Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Emerging therapeutic strategies in breast cancer (Oct 2026)
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Conflict of interest
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research ArticleInflammationMetabolismNephrology Open Access | 10.1172/JCI200755

Fumarate-induced succination of A-kinase anchor protein 12 exacerbates renal inflammation and fibrosis

Shuai Sun,1,2,3 Xu-yang Yan,2,3 Yu-hang Dong,4,5 Jian-min You,2,3 Zhen-yu Guo,2,3 Dong-xue Lv,4 Shuai-shuai Xie,4 Rui Hou,4 Xiang-yu Li,4 Ju-tao Yu,4 Xiao-yu Shen,4 Jie Wei,4 Zhen-yu Song,2,3 Zi-qi Chen,2,3 Yun-long Zhu,2,3 Xing-xin Xu,6 Juan Jin,4 Jia-gen Wen,4 Hao Wang,7 Xiao-ming Meng,4 and Wei Wang2,3

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Sun, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Yan, X. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Dong, Y. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by You, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Guo, Z. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Lv, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Xie, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Hou, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Li, X. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Yu, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Shen, X. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Wei, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Song, Z. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Chen, Z. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Zhu, Y. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Xu, X. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Jin, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Wen, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Wang, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Meng, X. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.

2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

3Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation, Institute of Urology;

4Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, the Key Laboratory of Anti-inflammatory of Immune Medicines, Ministry of Education, Anhui Institute of Innovative Drugs, School of Pharmacy; and

5Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

6Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

7Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Find articles by Wang, W. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Authorship note: SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY contributed equally to this work.

Published June 30, 2026 - More info

Published in Volume 136, Issue 14 on July 15, 2026
J Clin Invest. 2026;136(14):e200755. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI200755.
© 2026 Sun et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published June 30, 2026 - Version history
Received: September 30, 2025; Accepted: May 21, 2026
View PDF
Abstract

The inflammatory response resulting from the abnormal accumulation of metabolites has been implicated in the pathogenesis of organ fibrosis; however, its role and underlying mechanisms in renal fibrosis remain unclear. In this study, we observed a negative correlation between fumarate hydratase (FH) expression and the degree of renal fibrosis. Loss of FH function was associated with heightened inflammation and exacerbated tubulointerstitial damage in the kidney. Moreover, FH deficiency aggravated fibrosis in both the liver and lungs. Mechanistically, the depletion of FH in renal tubular cells led to fumarate accumulation. Fumarate directly succinated A-kinase anchoring protein 12 at cysteine 670, thereby diminishing its capacity to inhibit the activity of protein kinase Cζ (PKCζ). This process exacerbated renal inflammation and fibrosis by activating the downstream PKCζ/NF-κB and PKCζ/β-catenin pathways. Additionally, the upregulation of FH through adeno-associated virus 2/9–mediated FH overexpression markedly mitigated renal inflammation and fibrosis. These findings highlighted the important role of fumarate accumulation in the advancement of renal fibrosis, supporting FH as a potential therapeutic target in renal fibrosis.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by a progressive impairment of renal structure and function, resulting from various etiologies and posing a substantial threat to public health worldwide (1, 2). Approximately 10% of the global population is affected by CKD, and it is projected to become the fifth leading cause of death globally by 2040 (3, 4). Many patients with CKD ultimately progress to end-stage renal disease, necessitating renal replacement therapy or kidney transplantation, which places a heavy burden on families and society (5). Renal fibrosis is a common pathological feature and the final manifestation of CKD (6–8). Previous studies have shown that the activation and persistence of inflammation following damage to tubular epithelial cells (TECs) contribute to the progression of renal fibrosis (9–11). Despite extensive exploration, the specific mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, a deeper investigation into the mechanisms of inflammation activation and inadequate repair during renal fibrosis may provide promising treatment strategies to prevent or reverse kidney fibrosis.

Different from the previous perception that certain tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle metabolites primarily serve as intermediates in biosynthesis and energy supply, these metabolites also exert substantial biological effects in immune regulation and inflammatory responses by modulating transcription factors, modifying proteins, and altering cellular and molecular signaling pathways (12). Notable examples include succinate, which accumulates in the extracellular space and exhibits a pro-inflammatory role, thereby promoting liver fibrosis (13). In fibrotic kidneys, metabolic reprogramming in tubular cells leads to an energetic crisis and mitochondrial dysfunction, resulting in the abnormal accumulation of large quantities of metabolites (14, 15). However, the complex interplay between metabolite accumulation and inflammation regulation, as well as its implications for kidney fibrosis, remain largely unexplored.

Fumarate hydratase (FH) is an enzyme that plays multiple roles in the mitochondrial TCA cycle, the purine nucleotide cycle, DNA damage repair, and tumor suppression (16–18). In the TCA cycle, FH catalyzes the reversible conversion of fumarate to malate, and a deficiency in FH results in the abnormal accumulation of fumarate within cells (19). Loss-of-function mutations in FH are associated with hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (20). The role of fumarate as a modulator of inflammation has garnered increasing attention, with several studies highlighting its substantial involvement in innate immunity and inflammatory responses (21). In renal tubular cells, elevated levels of intracellular fumarate promote the release of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) into the cytoplasm, thereby activating the innate immune response (22). Clinical studies have shown that urinary fumarate levels are elevated in those with progressive CKD and may independently predict CKD progression beyond traditional cardiorenal risk factors (23). Moreover, in a mouse model of diabetic kidney disease, fumarate accumulated in both urine and kidney cortex. Treatment with a NOX1/NOX4 inhibitor increased FH expression, reduced fumarate accumulation, and attenuated diabetic glomerular dysfunction (24). However, the precise functions and mechanisms of fumarate in renal inflammation and fibrosis remain unclear.

In this study, we found that FH expression was reduced in fibrotic kidneys and was negatively correlated with CKD severity and the degree of renal fibrosis. In TECs, FH deficiency led to the accumulation of fumarate in the cytoplasm, which subsequently succinated A-kinase anchoring protein 12 (AKAP12) at cysteine 670. This process promoted the release and activation of protein kinase Cζ (PKCζ), thereby exacerbating renal inflammation and fibrosis through the PKCζ/NF-κB and PKCζ/β-catenin pathways. In preclinical models, adeno-associated virus 2/9–mediated (AAV2/9-mediated) FH overexpression markedly attenuated renal inflammation and fibrosis. We further found that FH deficiency promoted fibrosis in other organs. Together, these findings highlighted an important role for aberrant fumarate accumulation in the progression of renal inflammation and fibrosis and supported FH as a potential therapeutic target in renal fibrosis.

Results

Reduced FH expression is associated with renal fibrosis severity and kidney dysfunction. To investigate the involvement of FH in renal fibrosis, we initially conducted single-cell RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis using data from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Our analysis revealed that FH was downregulated in TECs in the unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) mouse model (Figure 1, A–C). To define the localization of FH expression in kidney tissue, we performed double immunofluorescence (IF) staining for FH and Lotus tetragonolobus lectin (LTL), a marker of proximal tubules. FH was predominantly expressed in proximal TECs and was reduced in kidney tissue from patients with hydronephrosis (Figure 1D). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Western blot analyses further showed that FH expression was markedly reduced in the kidney tissue from patients with hydronephrosis and CKD (Figure 1, E and G, and Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI200755DS1). FH expression was positively correlated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and negatively correlated with serum urea and creatinine levels, as well as the degree of renal fibrosis (Figure 1F and Supplemental Figure 1B).

FH expression is reduced in CKD and is associated with KLF9-mediated represFigure 1

FH expression is reduced in CKD and is associated with KLF9-mediated repression. (A) Uniform manifold approximation and projection plot showing distinct renal cell clusters in the public single-cell RNA-seq dataset NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) GSE140023. PT, proximal tubule; LOH, loop of Henle; CDT, convoluted distal tubule. (B and C) Feature plot and violin plot showing Fh1 expression in renal proximal TECs under sham, UUO 2-day, and UUO 7-day conditions. (D) Representative IF staining of FH and LTL in normal kidney and hydronephrotic kidney tissue. Scale bar, 100 μm. (E) Representative IHC staining of FH in human kidney tissue from healthy controls and patients with CKD stages 1–5 (n = 30). Scale bar, 100 μm. (F) Correlation analyses showing negative associations of FH-positive area with renal fibrosis area, serum urea, and serum creatinine, and a positive association with eGFR in human kidney samples (n = 23/30). (G) Western blot analysis of FH, α–smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and collagen I in kidney tissues from healthy controls and patients with hydronephrosis (n = 6). (H) Western blot analysis of α-SMA and collagen I in primary human renal TECs after TGF-β1 stimulation (n = 3). (I and J) Western blot analysis of FH, α-SMA, and collagen I in UUO and UIRI mouse models (n = 6). (K and L) Western blot analysis of FH, α-SMA, and collagen I in mTECs subjected to TGF-β1 or H/R treatment (n = 3). (M and N) qRT-PCR analysis of Klf9 and Fh1 mRNA expression at the indicated time points after TGF-β1 treatment (n = 3). (O) Western blot analysis of FH and KLF9 protein expression at the indicated time points after TGF-β1 treatment (n = 3). (P) Western blot analysis of FH protein expression after Klf9 knockdown (KD) in TGF-β1–stimulated mTECs (n = 3). (Q and R) ChIP assay showing increased KLF9 occupancy at the upstream regulatory region of Fh1 after TGF-β1 stimulation (n = 3). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman’s correlation analysis (F), 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (M and N), and 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (P and R). **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

Subsequently, we isolated primary human renal TECs from normal kidney tissue and found that TGF-β1 treatment reduced FH expression (Figure 1H and Supplemental Figure 1C). FH protein expression was also reduced in mouse models of renal fibrosis induced by UUO or unilateral ischemia/reperfusion injury (UIRI) (Figure 1, I and J, and Supplemental Figure 1, D–G). Similarly, in vitro fibrosis models induced by TGF-β1 or hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) showed reduced FH protein levels (Figure 1, K and L, and Supplemental Figure 1, H–J).

To identify candidate transcription factors potentially involved in Fh1 regulation, we performed an exploratory inspection of the genomic region upstream of the mouse Fh1 transcription start site using publicly available annotations in the UCSC Genome Browser. This inspection showed multiple annotated transcription factor–associated motifs across the upstream regulatory region (Supplemental Figure 2A). Among the annotated candidate transcription factors, B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL6), paired box 3 (PAX3), and Krüppel-like factor 9 (KLF9) were selected for further analysis based on published evidence linking them to renal pathophysiology. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis conducted in both UUO and UIRI mouse models demonstrated that Bcl6 expression was downregulated, Pax3 expression remained unchanged, and Klf9 expression was upregulated under injury conditions (Supplemental Figure 2, B–D). To prioritize these candidates functionally, we performed siRNA-mediated knockdown (KD) of Bcl6 and Klf9 in TGF-β1–treated TECs. Silencing Bcl6 had no detectable effect on Fh1 expression, whereas Klf9 KD partially restored both FH protein and Fh1 mRNA levels in the injured cells (Figure 1P and Supplemental Figure 2, E and F), supporting prioritization of KLF9 for further study.

KLF9 is a transcriptional repressor that can inhibit gene transcription by binding to GC-rich promoter elements (25, 26). In a TGF-β1–stimulated in vitro model, time course analyses demonstrated that Klf9 mRNA and KLF9 protein levels increased before the decline in FH expression (Figure 1, M–O, and Supplemental Figure 2G), consistent with an upstream regulatory role. Consistently, single-cell RNA-seq analysis of UUO kidneys revealed increased Klf9 expression specifically in TECs during fibrotic progression (Supplemental Figure 2, I and J), which was confirmed by increased KLF9 expression in fibrotic kidneys from UUO mice (Supplemental Figure 2H). Finally, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays demonstrated enhanced KLF9 occupancy at the upstream regulatory region of Fh1 in fibrotic kidneys (Figure 1, Q and R), supporting a role for KLF9 as a transcriptional regulator of Fh1 during renal fibrosis. In parallel, Western blot analyses revealed that KLF9 KD reduced the expression of multiple fibrosis- and inflammation-related markers (Supplemental Figure 2K), indicating that KLF9 plays a functional role in regulating renal inflammatory and fibrotic responses.

FH deficiency exacerbates UUO- and UIRI-induced renal injury and fibrosis. To investigate the functional role of FH in renal fibrosis, we generated Fh1-knockout mice using a CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing strategy targeting exons 3–9 of Fh1 (Figure 2A). Successful targeting was confirmed by PCR-based genotyping and agarose gel electrophoresis (Supplemental Figure 3, A and B). Consistent with Mouse Genome Informatics annotations, homozygous deletion of Fh1 resulted in early embryonic lethality, with embryos failing to progress beyond the egg cylinder stage (approximately embryonic day 6.0). Therefore, all subsequent experiments were performed using Fh1+/– mice. Assessment of baseline renal phenotypes revealed no significant differences in renal function or histological features between Fh1+/– mice and their wild-type (WT) littermates (Supplemental Figure 3, D–F). In contrast, IHC staining and Western blot analyses confirmed a marked reduction in FH protein expression in the kidneys of Fh1+/– mice compared with WT controls (Figure 2B and Supplemental Figure 3C).

