Hormone Receptor positive (HR+) breast cancers (BC) are typically “immune-cold” poorly immune infiltrated tumors that do not respond to immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies. Using clinical data, we report that estrogen receptor (ERα) signaling associates with immunosuppressive pathways and lack of response to ICB in HR+ patients. In this study, we validate ER-mediated immunosuppression by engineering and modulating ER in preclinical models in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo. Mechanistically, we found that ERα hijacks LCOR, a nuclear receptor corepressor, thereby preventing LCOR’s function in the induction of tumor immunogenicity and immune infiltration, which is normally observed in the absence of ERα, such as in ER-negative BC. In HR+BC, we demonstrate that the molecular disruption of LCOR and ERα interaction using anti-ER therapies or using a mutant of the LCOR nuclear-receptor binding domain (LSKLL into LSKAA) that does not interact with ERα, restores LCOR’s immunogenic functions. Remarkably, the LCOR-ERα disruption converts HR+BC immune-cold tumors into immune-hot tumors responsive to ICB by increased antigen presentation machinery (APM) expression, immune infiltration, T cell recognition and mediated killing. In conclusion, ERα inhibition and the disruption of LCOR to ERα represent a novel therapeutic strategy and an opportunity to elicit immunotherapeutic benefit in HR+BC patients.
José Ángel Palomeque, Gabriel Serra-Mir, Sandra Blasco-Benito, Helena Brunel, Pau Torren-Duran, Iván Pérez-Núñez, Chiara Cannatá, Laura Comerma, Silvia Menendez, Sonia Servitja, Tamara Martos, Maria Castro, Rodrigo L. Borges, Joanna I. Lopez-Velazco, Sara Manzano, Santiago Duro-Sánchez, Joaquin Arribas, Maria M. Caffarel, Ander Urruticoechea, Jose A. Seoane, Lluis Morey, Joan Albanell, Toni Celià-Terrassa
Usage data is cumulative from November 2025 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 973 | 0 |
| 491 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 130 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 64 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,658 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,658 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.