Mutations in SLC26A4 are the second most common cause of hereditary hearing loss in many Asian countries, leading to DFNB4, a condition characterized by progressive hearing loss and inner ear malformations. While gene therapy holds great potential, its postnatal application has remained unexplored due to the lack of suitable animal models and the challenges of prenatal intervention. This study represents the first preclinical investigation of postnatal gene therapy for DFNB4 using a clinically relevant Slc26a4 mutant mouse model that closely replicates human auditory phenotypes. Utilizing the synthetic AAV.Anc80L65 vector, we achieved robust SLC26A4 delivery to critical cochlear regions, including the endolymphatic sac and cochlear lateral wall. Comprehensive phenotypic analyses revealed a critical therapeutic window spanning the neonatal and juvenile stages, within which AAV.Anc80L65-mediated SLC26A4 delivery significantly improved hearing, as evidenced by lower auditory brainstem response thresholds. Moreover, the therapy preserved hair cells, reduced endolymphatic sac enlargement, partially restored the endocochlear potential, and mitigated inner ear structural degeneration. These therapeutic effects persisted into adulthood, highlighting the long-term efficacy of postnatal gene therapy. Together, these findings establish a critical therapeutic window for DFNB4 and demonstrate the feasibility of targeting the endolymphatic sac and cochlear lateral wall for effective intervention.
Yi-Hsiu Tsai, Peng-Yu Wu, Yu-Chi Chuang, Chun-Ying Huang, Hiroki Takeda, Hiroshi Hibino, Chen-Chi Wu, Yen-Fu Cheng
Usage data is cumulative from February 2026 through February 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 162 | 0 |
| 77 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 13 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 10 | 0 |
| Totals | 262 | 0 |
| Total Views | 262 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.