Fh1+/– mice show exacerbated renal injury and fibrosis.Figure 2

Fh1+/– mice show exacerbated renal injury and fibrosis. (A) Schematic illustration of the Fh1-knockout strategy. Fh1+/–, Fh1 heterozygous. (B) Western blot analysis of FH in kidneys from Fh1+/+ and Fh1+/– mice. (C) Experimental design of the UUO model. (D) Representative PAS, Masson’s trichrome, and α-SMA IHC staining of kidneys from Fh1+/+ and Fh1+/– mice subjected to sham operation or UUO (n = 6). Scale bars, 50 μm. (E) Western blot analysis of α-SMA and collagen I in kidneys from Fh1+/+ and Fh1+/– mice after sham operation or UUO (n = 6). (F) Experimental design for FH overexpression (OE) rescue in Fh1+/– mice. (G) Representative Masson’s trichrome and α-SMA IHC staining of kidneys from WT mice, Fh1+/– mice, and Fh1+/– mice with FH OE after UUO (n = 6). Scale bar, 50 μm. (H) Western blot analysis of α-SMA and collagen I in kidneys from WT mice, Fh1+/– mice, and Fh1+/– mice with FH OE after UUO (n = 6). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test (B) and 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (D and E). **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

To assess the impact of the Fh1 deficiency on renal injury and fibrosis, we established a 7-day UUO model (Figure 2C). Periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) and Masson’s trichrome staining showed that renal injury and fibrosis were more pronounced in Fh1+/– mice compared with WT littermates (Figure 2D). IHC staining and Western blot analyses demonstrated increased expression of α-SMA and collagen I in Fh1+/– mice (Figure 2, D and E, and Supplemental Figure 3G), confirming that the absence of FH aggravated UUO-induced fibrosis. Additionally, we conducted a 21-day UIRI study in Fh1+/– mice and observed similar results. Fh1 deficiency exacerbated UIRI-induced kidney injury and fibrosis (Supplemental Figure 3H and Supplemental Figure 4A). To determine whether restoration of FH could rescue this phenotype, we utilized AAV2/9-mediated FH overexpression to restore FH expression in Fh1+/– mice and then induced UUO (Figure 2F). PAS, Masson’s trichrome, and IHC staining showed that restoration of FH reduced renal injury and fibrosis (Figure 2G and Supplemental Figure 4B). Western blot analyses further supported these findings (Figure 2H and Supplemental Figure 4C).

Proximal tubule–specific Fh1 conditional knockin attenuates UUO- and UIRI-induced renal injury and fibrosis. To further elucidate the role of FH in proximal TECs during renal fibrosis, we generated a proximal tubule–specific Fh1 conditional knockin (cKI) mouse model (Figure 3A). In this model, Fh1 FF mice carried a homozygous ROSA26-targeted Fh1 knock-in allele but did not express the transgene in the absence of Cre recombinase. In contrast, Fh1 cKI mice expressed Ggt1-Cre, enabling proximal TEC-specific activation of the knock-in Fh1 allele. All mice were genotyped using PCR followed by agarose gel electrophoresis (Figure 3B and Supplemental Figure 5A). IHC staining and Western blot analyses further confirmed successful generation of the Fh1 cKI mice (Supplemental Figure 5, B and C). Notably, Western blot revealed 2 FH protein bands: one corresponding to endogenous FH and the other to the 3×FLAG-tagged knock-in FH, consistent with the design of the cKI construct. Importantly, UUO markedly reduced FH protein levels in Fh1 FF kidneys. In contrast, FH expression in Fh1 cKI kidneys remained relatively preserved after injury compared with littermate controls, despite the overall suppressive effect of UUO on FH expression (Supplemental Figure 5D).

Conditional knockin of Fh1 in renal proximal tubules attenuates renal injurFigure 3

Conditional knockin of Fh1 in renal proximal tubules attenuates renal injury and fibrosis. (A) Schematic illustration of the conditional knockin (cKI) strategy for Fh1 expression in renal proximal tubules. (B) PCR-based genotyping of mice by agarose gel electrophoresis. (C) Experimental design for the UUO model. (D) Representative Masson’s trichrome and α-SMA IHC staining of kidneys from Fh1 FF and Fh1 cKI mice subjected to sham operation or UUO (n = 6). Scale bar, 50 μm. (E) Western blot analysis of α-SMA and collagen I in kidneys from Fh1 FF and Fh1 cKI mice after sham operation or UUO (n = 6). (F) Experimental design of the UIRI model. (G) Representative collagen I IHC staining of kidneys from Fh1 FF and Fh1 cKI mice subjected to sham surgery or UIRI (n = 6). Scale bar, 50 μm. (H) Western blot analysis of α-SMA and collagen I in kidneys from Fh1 FF and Fh1 cKI mice after sham operation or UIRI (n = 6). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (D, E, and H). ***P < 0.001.

In Fh1 cKI mice, UUO-induced tubular injury and extracellular collagen deposition were attenuated compared with Fh1 FF mice, as shown by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson’s trichrome staining (Figure 3, C and D, and Supplemental Figure 5E). Western blot and IHC analyses further showed reduced expression of α-SMA and collagen I in Fh1 cKI mice following UUO (Figure 3, D and E, and Supplemental Figure 5E). We next extended these findings to the UIRI model (Figure 3F). Consistently, proximal tubule–specific Fh1 cKI attenuated UIRI-induced kidney injury and fibrosis (Figure 3, G and H, and Supplemental Figure 6A).

FH regulates fibrotic responses in TGF-β1– and H/R-treated TECs. TEC injury plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of CKD (27). To validate the in vivo findings, we used siRNA transfection to silence Fh1 in murine tubular epithelial cells (mTECs) (Supplemental Figure 7A). qRT-PCR analysis and Western blot analyses confirmed that Fh1 siRNA reduced both Fh1 mRNA and FH protein levels (Supplemental Figure 7, B and C). Following TGF-β1 treatment, Acta2 and Col1a1 mRNA levels were increased in Fh1-KD cells compared with those transfected with control siRNA (Supplemental Figure 7D). Western blot and IF staining further showed that Fh1 KD increased α-SMA and collagen I protein expression (Supplemental Figure 7, E and F). Similar results were observed in the H/R-induced fibrogenesis model in mTECs (Supplemental Figure 7, G and H), supporting a role for Fh1 KD in promoting renal fibrogenic responses under TGF-β1 and H/R stimulation.

Subsequently, we overexpressed Fh1 in mTECs by plasmid transfection (Supplemental Figure 8A). qRT-PCR and Western blot analyses confirmed that Fh1 OE increased Fh1 mRNA and FH protein levels (Supplemental Figure 8, B and C). In parallel, qRT-PCR, Western blot, and IF staining showed that Fh1 OE reduced α-SMA and collagen I expression in TGF-β1– and H/R-stimulated mTECs (Supplemental Figure 8, D–H). We next treated the cells with an FH inhibitor (Supplemental Figure 9A). Compared with cells treated with TGF-β1 alone, FH inhibitor treatment increased α-SMA and collagen I protein expression (Supplemental Figure 9, B and C).

FH deficiency promotes renal inflammation. Recent studies have highlighted an important role for FH in innate immunity and inflammation (21, 22, 28). To investigate the mechanisms through which FH influences renal fibrosis, we conducted RNA-seq analysis (Figure 4A). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) showed that FH deficiency was associated with enrichment of inflammatory pathways, including NF-κB, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and interleukin-17 (IL-17) signaling (Figure 4, B–E). We next performed RNA-seq in Fh1-KD cells treated with TGF-β1 (Figure 4F). KEGG enrichment analysis showed that pathways upregulated following Fh1 KD in the fibrotic cell model were predominantly inflammatory, including PI3K/AKT and TNF signaling (Figure 4G and Supplemental Figure 10A). Together, these findings supported a role for FH loss in promoting inflammatory pathway activation during renal fibrosis.

FH deficiency exacerbates renal inflammatory responses.Figure 4

FH deficiency exacerbates renal inflammatory responses. (A) Schematic overview of the RNA-seq workflow. (B) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showing the top 10 upregulated pathways in Fh1-KD cells. (C–E) GSEA showing enrichment of NF-κB, IL-17, and TNF, signaling pathways in Fh1-KD cells. (F) Schematic overview of the RNA-seq workflow following TGF-β1 stimulation. (G) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showing the top 10 upregulated pathways in Fh1-KD cells after TGF-β1 treatment. (H and I) Western blot analysis of p-p65 in cells transfected with empty vector (EV), Fh1-OE, and Fh1-KD cells with or without TGF-β1 stimulation (n = 3). (J) Western blot analysis of p-p65 in kidneys from Fh1 FF and Fh1 cKI mice subjected to sham operation or UUO (n = 6). (K–M) qRT-PCR analysis of inflammatory gene expression in EV, Fh1-OE, and Fh1-KD cells with or without TGF-β1 treatment (n = 3) and in kidneys from Fh1 FF and Fh1 cKI mice after sham operation or UUO (n = 6). (N) Representative F4/80 IHC staining of kidneys from Fh1 FF and Fh1 cKI mice subjected to sham operation or UUO (n = 6). Scale bar, 50 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (K–N). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

To further examine the effect of FH on inflammatory signaling, we performed Western blot, which showed that Fh1 OE reduced NF-κB p65 phosphorylation (Figure 4H and Supplemental Figure 10B). Consistent with these findings, qRT-PCR analysis revealed that chemokine ligand 2 (Ccl2), Il6, and Tnfa mRNA levels were reduced in Fh1-OE cells (Figure 4K). Conversely, Fh1 KD increased NF-κB p65 phosphorylation and the expression of pro-inflammatory genes, including Ccl2, Il6, and Tnfa (Figure 4, I and L, and Supplemental Figure 10C). In the UUO model, Fh1 cKI mice showed reduced macrophage infiltration in the renal interstitium, decreased p65 phosphorylation, and lower expression of inflammatory genes (Figures 4, J, M and N, and Supplemental Figure 10D). In contrast, Fh1+/– mice showed increased macrophage infiltration and inflammatory cytokine expression (Supplemental Figure 10, E and F).

Fumarate accumulation promotes renal inflammation and fibrosis. FH catalyzes the reversible conversion of fumarate to malate (16). To determine whether FH deficiency was associated with fumarate accumulation during renal fibrosis, we measured fumarate levels in human samples and experimental models. In patients with CKD, serum and urinary fumarate levels were inversely correlated with eGFR (Figure 5A). Fumarate levels were also increased in the kidneys and serum of UUO mice (Figure 5B), as well as in an in vitro fibrosis model (Figure 5C). To test whether fumarate accumulation promoted renal inflammation and fibrosis, we treated cells with monomethyl fumarate (MMF), a cell-permeable fumarate derivative that increases intracellular fumarate levels without markedly altering its reactivity (22). In the fibrotic setting, MMF treatment increased α-SMA and collagen I protein expression and enhanced NF-κB p65 activation (Figure 5D and Supplemental Figure 11A). qRT-PCR analysis further showed that the mRNA levels of inflammatory genes increased with MMF treatment (Figure 5E). In TGF-β1–treated cells, Fh1 OE reduced inflammatory gene expression, whereas MMF administration reversed this effect (Figure 5G). Western blot analyses further showed similar results (Figure 5F and Supplemental Figure 11B). In vivo, mice administered MMF and then subjected to UUO developed more severe renal fibrosis and inflammatory responses than saline-treated controls, as shown by PAS, Sirius red, and IHC staining, as well as Western blot and qRT-PCR analyses (Figure 5, H–J, and Supplemental Figure 11, C–E). Together, these findings indicated that fumarate accumulation resulting from FH deficiency promoted renal inflammation and fibrosis.

Fumarate accumulation promotes renal inflammation and fibrosis.Figure 5

Fumarate accumulation promotes renal inflammation and fibrosis. (A) Spearman’s correlation analysis showing negative correlations between serum fumarate and eGFR (n = 30, r = –0.6440, P < 0.001) and between urinary fumarate and eGFR (n = 30, r = –0.5889, P < 0.001). (B) Fumarate levels in kidneys and serum from mice subjected to sham operation or UUO (n = 6). (C) Cystolic fumarate levels in mTECs treated with control, TGF-β1, or FH-IN-1 (n = 3). (D) Western blot analysis of α-SMA, collagen I, and p-p65 in cells treated with increasing concentrations of MMF with or without TGF-β1 stimulation (n = 3). (E) qRT-PCR analysis of Ccl2, Il6, and Tnfa expression under the same conditions as in D (n = 3). (F) Western blot analysis of α-SMA, collagen I, and p-p65 in EV, Fh1-OE, and Fh1-OE + MMF groups after TGF-β1 stimulation (n = 3). (G) qRT-PCR analysis of inflammatory gene expression in the same groups as in F (n = 3). (H) qRT-PCR analysis of inflammatory gene expression in kidneys from control and MMF-treated mice subjected to sham operation or UUO (n = 6). (I) Western blot analysis of α-SMA, collagen I, and p-p65 in kidneys from control and MMF-treated mice after sham operation or UUO (n = 6). (J) Representative Sirius red staining and IHC staining for α-SMA and F4/80 in kidneys from control and MMF-treated mice after sham operation or UUO (n = 6). Scale bar, 50 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman’s correlation analysis (A), 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test (B), 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (C, E, and G), and 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (H and J). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

Fumarate directly succinates AKAP12 at cysteine 670. As an electrophile metabolite, fumarate can undergo Michael addition with nucleophilic cysteine residues on proteins, resulting in formation of S-(2-succinyl) cysteine (2SC), a modification known as succination (29, 30). IHC staining showed increased 2SC levels in kidneys from Fh1-deficient mice subjected to UUO (Supplemental Figure 12A). We next used a desthiobiotin-iodoacetamide (DBIA) probe in a competitive cysteine-labeling strategy, coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), to identify candidate cysteine sites potentially modified by fumarate (Figure 6A). This analysis identified 26 high-confidence modification sites across 24 proteins (Figure 6, B and C). Based on prior RNA-seq results and their potential relevance to inflammatory signaling, IMPDH2, HSPBP1, and AKAP12 were prioritized for further analysis (Supplemental Figure 12, B–E). We then individually knocked down Impdh2, Hspbp1, and Akap12 by siRNA transfection (Supplemental Figure 12F). Among these candidates, Akap12 knockdown produced the most pronounced effect on fibrogenic responses in vitro (Supplemental Figure 12, G–I).

Fumarate promotes renal inflammation and fibrosis through succination of AKFigure 6

Fumarate promotes renal inflammation and fibrosis through succination of AKAP12 at C670. (A) Schematic illustration of the in vitro experimental design. (B) Volcano plot showing altered proteins and cysteine sites (Ctrl / Compd > 4, P < 0.05). Ctrl, control proteome; Compd, MMF-treated experimental proteome. (C) Hierarchical clustering heatmap showing differentially modified proteins and cysteine sites between control and fumarate-treated groups. (D) Molecular docking model predicting the interaction of fumarate with AKAP12 at C670 via Michael addition. (E) Western blot analysis showing reduced AKAP12 recovery in the FA-alkyne pulldown after MMF treatment (n = 3). (F) Western blot analysis of AKAP12 succination in cells treated with control, TGF-β1, MMF, or FH-IN-1 (n = 3). (G) Schematic diagram of plasmid construction for AKAP12 site-directed mutagenesis. (H) Western blot analysis of AKAP12 succination in AKAP12 WT and AKAP12 C670S cells with or without TGF-β1 treatment (n = 3). (I) Co-IP and Western blot analysis of AKAP12-PKCζ interaction and PKCζ phosphorylation in AKAP12 WT and AKAP12 C670S cells with or without TGF-β1 treatment (n = 3). (J) Western blot analysis of α-SMA, collagen I, p-IκB, p-P65, p-GSK-3β, and p-β-catenin in AKAP12 WT and AKAP12 C670S cells with or without TGF-β1 treatment (n = 3). (K) Representative IF images showing AKAP12–PKCζ colocalization in AKAP12 WT and AKAP12 C670S cells under the indicated conditions (n = 3). Scale bar, 10 μm.

AKAP12, also known as Src-suppressed C-kinase substrate, is a member of the A-kinase anchoring protein family (31, 32). It serves as a scaffold that anchors protein kinases, phosphatases, and other signaling molecules to specific subcellular compartments, thereby regulating intracellular signaling (33–35). However, its function in renal fibrosis remains unclear. Western blot and IF staining showed that Akap12 KD enhanced TGF-β1–induced expression of fibrotic markers (Supplemental Figure 12, J and K). Conversely, Akap12 OE attenuated these effects (Supplemental Figure 13, A and B). Molecular docking analysis using Schrödinger software predicted that fumarate could interact with AKAP12 at C670 via a Michael addition reaction, with a docking score of –6.169, supporting the possibility of succination at this site (Figure 6D). Consistently, exogenous fumarate treatment reduced AKAP12 enrichment in the FA-alkyne pulldown (Figure 6E). Moreover, treatment with TGF-β1, MMF, or FH-IN-1 increased AKAP12 succination, as assessed by 2SC immunoblotting (Figure 6F). Mutation of AKAP12 C670 from cysteine to serine markedly reduced its succination (Figure 6, G and H).

AKAP12 succination promotes renal inflammation and fibrosis through PKCζ/NF-κB and PKCζ/β-catenin signaling. AKAP12 has been reported to interact with PKCζ and restrain its activation (36, 37). PKCζ can promote NF-κB signaling through phosphorylation of IκB and p65 (38, 39). It has also been implicated in regulation of the GSK-3β/β-catenin axis during renal fibrosis (40). Western blot analyses showed that Fh1 KD in mTECs increased PKCζ phosphorylation and β-catenin expression, whereas Fh1 OE attenuated these changes (Supplemental Figure 13, C and D). Similar changes were observed in Fh1+/– and Fh1 cKI mice (Supplemental Figure 13, E and F). Consistent with our earlier findings, FH deficiency was also associated with activation of NF-κB signaling (Figure 4, H–M, and Supplemental Figure 10, B–E). Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assays showed that TGF-β1 stimulation reduced the interaction between AKAP12 and PKCζ while increasing PKCζ phosphorylation, and C670S mutation of AKAP12 partially reversed these effects (Figure 6I and Supplemental Figure 14A). Double IF staining further supported these findings (Figure 6K). Moreover, C670S mutation reduced phosphorylation of IκB, p65 and GSK-3β; promoted phosphorylation and degradation of β-catenin; and reduced expression of α-SMA and collagen I, as well as the expression of inflammatory genes (Figure 6J and Supplemental Figure 14, B–D). Together, these findings support a mechanism in which succination of AKAP12 at C670 weakens its interaction with PKCζ, thereby attenuating the inhibitory effect of AKAP12 on PKCζ activation and promoting PKCζ/NF-κB and PKCζ/β-catenin signaling, ultimately enhancing renal inflammation and fibrosis.

Akap12 C670S mutation attenuates UUO- and UIRI-induced renal inflammation and fibrosis. To further elucidate the functional role of the AKAP12 C670 site in renal inflammation and fibrosis, we generated a C57BL/6J mouse model harboring the Akap12 C670S mutation, designated as Akap12CS/CS, using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering (Figure 7, A and C). Akap12CS/CS mice showed no overt abnormalities compared with WT littermates. Assessment of baseline renal phenotypes revealed no significant differences in renal function or histological features between Akap12CS/CS mice and their WT littermates (Supplemental Figure 15, A–C).

Akap12CS/CS mice are protected against UUO-induced renal inflammation and fFigure 7

Akap12CS/CS mice are protected against UUO-induced renal inflammation and fibrosis. (A) Schematic illustration of the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated C670S mutation introduced into the mouse Akap12 locus. (B) Experimental design of the UUO model. (C) Representative Sanger sequencing traces confirming the Akap12CS/CS genotype. (D) Representative IHC staining for α-SMA, collagen I, and F4/80 in kidneys from WT and Akap12CS/CS mice subjected to sham operation or UUO (n = 6). Scale bar, 50 μm. (E) Western blot analysis of α-SMA and collagen I in kidneys from WT and Akap12CS/CS mice after sham operation or UUO (n = 6). (F) Western blot and co-IP analyses of PKCζ phosphorylation and AKAP12-PKCζ interaction in kidneys from WT and Akap12CS/CS mice after sham operation or UUO (n = 6). (G and H) Western blot analysis of p-IκB, p-p65, p-GSK-3β, and p-β-catenin in kidneys from WT and Akap12CS/CS mice after sham operation or UUO (n = 6). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (D and E). **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

