data are representative of two independent experiments using nine mice per group. (D) The percentage of infected BMCs was calculated at days 3, 5, 7, and 15 after infection in Cl 13–infected (white bars) and ARM-infected (gray bars) mice. BMCs were harvested at the indicated timepoints, stained with an LCMV NP–specific antibody directly conjugated to Alexa 488, and analyzed by flow cytometry.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts