Usage Information
Abstract
Cancer diagnoses are prevalent in people with obesity and type 2 diabetes, and abundant clinical evidence supports the protective effects of weight loss for cancer prevention. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have revolutionized obesity and type 2 diabetes medicine and alleviate many comorbidities of these metabolic diseases. In this Review, we summarize the current clinical evidence for GLP-1 receptor agonists and cancer risk, including thyroid, pancreatic, gastrointestinal, and hormone-dependent malignancies. With few exceptions, recent meta-analyses report that GLP-1 receptor therapies do not increase cancer incidence and may lower risk in some cases. Preclinical studies reinforce the anticancer effects of GLP-1 receptor therapies, even in non-obese models. However, there are still many opportunities for translational insight as the field grows. Immune-modulating effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists are reported in several preclinical cancer studies, which may reflect direct action on immune cells or result from improved metabolic function. We highlight ongoing clinical trials for GLP-1 receptor therapies in cancer patients, and offer considerations for preclinical studies, including perspectives on the timing and duration of GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment, concurrent use of standard anticancer therapies, and interpretation of models of cancer risk versus progression.
Authors
Estefania Valencia-Rincón, Rajani Rai, Vishal Chandra, Elizabeth A. Wellberg
Usage data is cumulative from November 2025 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 19,881 | 7,234 |
| 2,035 | 581 | |
| Figure | 687 | 0 |
| Table | 549 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 294 | 0 |
| Totals | 23,446 | 7,815 |
| Total Views | 31,261 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)