Subsequently, we established a 7-day UUO model (Figure 7B). Compared with WT mice, Akap12CS/CS mice showed reduced renal injury, inflammation, and fibrosis, as shown by histological and molecular analyses (Figure 7, D and E, and Supplemental Figure 15, E and F). Immunoblot analysis revealed that AKAP12 protein levels were reduced following UUO-induced injury. Under identical injury conditions, AKAP12 protein abundance was comparable between Akap12CS/CS mice and WT littermates, suggesting that the C670S mutation did not affect overall AKAP12 expression (Supplemental Figure 15D). These findings suggest that the protective phenotype observed in Akap12CS/CS mice was not due to altered AKAP12 protein levels, but rather to the functional consequences of the C670S mutation. Similar results were observed in a 21-day UIRI model (Supplemental Figure 15, G and H, and Supplemental Figure 16, A and B). Co-IP analysis showed that UUO reduced the interaction between AKAP12 and PKCζ and increased PKCζ phosphorylation compared with sham controls. This injury-induced disruption of the AKAP12-PKCζ interaction was attenuated in Akap12CS/CS mice (Figure 7F and Supplemental Figure 16C). In parallel, Akap12CS/CS mice showed reduced phosphorylation of IκB, p65, and GSK-3β, together with enhanced phosphorylation and degradation of β-catenin, compared with WT mice subjected to UUO (Figure 7, G and H, and Supplemental Figure 16, D and E). Collectively, these findings indicate that the AKAP12 C670S mutation diminishes PKCζ/NF-κB and PKCζ/β-catenin signaling, thereby reducing UUO- and UIRI-induced renal inflammation and fibrosis.

FH deficiency exacerbates liver and pulmonary fibrosis. Next, we investigated the role of FH in fibrosis in other organs. We established a liver fibrosis model by intraperitoneal injection of CCl4 and a pulmonary fibrosis model by bleomycin administration in Fh1+/– mice (Figure 8, A and B). In both the liver fibrosis and pulmonary fibrosis models, H&E and Masson’s trichrome staining showed that Fh1+/– mice developed more severe fibrosis than WT mice (Figure 8, C and D). IHC staining further showed increased α-SMA, collagen I, F4/80, and 2SC signals in the liver and lung of Fh1+/– mice, consistent with increased fibrosis, inflammation, and succination (Supplemental Figure 17, A and B).

Fh1+/– mice show exacerbated liver and lung fibrosis, whereas AAV2/9-mediatFigure 8

Fh1+/– mice show exacerbated liver and lung fibrosis, whereas AAV2/9-mediated FH OE alleviates renal fibrosis. (A and B) Experimental design for CCl4-induced liver fibrosis and bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis models in Fh1+/+ and Fh1+/– mice. (C) Representative H&E and Masson’s trichrome staining of liver sections from Fh1+/+ and Fh1+/– mice treated with vehicle or CCl4 (n = 6). Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) Representative H&E and Masson’s trichrome staining of lung sections from Fh1+/+ and Fh1+/– mice treated with vehicle or bleomycin (n = 6). Scale bar, 100 μm. (E) Experimental design of renal in situ delivery of AAV2/9 encoding Fh1. (F) Western blot analysis of α-SMA and collagen I in kidneys from EV and Fh1-OE mice after sham operation or UIRI (n = 6). (G) Representative IHC staining for α-SMA and collagen I in kidneys from EV and Fh1-OE mice subjected to sham operation or UUO (n = 6). Scale bar, 50 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (C, D, and G). **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

Renal in situ delivery of AAV2/9 encoding Fh1 alleviates renal fibrosis. To investigate the therapeutic potential of FH, we induced FH OE by renal in situ delivery of recombinant AAV2/9 vectors encoding Fh1 (Figure 8E and Supplemental Figure 18, A–C). PAS and Masson’s trichrome staining showed that, compared with WT mice, Fh1-OE mice exhibited reduced renal injury and fibrosis following UUO or UIRI (Supplemental Figure 18, E and G). These findings were further supported by Western blot and IHC analyses of fibrotic markers (Figure 8, F and G, and Supplemental Figure 18, D–F).

Discussion

Persistent inflammatory responses driven by TEC damage and maladaptive repair are recognized as important contributors to the progression of renal fibrosis (41). However, the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Metabolites are widely recognized as intermediates in biosynthesis and energy metabolism, but our findings support an additional role for these molecules as regulators of inflammation. In this study, we showed that aberrant fumarate accumulation contributes to renal inflammation and fibrosis, with succination of AKAP12 at C670 suggesting a molecular link between metabolic disturbance and inflammatory activation. We found that FH abundance was closely associated with CKD severity. In addition, serum and urinary fumarate levels in patients with CKD were inversely correlated with eGFR, suggesting that fumarate may have potential as a noninvasive biomarker in CKD.

Functionally, our data showed that FH deficiency promoted renal fibrosis in association with enhanced inflammatory responses in renal TECs. Recent studies have suggested that fumarate can accumulate as a result of metabolic adaptation and exert functions beyond metabolism, particularly in the regulation of immunity and inflammation (42). In renal epithelial cells, intracellular FH downregulation has been reported to result in fumarate accumulation, which subsequently drives mitochondrial network remodeling and mitochondrial-derived vesicle formation, ultimately leading to mtDNA release and inflammatory activation (22). In addition, FH has been implicated in regulating macrophage inflammatory and interferon responses. FH downregulation in macrophages inhibits mitochondrial respiration, increases mitochondrial membrane potential, and enhances interferon-β production (28). In our study, RNA-seq analysis showed that FH deficiency in renal TECs during fibrosis was primarily associated with activation of inflammatory signaling pathways. Thus, our findings highlight a role for FH deficiency in TEC-associated inflammatory responses during renal fibrosis. These results indicate that FH may have diverse roles in regulating inflammation across different cell types under distinct pathological conditions.

Mechanistically, fumarate acts as an electrophile and can undergo Michael addition with nucleophilic cysteine residues on proteins, resulting in succination (43). To identify candidate fumarate-sensitive cysteine sites, we used a DBIA probe in a competitive cysteine-labeling strategy coupled with LC-MS/MS. AKAP12 C670 emerged as a strong candidate succination site, and immunoprecipitation analyses further supported increased succination of AKAP12 in the fibrotic cell model, which was attenuated by the C670S mutation. AKAP12 is a multifunctional scaffolding protein that binds PKCζ and restrains its activation (36). Recent studies have also implicated AKAP12 in inflammatory regulation (44). However, its role in renal fibrosis remains incompletely understood. Our data support that, in renal fibrosis, succination of AKAP12 weakens its interaction with PKCζ, thereby reducing AKAP12-mediated restraint of PKCζ activation and promoting PKCζ/NF-κB and PKCζ/β-catenin signaling. Consistently, mutation of AKAP12 C670 from cysteine to serine attenuated TGF-β1–induced activation of these pathways and reduced fibrotic responses. Together, these findings suggest that FH deficiency in renal TECs leads to fumarate accumulation, which promotes succination of AKAP12 at C670 and thereby enhances renal inflammation and fibrosis.

