BACKGROUND Minimally invasive biomarkers predicting the immunotherapy response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remain an unmet clinical need.METHODS In a prospective, multi-institutional phase II trial, we performed whole-genome sequencing of 185 longitudinal plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples from 68 patients with locally advanced, surgically resectable HNSCC who received neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab. We developed the regional motif diversity score (rMDS), a fragmentomic metric that quantifies the entropy of cfDNA 5′-end motifs across genomic regions.RESULTS Unsupervised analysis showed that rMDS robustly distinguished responders from nonresponders, outperforming established fragmentomic metrics and copy number alterations while remaining independent of technical confounders. Longitudinal rMDS changes localized to regions enriched for immune-, lectin-, and keratinization-related genes — hallmarks of squamous cell carcinoma — reflecting tumor–peripheral immunity interplay during treatment. The most dynamic regions clustered at telomere-proximal loci, suggesting a link between telomere biology and cfDNA fragmentation. An rMDS-based machine learning classifier achieved AUC 0.89–0.99 across validation settings, with the highest accuracy after treatment, outperforming PD-L1 expression and tumor fraction in matched samples. Predicted responders showed improved disease-free survival (log-rank P = 0.035; HR 2.67, 95% CI 1.03–6.92).CONCLUSION rMDS represents a biologically meaningful and clinically actionable biomarker for the immunotherapy response in HNSCC, and merits integration into future risk assessment frameworks.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02641093.FUNDING National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), NIH grant R56HG012360; startup funds from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Northwestern University, and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center; Science Olympiad Alumni Research Grant, Science Olympiad USA Foundation; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Ravi Bandaru, Hailu Fu, Haizi Zheng, Jocelyn Liang, Li Wang, Shuchi Gulati, Benjamin H. Hinrichs, Mingxiang Teng, Bin Zhang, Masha Kocherginsky, De-Chen Lin, David A. Hildeman, Francis P. Worden, Matthew Old, Neal E. Dunlap, John M. Kaczmar, Maura L. Gillison, Dalia El-Gamal, Trisha Wise Draper, Yaping Liu
Usage data is cumulative from May 2026 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,812 | 0 |
| 770 | 0 | |
| Figure | 310 | 0 |
| Table | 27 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 320 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 127 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,366 | 0 |
| Total Views | 4,366 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.