BACKGROUND Genetically engineered porcine livers are being developed as a bridge therapy for acute liver failure, providing detoxification and restoration of hepatic protein synthesis. Severe xenograft-associated thrombocytopenia remains a major limitation, and human mechanistic data are scarce.METHODS Platelet kinetics were characterized in 3 human decedents undergoing extracorporeal cross-circulation with transgenic porcine livers. Platelet counts, transfusion requirements, and clearance patterns were assessed to distinguish consumption from marrow suppression or hypersplenism. Antibody- and complement-directed inhibitors were administered to test immune-mediated mechanisms. Mechanistic studies focused on porcine von Willebrand factor–dependent (pVWF-dependent) platelet activation, including ex vivo blockade with the anti-VWF nanobody caplacizumab, a VWF-directed antibody fragment that prevents VWF-platelet binding. A fourth decedent received caplacizumab during porcine liver perfusion.RESULTS In all 3 initial cases, 80%–90% of circulating and transfused platelets were rapidly cleared, a pattern inconsistent with marrow suppression or hypersplenism. Antibody and complement inhibition failed to ameliorate thrombocytopenia. Recipient plasma induced robust pVWF-mediated platelet activation analogous to human type IIb von Willebrand disease, which was completely abrogated ex vivo by caplacizumab. In a fourth decedent treated with caplacizumab, aberrant platelet activation was prevented, although full hematologic recovery was limited by preexisting disseminated intravascular coagulation.CONCLUSIONS Early thrombocytopenia during porcine liver xenotransplantation appears to be primarily driven by pVWF-mediated platelet activation rather than by classical immune or splenic mechanisms. Targeted VWF blockade with agents such as caplacizumab may mitigate platelet loss and improve the safety profile of extracorporeal porcine liver support in acute liver failure.
Liang Zhao, Sokratis A. Apostolidis, Aae Suzuki, Amrita Sarkar, Qian Guo, Felix Li, Alex Sagar, John Fallon, Mohamed A. Elzawahry, Syed Hussain Abbas, Leanne Lanieri, Kristen Getchell, Susan C. Low, Kim M. Olthoff, Emma E. Furth, Brendan J. Keating, Peter Friend, Mortimer Poncz, Abraham Shaked, Charles S. Abrams
Usage data is cumulative from March 2026 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,098 | 0 |
| 453 | 0 | |
| Figure | 116 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 165 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 98 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,930 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,930 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.