A limitation of the present study is that prior work has shown that increased fumarate levels in renal TECs can promote mtDNA release and thereby amplify inflammatory responses (22), whereas our findings support an additional mechanism centered on AKAP12 succination. Thus, the relative contribution of mtDNA release to the amplification of inflammatory responses during renal fibrosis remains to be defined. In addition, although our data suggest that FH contributes to liver and pulmonary fibrosis, whether the underlying mechanisms in these organs are the same as those identified in the kidney remains unclear. A further limitation is that, in the examined upstream region of the human FH locus, we did not identify corresponding predicted KLF9-associated motifs matching those observed upstream of mouse Fh1. While our data support a functional role for KLF9 in repressing Fh1 expression in murine renal TECs under injury conditions, they do not define the cis-regulatory mechanism governing FH downregulation in human kidneys. Given that species-specific divergence of transcription factor occupancy and cis-regulatory architecture is a common feature of gene regulation (45, 46), we restrict our mechanistic conclusion to the murine system and consider the relevance of KLF9-dependent FH regulation in human kidney disease to be an important question for future investigation.

In conclusion, our results support a role for fumarate accumulation as an important mediator of renal inflammation and fibrosis and show that fumarate levels were closely associated with the severity of renal dysfunction in CKD. In the murine system, FH downregulation during renal fibrosis was associated with KLF9-mediated repression of Fh1. FH deficiency in renal TECs led to cytoplasmic fumarate accumulation, which promoted succination of AKAP12 at C670 and weakened its interaction with PKCζ. This reduced AKAP12-mediated restraint of PKCζ activation and enhanced PKCζ/NF-κB and PKCζ/β-catenin signaling, thereby exacerbating renal inflammation and fibrosis. AAV2/9-mediated FH OE markedly attenuated fibrosis progression in preclinical models. Together, these findings support an important role for aberrant fumarate accumulation in renal fibrosis and suggest that targeting fumarate accumulation may represent a therapeutic strategy in CKD.

Methods

Sex as a biological variable. In clinical studies involving human participants, data from male and female patients with CKD were pooled for analysis. Sex was not included as a prespecified biological variable because the sample size was not sufficient to support adequately powered sex-stratified analyses. In the animal studies, male mice were used to reduce variability related to known sex differences in CKD susceptibility (47, 48) and to maintain consistency across experimental models. Potential sex-specific effects were not assessed in the present study and should be examined in future work.

Human clinical samples. Human kidney tissue sections (3–4 μm), serum, and urine samples were obtained from The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Hefei, China). Tumor-free renal tissues from patients undergoing nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma were used as control kidney tissues (n = 7; 5 females and 2 males), and renal tissues from patients with CKD were analyzed in parallel (n = 23; 8 females and 15 males). Serum and urine samples from individuals undergoing routine health examinations were used as controls (n = 7; 3 females and 4 males) for comparison with serum and urine from patients with CKD (n = 23; 8 females and 15 males). Detailed clinical information for the patients with CKD is provided in Supplemental Table 1.

Animal studies. Male C57BL/6J mice (6–8 weeks old, 20–22 g) were used in this study. WT and Fh1 knockout mice were generated by GemPharmatech. Fh1 conditional knock-in (cKI) mice and Akap12 C670S mutant mice were generated by Cyagen. For UUO, the left ureter was ligated, and mice were analyzed 7 days later. For UIRI, the left renal pedicle was clamped with a noninvasive microaneurysm clip for 45 minutes, followed by reperfusion, and mice were analyzed 21 days later. Liver fibrosis was induced by intraperitoneal injection of 20% CCl4 (5 mL/kg) every 3 days for 6 weeks. Pulmonary fibrosis was induced by intraperitoneal injection of bleomycin (35 mg/kg) twice weekly for 4 weeks, followed by a 6-week recovery period.

Cell culture, transfection, and treatments. mTECs were provided by Huiyao Lan (The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China) and maintained as previously described (49). Cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 medium (HyClone) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Biochannel) at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. For gain- and loss-of-function experiments, cells were transfected with plasmids or siRNAs, together with the corresponding control vectors or control siRNAs (Hanbio Tech), using jetPRIME (Polyplus-transfection) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For TGF-β1 stimulation, cells were serum-starved overnight in DMEM/F12 containing 0.5% fetal bovine serum and then treated with TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL) for 24 hours. For the H/R model, cells were subjected to 3 cycles of H/R, each consisting of 9 hours of hypoxia followed by 3 hours of reoxygenation. For FH-IN-1 treatment, cells were serum-starved overnight in DMEM/F12 containing 0.5% fetal bovine serum, pretreated with FH-IN-1 (10 μM) for 3 hours, and cotreated with TGF-β1 (10 ng/mL) for 24 hours. siRNA sequences are provided in Supplemental Table 2.

Statistics. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Comparisons between 2 groups were performed using 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t tests. Comparisons among multiple groups were performed using 1-way or 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, as appropriate and as specified in the figure legends. Correlations were assessed using Spearman’s correlation analysis. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study approval. Human studies were performed after written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All procedures involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (approval no. PJ20241040). All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, 2011) and were approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University (approval no. LLSC20242194).

Data availability. Raw RNA-sequencing data have been deposited in the GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo). The accession number is GSE293941. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (https://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the iProX partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD063006. Values for all data points found in graphs are in the Supporting Data Values file. Additional details on methods can be found in the Supplemental Methods.

Author contributions

WW, XMM, and SS conceived and designed the study. SS, XYY, YHD, and JMY performed most of the experiments. SS, XYY, XYL, JTY, and XYS performed the cell experiments. SS, YHD, JW, ZYS, ZQC, and YLZ performed the animal experiments. JMY, ZYG, and DXL collected the clinical samples and performed the related analyses. SSX and RH performed the GEO dataset analysis and molecular docking. SS, XYY, and YHD analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. XXX, JJ, JGW, and HW critically revised the manuscript and polished the language. WW supervised the study, interpreted the data, critically revised the manuscript, and approved the final version.

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Funding support
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82270737 and 82470732, WW).
  • Outstanding Youth Project of the Natural Science Foundation for Universities in Anhui Province (2023AH020047, WW).
  • Key Project for Cultivating Outstanding Young Teachers in Universities of Anhui Province (YQZD2023022, WW).
Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View Unedited blot and gel images

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

We thank The First Hospital of Anhui Medical University for providing the tissue, blood, and urine samples used in this study and the Center for Scientific Research of Anhui Medical University for their valuable help in our experiment. We want to acknowledge ChomiX Biotech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, https://www.chomixbio.com/) for providing help in proteomics experiments.

Address correspondence to: Wei Wang, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.17755130890; Email: wangweimw@ahmu.edu.cn. Or to: Xiao-ming Meng, School of Pharmacy, Anhui Medical University, No. 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China. Phone: 86.551.65172130; Email: mengxiaoming@ahmu.edu.cn.

