Metabolic signals critically shape innate immune responses. Through pharmacological screening of metabolic pathways, we identified aspartate metabolism as a key regulator of cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)–stimulator of interferon genes (STING) signaling. Genetically or aminooxyacetic acid–mediated (AOA-mediated) pharmacologically reducing aspartate levels markedly potentiated the cGAS-STING pathway, leading to stronger upregulation of type I interferons and interferon-stimulated genes. Mechanistically, disruption of de novo pyrimidine synthesis, a major downstream pathway of aspartate, induced mtDNA replication stress and increased mtDNA double-strand breaks, promoting mtDNA release into the cytosol. Cytosolic mtDNA synergized with cGAS-STING agonists to upregulate Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1), which recruits RIPK1/3 to sustain IRF3 phosphorylation, forming a positive feedback loop that amplifies innate immune signaling. In immunocompetent mouse models, AOA enhanced the antitumor efficacy of STING agonists, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, whereas aspartate supplementation abrogated these effects. Consistently, aspartate levels negatively correlated with antitumor immunity in colorectal cancer patient samples. Together, our study identifies aspartate–pyrimidine metabolism as a critical metabolic checkpoint that licenses STING signaling by enabling mtDNA stress to cooperate with agonist stimulation, driving type I interferon–dependent ZBP1 induction and feed-forward amplification of STING signaling, thus offering a promising strategy to enhance antitumor immunity.
Yuheng Liao, Hanze Wang, Hengxin Liu, Xi Chen, Renqiang Sun, Xie Li, Zhen Yang, Chenying Liu, Wei Wu, Ziqian He, Yuzheng Zhao, Ying Mao, Dan Ye, Hui Yang
Usage data is cumulative from June 2026 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 283 | 0 |
| 44 | 0 | |
| Figure | 16 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 11 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 2 | 0 |
| Totals | 356 | 0 |
| Total Views | 356 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.