Footnotes

Copyright: © 2026, Sun et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2026;136(14):e200755. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI200755.

References
  1. Levey AS, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 2005;67(6):2089–2100.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Chen TK, et al. Chronic kidney disease diagnosis and management: a review. JAMA. 2019;322(13):1294–1304.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Bikbov B, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–733.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Foreman KJ, et al. Forecasting life expectancy, years of life lost, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 250 causes of death: reference and alternative scenarios for 2016-40 for 195 countries and territories. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):2052–2090.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Ruiz-Ortega M, et al. Targeting the progression of chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(5):269–288.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Klinkhammer BM, Boor P. Kidney fibrosis: emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Mol Aspects Med. 2023;93:101206.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Humphreys BD. Mechanisms of Renal Fibrosis. In: Julius D, ed. Annual Review of Physiology, Vol 80. Annual Reviews; 2018:309–326.
  8. Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2021;398(10302):786–802.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Guo CC, et al. Crosstalk between proximal tubular epithelial cells and other interstitial cells in tubulointerstitial fibrosis after renal injury. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;14:1256375.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Liu YH. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of renal fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011;7(12):684–696.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Meng XM, et al. Inflammatory processes in renal fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10(9):493–503.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Zaslona Z, O’Neill LAJ. Cytokine-like roles for metabolites in immunity. Mol Cell. 2020;78(5):814–823.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Marsal-Beltran A, et al. Protective effects of the succinate/SUCNR1 axis on damaged hepatocytes in NAFLD. Metabolism. 2023;145:155630.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. van der Rijt S, et al. Immunometabolic rewiring of tubular epithelial cells in kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022;18(9):588–603.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Wei XJ, et al. Advances in energy metabolism in renal fibrosis. Life Sci. 2023;312:121033.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Schmidt C, et al. Fumarate hydratase in cancer: a multifaceted tumour suppressor. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020;98:15–25.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Linehan WM, Rouault TA. Molecular pathways: fumarate hydratase-deficient kidney cancer--targeting the Warburg effect in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(13):3345–3352.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Ge X, et al. Fumarate inhibits PTEN to promote tumorigenesis and therapeutic resistance of type2 papillary renal cell carcinoma. Mol Cell. 2022;82(7):1249–1260.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Zheng L, et al. Circulating succinate-modifying metabolites accurately classify and reflect the status of fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(11):16.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Valcarcel-Jimenez L, Frezza C. Fumarate hydratase (FH) and cancer: a paradigm of oncometabolism. Br J Cancer. 2023;129(10):1546–1557.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Peace CG, et al. Fumarate hydratase as a metabolic regulator of immunity. Trends Cell Biol. 2024;34(6):442–450.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Zecchini V, et al. Fumarate induces vesicular release of mtDNA to drive innate immunity. Nature. 2023;615(7952):499–506.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Liu JJ, et al. Urine tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolites predict progressive chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(12):4357–4364.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. You YH, et al. Metabolomics reveals a key role for fumarate in mediating the effects of NADPH oxidase 4 in diabetic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(2):466–481.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. McConnell BB, Yang VW. Mammalian Krüppel-like factors in health and diseases. Physiol Rev. 2010;90(4):1337–1381.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Kang L, Lai M-D. [BTEB/KLF9 and its transcriptional regulation]. Yi Chuan. 2007;29(5):515–522.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Huang RS, et al. Kidney fibrosis: from mechanisms to therapeutic medicines. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):129.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Hooftman A, et al. Macrophage fumarate hydratase restrains mtRNA-mediated interferon production. Nature. 2023;615(7952):490–498.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Blatnik M, et al. Inactivation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase by fumarate in diabetes: formation of S-(2-succinyl)cysteine, a novel chemical modification of protein and possible biomarker of mitochondrial stress. Diabetes. 2008;57(1):41–49.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Cheng J, et al. Fumarate suppresses B-cell activation and function through direct inactivation of LYN. Nat Chem Biol. 2022;18(9):954–962.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Tröger J, et al. A-kinase anchoring proteins as potential drug targets. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;166(2):420–433.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Scott JD, et al. Creating Order from Chaos: Cellular Regulation by Kinase Anchoring. In: Insel PA, ed. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vol 53. Annual Reviews; 2013:187–210.
  33. Langeberg LK, Scott JD. A-kinase-anchoring proteins. J Cell Sci. 2005;118(15):3217–3220.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  34. Qasim H, McConnell BK. AKAP12 signaling complex: impacts of compartmentalizing cAMP-dependent signaling pathways in the heart and various signaling systems. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(13):e016615.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Li H. Physiologic and pathophysiologic roles of AKAP12. Sci Prog. 2022;105(3):368504221109212.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Li ZL, et al. SSeCKS/Gravin/AKAP12 inhibits PKCζ-mediated reduction of ERK5 transactivation to prevent endotoxin-induced vascular dysfunction. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2019;19(4):372–381.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Choi YK, Kim KW. AKAP12 in astrocytes induces barrier functions in human endothelial cells through protein kinase Czeta. FEBS J. 2008;275(9):2338–2353.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Perkins ND. Integrating cell-signalling pathways with NF-kappaB and IKK function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(1):49–62.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Yang X, et al. KLF7 promotes adipocyte inflammation and glucose metabolism disorder by activating the PKCζ/NF-κB pathway. FASEB J. 2023;37(7):e23033.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Hu XR, et al. A natural small molecule mitigates kidney fibrosis by targeting Cdc42-mediated GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024;11(13):e2307850.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  41. Fu Y, et al. Inflammation in kidney repair: mechanism and therapeutic potential. Pharmacol Ther. 2022;237:108240.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Palsson-McDermott EM, O’Neill LAJ. Gang of 3: how the Krebs cycle-linked metabolites itaconate, succinate, and fumarate regulate macrophages and inflammation. Cell Metab. 2025;37(5):1049–1059.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Kulkarni RA, et al. A chemoproteomic portrait of the oncometabolite fumarate. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15(4):391–400.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Wu X, et al. AKAP12 ameliorates liver injury via targeting PI3K/AKT/PCSK6 pathway. Redox Biol. 2022;53:102328.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Odom DT, et al. Tissue-specific transcriptional regulation has diverged significantly between human and mouse. Nat Genet. 2007;39(6):730–732.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Ulirsch JC, et al. Altered chromatin occupancy of master regulators underlies evolutionary divergence in the transcriptional landscape of erythroid differentiation. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(12):e1004890.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Seppi T, et al. Sex differences in renal proximal tubular cell homeostasis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(10):3051–3062.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Zhang MZ, et al. The role of the EGF receptor in sex differences in kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30(9):1659–1673.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Yu JT, et al. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 promotes acute kidney injury by alleviating poly ADP ribose polymerase 1 degradation. Kidney Int. 2022;102(4):828–844.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (June 30, 2026): In-Press Preview
  • Version 2 (July 15, 2026): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Conflict of interest
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts