Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research ArticleEndocrinologyGeneticsMetabolism Open Access | 10.1172/JCI190180

The human glucocorticoid receptor variant rs6190 increases blood cholesterol and promotes atherosclerosis

Hima Bindu Durumutla,1,2 April Haller,3 Greta Noble,1 Ashok Daniel Prabakaran,1 Kevin McFarland,1 Hannah Latimer,1 Akanksha Rajput,1 Olukunle Akinborewa,1,4 Bahram Namjou-Khales,2,5 David Y. Hui,3 and Mattia Quattrocelli1,2

1Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics,

3Department of Pathology, and

4Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neurobiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

5Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Address correspondence to: Mattia Quattrocelli, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way T4.676, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Phone: 1.513.517.1221; Email: mattia.quattrocelli@cchmc.org.

Find articles by Durumutla, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics,

3Department of Pathology, and

4Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neurobiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

5Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Address correspondence to: Mattia Quattrocelli, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way T4.676, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Phone: 1.513.517.1221; Email: mattia.quattrocelli@cchmc.org.

Find articles by Haller, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics,

3Department of Pathology, and

4Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neurobiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

5Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Address correspondence to: Mattia Quattrocelli, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way T4.676, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Phone: 1.513.517.1221; Email: mattia.quattrocelli@cchmc.org.

Find articles by Noble, G. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics,

3Department of Pathology, and

4Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neurobiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

5Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Address correspondence to: Mattia Quattrocelli, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way T4.676, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Phone: 1.513.517.1221; Email: mattia.quattrocelli@cchmc.org.

Find articles by Prabakaran, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics,

3Department of Pathology, and

4Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neurobiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

5Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Address correspondence to: Mattia Quattrocelli, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way T4.676, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Phone: 1.513.517.1221; Email: mattia.quattrocelli@cchmc.org.

Find articles by McFarland, K. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics,

3Department of Pathology, and

4Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neurobiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

5Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Address correspondence to: Mattia Quattrocelli, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way T4.676, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Phone: 1.513.517.1221; Email: mattia.quattrocelli@cchmc.org.

Find articles by Latimer, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics,

3Department of Pathology, and

4Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neurobiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

5Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Address correspondence to: Mattia Quattrocelli, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way T4.676, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Phone: 1.513.517.1221; Email: mattia.quattrocelli@cchmc.org.

Find articles by Rajput, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics,

3Department of Pathology, and

4Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neurobiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

5Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Address correspondence to: Mattia Quattrocelli, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way T4.676, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Phone: 1.513.517.1221; Email: mattia.quattrocelli@cchmc.org.

Find articles by Akinborewa, O. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics,

3Department of Pathology, and

4Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neurobiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

5Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Address correspondence to: Mattia Quattrocelli, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way T4.676, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Phone: 1.513.517.1221; Email: mattia.quattrocelli@cchmc.org.

Find articles by Namjou-Khales, B. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics,

3Department of Pathology, and

4Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neurobiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

5Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Address correspondence to: Mattia Quattrocelli, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way T4.676, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Phone: 1.513.517.1221; Email: mattia.quattrocelli@cchmc.org.

Find articles by Hui, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

2Department of Pediatrics,

3Department of Pathology, and

4Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neurobiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

5Center for Autoimmune Genomics and Etiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Address correspondence to: Mattia Quattrocelli, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way T4.676, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Phone: 1.513.517.1221; Email: mattia.quattrocelli@cchmc.org.

Find articles by Quattrocelli, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Published July 1, 2025 - More info

Published in Volume 135, Issue 17 on September 2, 2025
J Clin Invest. 2025;135(17):e190180. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI190180.
© 2025 Durumutla et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published July 1, 2025 - Version history
Received: December 10, 2024; Accepted: June 25, 2025
View PDF
Abstract

Elevated cholesterol poses cardiovascular risks. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) harbors a still undefined role in cholesterol regulation. Here, we report that a coding SNP in the gene encoding the GR, rs6190, is associated with increased cholesterol in women according to UK Biobank and All of Us (NIH) datasets. In SNP-genocopying mice, we found that the SNP enhanced hepatic GR activity to transactivate Pcsk9 and Bhlhe40, negative regulators of LDL and HDL receptors, respectively. In mice, the SNP was sufficient to elevate circulating cholesterol across all lipoprotein fractions and the risk and severity of atherosclerotic lesions on the proatherogenic hAPOE*2/*2 background. The SNP effect on atherosclerosis was blocked by in vivo liver knockdown of Pcsk9 and Bhlhe40. Also, corticosterone and testosterone were protective against the mutant GR program in cholesterol and atherosclerosis in male mice, while the SNP effect was additive to estrogen loss in females. Remarkably, we found that the mutant GR program was conserved in human hepatocyte-like cells using CRISPR-engineered, SNP-genocopying human induced pluripotent stem cells. Taken together, our study leverages a nonrare human variant to uncover a GR-dependent mechanism contributing to atherogenic risk, particularly in women.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

Elevated plasma cholesterol is a significant risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In women, the risk of developing high cholesterol and atherosclerosis typically increases with age and particularly after menopause (1), when the inhibitory effects of estrogen on atherogenesis decline (2). However, the cholesterol regulations underlying this phenomenon remain unclear, as recently shown by counterintuitive associations between LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk in the UK Biobank (3). Although advancements in drug therapies and lifestyle interventions have demonstrated efficacy, the identification of genetic and epigenetic factors regulating cholesterol is still ongoing to increase our mechanistic understanding and better predict and manage elevated cholesterol.

Despite its involvement in virtually every nutrient’s metabolism, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) remains a poorly defined nuclear factor in cholesterol homeostasis. The GR is a ligand-activated nuclear transcription factor that exerts multifaceted effects on nutrient metabolism (4, 5) by transactivating or transrepressing large gene programs in a tissue-specific manner (6). Although it is traditionally recognized for its role in immune regulation, GR profoundly influences metabolic processes, including glucose and lipid metabolism (7). Previous studies employing GR knockdown in liver and adipose tissue have shown promising outcomes in mitigating hypercholesterolemia and associated metabolic abnormalities in obese diabetic mice (8). Retrospective studies involving pathomorphological data obtained from human autopsies have provided insights into potential relationships between glucocorticoid treatments and atherogenesis (9–12). However, the direct link between the hepatic GR and regulation of cholesterol levels remains elusive. Indeed, although the glucocorticoid/GR axis has been implicated in apolipoprotein expression (13) and cholesterol efflux in macrophages (14, 15), the epigenetic and transcriptional mechanisms enabled by the GR in hepatocyte-autonomous cholesterol uptake remain poorly defined.

Previously, several genetic variants in the GR gene (NR3C1; OMIM #138040) have been described in the human population. These genetic variants can affect the transcriptional activity of the GR and its downstream target genes, potentially influencing nutrient regulation (16–19). Epidemiological studies have provided evidence of an association between specific GR polymorphisms and variation in lipid profiles (16, 20, 21). Notably, the rs6190 (c.68G>A; p.R23K) coding SNP — also known as E22R/E23K due its complete linkage to the silent p.E22E rs6189 SNP — is a genetic variant in codon 23 that results in an amino acid change from arginine (R) to lysine (K) in the N-terminus of the GR protein (22). This mutation has been linked to alterations in several parameters of metabolic homeostasis in humans, including cholesterol (18). However, the precise molecular mechanisms through which this polymorphism skews GR activity to perturb cholesterol remain poorly characterized.

In this study, we harnessed the human rs6190 SNP to identify a direct GR-mediated program governing hepatic cholesterol regulation and its association with atherogenic risk. We found that this low-frequency coding SNP correlated with increased levels of cholesterol in women from UK Biobank and All of Us (NIH) cohorts, and it promoted cholesterol and atherosclerosis in transgenic mice according to the number of SNP alleles (homo>hetero>reference). Our transcriptomic and epigenetic datasets revealed that the mutant GR perturbed cholesterol levels through transactivation of Pcsk9 and Bhlhe40, negative regulators of LDL and HDL receptors in the liver. Our study identifies rs6190 as a potential risk factor for atherosclerosis, particularly in women, and reports unanticipated mechanisms through which the hepatic GR affects cholesterol levels in the circulation.

Results

rs6190 SNP increases plasma cholesterol levels in women according to allele zygosity. To investigate the influence of the rs6190 variant on cholesterol regulation, we probed the large adult cohort from the UK Biobank, comprising 485,895 people aged 40–70 years. In this cohort, the GR rs6190 variant (NR3C1 gene, transcript ENST00000231509.3 (-strand); c.68G>A; p.R23K) exhibited a minor allele frequency of 2.75% (25,944 heterozygous, 413 homozygous individuals), categorizing it as a low-frequency variant (22). We screened the quantitated parameters from the NMR metabolomics dataset within the UK Biobank dataset (120,536 individuals comprising 65,156 women and 55,380 men; same age range as general dataset, 40–70 years) for rs6190 associations disaggregated by sex. All analyses were adjusted for age, BMI, top 10 principal components, and genotype information for 12 commonly referenced hypercholesterolemia-associated SNPs within PCSK9, CELSR2, APOB, ABCG8, SLC22A1, HFE, MYLIP, ST3GAL4, NYNRIN, LDLR, and APOE genes (23). Importantly, none of these 12 classical variants were in the neighborhood of rs6190 and did not show significant pairwise linkage disequilibrium effect (r2 < 0.001) at the genomic level. Although no associations were significant after multiple tests in men, rs6190 SNP was significantly associated with many cholesterol parameters in women, accounting for 23 out of 33 total plasma parameters with a significant rs6190 effect (adjusted P < 0.005) (Figure 1A).

rs6190 correlates with cholesterol increase in women from the UK Biobank anFigure 1

rs6190 correlates with cholesterol increase in women from the UK Biobank and All of US datasets. (A) Unbiased ranking of UK Biobank plasma NMR parameters for significant rs6190 effect in women. Cholesterol-related parameters are highlighted in text and red bars. P values were adjusted for age, BMI, and canonical hypercholesterolemia-associated SNPs. (B) Linear regressions (blue lines; shaded area represents 95% CI; corrected for age, diabetes, triacylglycerols) and median CI (Kruskal-Wallis test) show zygosity-dependent trends in elevation of total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol in women. (C and D) Compared with noncarriers, homozygous SNP carriers showed increased odds ratio for hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular disease deaths according to ICD10 codes; χ2 test. (E) Linear regressions and median comparisons correlated rs6190 genotype with cholesterol elevation in women from the All of Us dataset, including all ancestries and ages. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

We then stratified total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol values from women according to SNP zygosity. We are defining here homozygous carriers of the reference allele (control population) as GRref/ref, heterozygous SNP carriers as GRref/ALT, and homozygous SNP carriers as GRALT/ALT. We performed linear regressions with a mixed model correcting for age, BMI, diabetic status, and triacylglycerols. In parallel, we also compared median confidence intervals across rs6190 genotypes. Remarkably, total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol showed a modest but significant elevation of median levels according to the number of SNP alleles in women (Figure 1B). The zygosity-dependent trends were not significant in men (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI190180DS1). Considering the effects on cholesterol, we probed the total UK Biobank dataset for hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular disease mortality odds ratios. In alignment with the trends in cholesterol, GRALT/ALT women displayed an increased odds ratio of 1.34 (95% CI: 1.02–1.76; P = 0.0092) for hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol >240 mg/dL) and 2.37 (95% CI: 1.05–5.9; P = 0.01) for death due to cardiovascular diseases, compared with GRref/ref women (Figure 1, C and D).

To probe these rs6190 correlations in a more genetically diverse human dataset, we queried the All of Us dataset, where we found the SNP at a variable minor allele frequency ranging from low frequency to rare across ancestries: African/African American, 0.49%; American Admixed/Latino, 0.84%; East Asian, 0.061%; European, 2.67%; Middle Eastern, 1.43%; and South Asian, 1.49%. In the All of Us subset of 245,385 individuals with rs6190 genotype annotation encompassing all ancestries and ages, we repeated the linear regressions corrected for age, BMI, diabetes, triacylglycerols, and the median comparisons. The analyses in the All of Us dataset confirmed a significant correlation between rs6190 zygosity and total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol levels in women (Figure 1E), whereas correlations were not significant once again in men (Supplemental Figure 1B).

Because NR3C1 variants did not come up as top hits for cholesterol in GWAS studies so far, we counter-verified whether targeted regressions for total cholesterol could “unmask” potential correlations of NR3C1 variants not associated with cholesterol through previous GWAS studies. We extracted 38 NR3C1 locus variants with GWAS significant hits (<5 × 10−8) from the current European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) GWAS catalog and ran linear regressions — aggregated for ancestry but disaggregated for sex — for total cholesterol in the All of Us dataset (Supplemental Table 1). All 38 variants were noncoding and in weak-to-negligible linkage disequilibrium (LD) range with rs6190 (LD, r2 < 0.15). None of the 38 variants had a significant reported GWAS hit for cholesterol. However, our regressions showed 24 variants with correlations (adjusted P < 0.05; 20 direct; 4 inverse) with total cholesterol according to zygosity. Intriguingly, those correlations were significant only in women and not in men for all 24 variants, analogous to our findings with rs6190.

Taken together, our findings highlight the association of the rs6190 SNP with modest but significant elevations of cholesterol in women from the UK Biobank and the All of Us cohorts.

The rs6190 SNP is sufficient to increase plasma cholesterol and promotes GR transactivation of Pcsk9 and Bhlhe40 in mice. To elucidate the extent to which the mutant GR promotes cholesterol elevation, we introduced a genocopy of the rs6190 SNP into the endogenous Nr3c1 (GR gene) locus on the C57BL/6J background. The murine ortholog of the human GR-R23K mutation is GR-R24K due to an additional amino acid in position 10. Employing CRISPR-mediated knockin recombination, the murine GR gene was targeted at the orthologous codon 24, resulting in C>T mutation in the forward strand (c.71G>A mutation in the codon, reverse strand), leading to a p.R24K amino acid substitution (Supplemental Figure 2A). In concordance with human carriers, we define here homozygous mice for WT allele as GRref/ref (control), heterozygous SNP mice as GRref/ALT, and homozygous SNP mice as GRALT/ALT. In female littermate mice under normal chow conditions, total plasma cholesterol increased according to SNP zygosity in both fasted and fed states (Figure 2A). Using the standard fast-performance liquid chromatography (FPLC) method, we found that the GR SNP elicited an increase in cholesterol levels across all lipoprotein fractions — VLDL, LDL, and HDL cholesterol — according to SNP allele number, in conditions of either regular chow or a 16-week Western diet in female mice (Figure 2B) but not male mice (Supplemental Figure 2B). This sex-specific effect in mice paralleled the correlations within human datasets and prompted us to focus on female mice for the bulk of our histological, physiological, and mechanistic analyses. After Western diet exposure, in 3 out of 5 analyzed GRALT/ALT female mice, we found histological evidence of immature plaque formation in the aortic root (Supplemental Figure 2C), a remarkable finding in the absence of proatherogenic genetic backgrounds. Our findings provide evidence that, in homogeneous genetic settings, the SNP is sufficient to modestly but significantly elevate total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol in female mice according to an incomplete dominance model (i.e., commensurate to SNP zygosity).

The rs6190 SNP is sufficient to increase cholesterol and skew the liver GRFigure 2

The rs6190 SNP is sufficient to increase cholesterol and skew the liver GR to a gene program repressing liver cholesterol uptake in mice. (A) Zygosity-dependent increases in cholesterol in both fed and fasted states in littermate control versus SNP-carrier mice. (B) Analogous trends with regular and Western diets, as assayed through FPLC distribution of cholesterol across lipoprotein fractions (arrows highlight increases in LDL and HDL cholesterol). (C) RNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq overlay in liver tissue identified Pcks9 and Bhlhe40 as putative transactivation targets of the mutant GR. (D and E) ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq, as well as validation Western blot values for PCSK9, BHLHE40, and their putative targets LDLR and SR-B1. (F) Uptake of LDL and HDL particles (traced by red fluorescence) was lower in GRALT/ALT than GRref/ref primary hepatocytes. n = 3–10 females/group, 3–6 months; A: 1-way ANOVA and Šidák’s test; D–F: Welch’s t test; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

We then focused our mechanistic analyses on GRref/ref versus GRALT/ALT liver comparisons, considering the primary role of this organ in cholesterol regulation (24). In line with Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) (25) predictions on rs6190 as a nonsignificant expression quantitative trait locus for overall NR3C1 expression levels in the liver, overall GR protein levels in the liver or primary hepatocytes did not change between GRref/ref versus GRALT/ALT mice (Supplemental Figure 2D). We also checked in other metabolic tissues of primary relevance for lipidemia and cardiovascular health (i.e., adipose tissue and kidney) and found no SNP effects on overall GR protein levels (Supplemental Figure 2D). Given that the N-terminus is important for cofactor binding and therefore epigenetic activity of the GR (26), we tested whether the mutant GR had significant changes in interactome by performing GR IP followed by mass spectrometry (IP-MS) in GRref/ref versus GRALT/ALT liver tissues. IP-MS in the liver identified Hsp90 among top hits for decreased interaction with the mutant GR compared with the WT GR. Co-IP in tissue extracts confirmed decreased GR-Hsp90 interaction in not only the liver, but also other metabolically active tissues like adipose and kidney (Supplemental Figure 3A). Hsp90 is a cytoplasmic docker for the GR, and we therefore asked whether the decreased interaction of the mutant GR with Hsp90 corresponded to increased levels of GR nuclear translocation. We tested this in vivo in GRref/ref versus GRALT/ALT mice at 30 minutes after a single i.p. 1 mg/kg dexamethasone (GR activator) or vehicle pulse, comparing nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions from liver, adipose, and kidney tissues. The mutant GR showed increased nuclear/cytoplasmic signal enrichment compared with the WT GR in both control and GR-activated states (Supplemental Figure 3B), supporting an increased propensity to nuclear translocation by the mutant GR. The changes in liver tissue were recapitulated in primary GRref/ref versus GRALT/ALT hepatocytes in vitro for both Hsp90 interaction and nuclear translocation at 30 minutes after 1 μM dexamethasone or vehicle (Supplemental Figure 3C). Also, in primary hepatocytes from GRref/ref versus GRref/ALT versus GRALT/ALT mice, the mutant GR showed an increased epigenetic activity both at baseline and after dexamethasone stimulation, assayed through a luciferase reporter of direct GR-driven transactivation (Supplemental Figure 3C). Because these data pointed to an SNP-dependent change in GR epigenetic activity, we conducted RNA-Seq and GR ChIP-Seq in the liver to identify potential differential targets of GR transactivation based on the GR SNP genotype. The liver GR ChIP-Seq was validated by enrichment for the canonical glucocorticoid receptor element (GRE) motif in unbiased motif analysis (Supplemental Figure 3D). Compared with the control GR, the increased epigenomic activity of the mutant GR was evidenced by increased GR signal on GRE sites genome-wide and on the Fkbp5 promoter, a canonical marker for GR activity (27, 28) (Supplemental Figure 3, E and F). No statistical differences were noted in overall peak number or genomic peak distribution, which clustered preferentially in proximal promoter regions for both genotypes (Supplemental Figure 3, G and H), suggesting that the mutant GR showed an increased activity on “normal” GR sites, rather than a profound redistribution/acquisition of GR peaks. Liver RNA-Seq revealed 368 genes with differential expression by the mutant GR (Supplemental Figure 3I). The overlay of both datasets unveiled 236 genes exhibiting both differential expression and a gain of mutant GR signal on their promoters (Figure 2C). Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed a significant enrichment for cholesterol metabolism. Notably, within this pathway, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (Pcsk9) was the highest hit. The increased transactivation of Pcsk9 in the liver by the mutant GR was validated at mRNA and protein levels (Figure 2, D and E). Besides indirect and direct inhibition of VLDL cholesterol clearance (29, 30), PCSK9 plays a pivotal role in increasing circulating LDL cholesterol by promoting the degradation of the main LDL cholesterol receptor, LDLR, at the protein level (31, 32). Accordingly, the gain in PCSK9 levels correlated with a reduction in protein but not mRNA levels of LDLR in GRALT/ALT compared with GRref/ref liver tissues (Figure 2, D and E). Additionally, within the “rhythmic process” pathway from the ChIP-Seq/RNA-Seq overlay, the top hit for mutant GR transactivation was Bhlhe40 (Figure 2C), a transcriptional repressor involved in many processes, including circadian clock homeostasis (33, 34). Using an ENCODE-mining platform for transcription factor target prediction (35), we screened for putative Bhlhe40 targets in the promoters of downregulated genes in mutant versus WT livers. This analysis revealed scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-B1), encoded by Scarb1, as a unique hypothetical target of BHLHE40 from our RNA-Seq datasets. SR-B1 is the main receptor for reverse HDL cholesterol transport in the liver (36). Consistent with our prediction, Bhlhe40 upregulation correlated with SR-B1 downregulation at both mRNA and protein levels in GRALT/ALT compared with GRref/ref liver tissues (Figure 2, D and E). Additionally, to confirm the in silico prediction of SR-B1 transcriptional repression by BHLHE40, we compared Scarb1 expression and SR-B1 protein levels in liver tissues from Bhlhe40null/null (37) (Bhlhe40-KO) versus their WT littermate controls (Bhlhe40-WT). As hypothesized, SR-B1 was upregulated in the Bhlhe40-KO livers compared with WT controls (Supplemental Figure 3J). We then asked the extent to which the mutant GR effect on LDLR and SR-B1 downregulation was biologically significant on hepatocyte biology. We probed fluorescently labeled LDL and HDL uptake assays in primary hepatocytes to assess this propensity in the absence of body-wide confounders. In line with the LDLR and SR-B1 changes, the GRALT/ALT hepatocytes showed decreased LDL and HDL uptake in vitro compared with GRref/ref control hepatocytes (Figure 2F). Collectively, our findings support a mechanism for the rs6190 SNP effect on cholesterol through which the SNP skews the hepatic GR epigenetic activity and promotes transactivation of Pcsk9 and Bhlhe40, which in turn decreases LDL and HDL cholesterol uptake in liver by repressing LDLR and SR-B1 levels, respectively.

CRISPR-engineered human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived hepatocytes confirm the mouse-to-human relevance for the SNP mechanism. In tandem with our murine mouse studies, we questioned whether the molecular SNP mechanism identified was translatable to human hepatocytes. We therefore generated SNP heterozygous and homozygous lines from the same parental GRref/ref human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) line through a CRISPR-knockin system. Individual founding clones of isogenic GRref/ref (control), GRref/ALT (het), and GRALT/ALT (homo) hiPSCs were verified through Sanger sequencing and quality-controlled for pluripotency marker expression (Figure 3A and Supplemental Figure 4A). Despite no differences in pluripotency markers, the SNP significantly skewed the GR to a higher rate of glucocorticoid-driven GR translocation in hiPSCs, as shown by serial imaging after a dexamethasone pulse (Supplemental Figure 4B) and consistent with our previous findings with the mutant GR in murine hepatocyte luciferase assay and liver ChIP-Seq.

The SNP molecular effects are replicated in hiPSC-derived hepatocytes.Figure 3

The SNP molecular effects are replicated in hiPSC-derived hepatocytes. (A) Sanger sequencing of SNP genotype and bright-field representative images for isogenic hiPSCs and derived hepatocytes with no, 1, or 2 rs6190 SNP alleles. (B and C) Rate of GR nuclear signal enrichment in hiPSC-hepatocytes increased between 20 and 60 minutes after dexamethasone addition according to SNP zygosity. (D) Zygosity-dependent effects on PCSK9 and BHLHE40 upregulation at the hepatocyte level, as well as on protein level downregulation for LDLR and SR-B1. (E and F) SNP zygosity replicated the effects on HDL and LDL fluorescent particle uptake in hiPSC-hepatocytes. Scale bars: 100 μm. Each dot represents an independent differentiation replicate; n = 3–6/group. B: 2-way ANOVA and Šidák’s test; C–E: 1-way ANOVA and Šidák’s test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.

To investigate whether the SNP-mediated molecular mechanism was conserved in human hepatocytes, we subjected the isogenic lines of hiPSCs to a 23-day differentiation protocol to generate mature hepatocyte-like cells (38). Given the well-established role of GR as a regulator of hepatocyte differentiation and maturation (39–41), we sought to investigate whether the presence of the GR SNP influenced the differentiation process. To address this, we examined the expression profiles of differentiation markers at multiple time points during the differentiation process: NANOG and OCT4 at the pluripotent stage (42); SOX17 and FOXA2 at the definitive endoderm stage (43); AFP and HNF1A at the immature hepatocyte stage (44); and ALB and CY18, morphology, and albumin secretion at the mature hepatocyte stage (45). We did not detect any SNP-driven significant alterations in the in vitro maturation process of hiPSC-derived hepatocytes (Supplemental Figure 4, C and D). However, the hiPSC-derived hepatocytes reproduced the zygosity-dependent increase in GR nuclear translocation (Figure 3, B and C) and the SNP-mediated effects on PCSK9 and BHLHE40 transactivation, as well as posttranslational repression of LDLR and SR-B1 (Figure 3D). Furthermore, the GRALT/ALT hiPSC-derived hepatocytes displayed decreased uptake of HDL and LDL cholesterol compared with GRref/ref control cells (Figure 3, E and F). Taken together, our hiPSC-derived hepatocyte data confirmed that the molecular SNP mechanism is conserved in human cells and appears autonomous to hepatocytes in the absence of in vivo body-wide physiology.

rs6190 GR SNP promotes atherosclerosis in vivo. Despite our results so far linking the mutant GR to cholesterol regulation, the extent to which the overall SNP-enabled program significantly affects atherosclerosis in vivo remains unknown. To evaluate the extent to which the rs6190 SNP contributes to atherogenic risk in vivo in conditions of genetic homogeneity, we crossed our mutant SNP mice with the atherogenic background characterized by homozygous expression of the human APOE*2 variant (46, 47). The hAPOE*2/*2 mice are well-established transgenic mice known for their susceptibility to atherosclerosis while maintaining cholesterol distribution across all 3 major lipoprotein compartments (47, 48), unlike other atherogenic backgrounds like ApoE-KO. We also excluded the Ldlr-KO background as a direct genetic confounder of our LDLR-involving hypothesis.

For these analyses, we focused on GRALT/ALT versus GRref/ref female mice. On the hAPOE*2/*2 background and regular chow diet, GRALT/ALT mice exhibited elevated levels of VLDL, LDL, and HDL cholesterol in the FPLC curves compared with control littermates, and this was reinforced even more after 16 weeks of Western diet exposure (Figure 4A). We focused on mice exposed to the Western diet for atherosclerotic plaque analyses. Compared with GRref/ref, GRALT/ALT mice exhibited a significant increase in atherosclerotic plaque incidence as quantitated through overall plaque/total aorta area ratio in en face whole-aorta staining and imaging (Figure 4B). Furthermore, histological analysis of the aortic root cross-sections and Oil Red O staining revealed a significant increase in atherosclerotic lesion size (plaque/lumen ratio) and lipid accumulation in GRALT/ALT versus GRref/ref mice (Figure 4B). Finally, considering our hypothesis of Pcsk9 and Bhlhe40 as mechanistic mediators of the SNP effect, we tested the effect of in vivo knockdown of these genes on the SNP-mediated effect on cholesterol and atherosclerosis through AAV8 vectors. For Pcsk9 knockdown, we used a previously reported AAV vector (49) and confirmed its max knockdown effect in the liver in vivo in Apo*2/*2 mice on a Western diet with a 1 × 1013 vg/mouse dose (Supplemental Figure 5A). For Bhlhe40, we combined 2 AAVs with different shRNAs under the U6 promoter, as they showed synergistic effect on Bhlhe40 knockdown in Apo*2/*2 livers (Supplemental Figure 5B). At 2 months of age, GRALT/ALT versus GRref/ref female mice on the ApoE*2/*2 background were injected retro-orbitally with 3 × 1013 vg/mouse AAV-scramble or 3 × 1012 vg/mouse/vector AAV-antiPcsk9 (1 vector) plus AAV-antiBhlhe40 (2 vectors) immediately before starting the 16-week Western diet exposure. At the endpoint, we validated knockdown of PCSK9 and BHLH40 and consistent increases in LDLR and SR-B1 (Figure 4C), and then focused on FPLC cholesterol curves and atherosclerotic plaques as readouts. Compared with scramble, the knockdown vectors reduced the cholesterol levels across lipoprotein fractions in GRALT/ALT mice to GRref/ref-like levels (Figure 4D) and blunted the SNP-mediated effect on plaque incidence (Figure 4E) and severity (Figure 4F). We also noted that the knockdown vectors reduced VLDL cholesterol and plaque incidence but not histological plaque severity in GRref/ref mice compared with scramble. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that the rs6190 SNP promotes hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis in vivo through upregulation of Pcsk9 and Bhlhe40 in liver.

The SNP promotes atherosclerosis in vivo.Figure 4

The SNP promotes atherosclerosis in vivo. (A) FPLC curves show the additive effect of SNP genotype on the hAPOE*2/*2-driven hypercholesterolemia across lipoprotein fractions in both normal and Western diets (arrows). (B) Compared with GRref/ref mice, GRALT/ALT mice on the hAPOE*2/*2 background showed higher incidence (as quantitated from en face analyses) and severity (as quantitated through Oil Red O staining in aortic root sections) of atherosclerotic plaques. (C) Western blot validation of target knockdown in liver. (D–F) AAV-mediated knockdown of Pcsk9 and Bhlhe40 in adult mice blunted the SNP effect on VLDL, LDL, and HDL cholesterol (FPLC), plaque incidence in en face aorta assays, and histological severity of aortic root plaques. Scale bars: 500 μm. n = 4–7 females/group, 6 months; B: Welch’s t test; E and F: 2-way ANOVA and Šidák’s test; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001.

Determinants of sexual dimorphism in the SNP effect. Our analyses in human datasets and mice pointed at sexual dimorphism in the rs6190 SNP effect on cholesterol regulation: significant in women and female mice, while not significant in men and male mice. We sought to test the hormonal determinants of this dimorphism and tested 2 complementary hypotheses in our mutant and control mice: (a) lower corticosterone-driven activation of the mutant GR program in males versus females, and (b) protective effect of testosterone against the “default” SNP effect on cholesterol. For the first question, we measured peak serum corticosterone at zeitgeber time 16 (ZT16) through ELISA and found modestly but significantly lower corticosterone in males compared with females regardless of SNP genotypes (Figure 5A), in line with prior sex comparisons for murine corticosterone (50). We reasoned that the lower corticosterone in males could reduce the magnitude of the mutant GR-driven transactivation program in the liver and therefore measured the protein levels of the identified cascade (increased PCSK9 and BHLHE40, decreased LDLR and SR-B1) in liver tissues across sexes and genotypes in head-to-head comparisons. The magnitude of the SNP effect on each protein change (GRALT/ALT versus GRref/ref) was indeed smaller in males than females (Figure 5B). Albeit modest, the molecular SNP effect was still significant in male livers, consistent with the intrinsic changes induced by the SNP in the GR transactivation program per se (Figure 5B). For the second question, we challenged mutant and control littermate males on either normal (WT background plus regular chow) or atherogenic conditions (hAPOE*2/*2 background plus Western diet) with bilateral orchiectomy (ORX). As a parallel experimental counterpart and to gain insight into the extent to which the SNP effect is potentially additive to menopause in women, we also challenged female littermates to bilateral ovariectomy (OVX). Sham surgeries were used as controls in both sexes. We confirmed the expected testosterone depletion with ORX and estradiol depletion with OVX through serum ELISA at 2 weeks after surgery in WT mice on regular chow (Figure 5C). We profiled cholesterol across lipoprotein fractions through FPLC, as this was a significant SNP effect in female mice in both normal and atherogenic conditions. In male mice at 4 months after surgery, the SNP effect was not present in sham-operated mice (no difference in GRALT/ALT versus GRref/ref), whereas it was present and significant in ORX mice (increased cholesterol across fractions in GRALT/ALT versus GRref/ref; pink arrows) in both normal and atherogenic conditions (Figure 5D). ORX per se increased overall cholesterol levels, in line with prior studies in Ldlr-KO mice (51). In female mice at 4 months after surgery, the SNP effect was recapitulated in sham-operated mice and additive to the OVX-driven increase in cholesterol across fractions (red and pink arrows; Figure 5D). Also, in this case, OVX increased cholesterol levels per se compared with the sham group, in line with prior reports (52). We also analyzed plaque incidence as Oil Red O–based plaque/aorta surface ratio in en face aortas in atherogenic conditions. In males, the SNP effect was present only after ORX (pink arrows), while in females the SNP effect was recapitulated in the sham group and additive to OVX (red and pink arrows; Figure 5E). Finally, we counter-tested the overall endocrinological logic behind our sexual dimorphism hypothesis in our hiPSC-derived hepatocytes. Our GRALT/ALT and GRref/ref hiPSCs were all derived from the parental hiPSC line 72.3, which is a male cell line generated by the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) Pluripotent Stem Cell Facility from a male donor’s foreskin (CCHMCi001-A cell line on Cellosaurus) with a normal human male karyotype shown in the original publication describing this line (53). We also reconfirmed the male cellular sex in hiPSC hepatocytes by verifying higher expression of androgen over estrogen receptor by qPCR (AR, ESR1 genes; Figure 5F). Considering these cells are grown and differentiated as naive to sex hormones in vitro, we asked whether androgen receptor (AR) agonism could oppose the SNP effect in vitro. We focused on HDL and LDL uptake, both of which were significantly affected by the SNP effect in our prior findings in hiPSC-hepatocytes at baseline (i.e., in the absence of specific challenges). We tested HDL and LDL uptake at 24 hours after exposure to 100 nM Cl-4AS1, a steroidal AR agonist (54); or 100 nM β-estradiol; or vehicle. The SNP-driven loss of HDL and LDL uptake was recapitulated in the vehicle-treated hepatocytes (lower in GRALT/ALT and GRref/ref), yet Cl-4AS1 increased uptake of both particle types in both genotypes compared with vehicle, confirming the notion that the effects of AR agonism are independent from the genotype-driven effects in hepatocytes at the molecular level. We did not find significant changes with β-estradiol in these acute settings. Taken together, these results indicate that lower corticosterone and testosterone protect males from the SNP-driven elevation of cholesterol and atherosclerosis and that SNP effect is additive to estrogen loss in females.

Hormonal determinants of sexual dimorphism in the SNP effect.Figure 5

Hormonal determinants of sexual dimorphism in the SNP effect. (A) Serum corticosterone at its typical peak circadian time in mice ZT16 was assessed by ELISA and was higher in females than males of both control and mutant genotypes. (B) Western blot analyses in liver tissue showed that the molecular SNP effect on the identified protein cascade (increased PCSK9 and BHLHE40, decreased LDLR and SR-B1) was present in males, but the effect magnitude was significantly higher in females. (C) Experimental plan for gonadectomy experiment with ELISA-based validation of serum testosterone or estradiol depletion in WT mice on regular chow at 2 weeks after surgery. (D) In male mice, orchiectomy unmasked the SNP effect on increased cholesterol across lipoprotein fractions in either normal (WT background with regular chow) or proatherogenic (hAPOE*2/*2 background with Western diet) conditions (pink arrows). In females, the SNP effect was recapitulated in sham mice (red arrows) and maintained after ovariectomy (red arrows). Scales of y axes are different between normal and atherogenic conditions to adapt to the different cholesterol levels. (E) In atherogenic conditions, orchiectomy unmasked the SNP effect on male plaque/aorta surface ratio (pink arrows); in females the SNP effect was additive to the ovariectomy effect on the aorta plaque profile (red and pink arrows). (F) Male hiPSC-hepatocytes showed higher mRNA expression of the AR than the ER per qPCR. The hepatocyte-autonomous protective effect of the AR agonist Cl-4AS1 on HDL or LDL uptake was modest but significant in vitro in both control and mutant genotypes. We did not detect significant changes induced by estradiol. Scale bars: 100 μm. n = 3–5/sex/group; 2-way ANOVA and Šidák’s test; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. bg, background; CL-4, CL-4AS1, AR agonist; estrad, β-estradiol.

Discussion

The GR is well known for its involvement in orchestrating large gene programs and modulating hepatic lipid and glucose metabolism. However, the precise mechanisms by which hepatic GR governs cholesterol regulation remain elusive. Despite the well-established association between chronic glucocorticoid exposure and hypercholesterolemia with concomitant metabolic stress (55), a direct link between GR and atherosclerosis remains unclear. In this study, we leveraged a naturally occurring human mutation, the rs6190 SNP, to unveil a direct GR-mediated program governing hepatic cholesterol regulation and its consequential implication for atherogenic risk. We focused here on the hepatic transactivation targets of the mutant GR based on ChIP-Seq/RNA-Seq overlay, and consequently validated Pcsk9 and Bhlhe40 as mediators of the SNP effect on LDLR and SR-B1 levels in the liver, as well as on overall cholesterol levels and atherosclerosis in the hAPOE*2/*2 background. We recognize that our study did not address potential mutant GR effects on apolipoproteins (e.g., ApoE itself) or macrophages, both critical determinants of atherosclerosis and in turn regulated by glucocorticoids and/or GR (13, 14). Although they are beyond the focus of the present study, these are compelling questions to address to expand significance of our findings for overall hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis risk in SNP carriers.

Our mixed-model regressions in the UK Biobank and the All of Us datasets have unveiled an unexpected association between the rs6190 SNP and modest but significant elevations of total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol in women. Importantly, the impact of the rs6190 genetic variant demonstrated an additive effect based on SNP zygosity (i.e., according to the number of “risk” alleles). Additionally, in the UK Biobank, the rs6190 SNP correlated with increased odds ratio for hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular-related mortality. It was compelling to find analogous correlations in 2 cohorts that are quite different with regard to genetic ancestry composition. In the All of Us cohort, the highest minor allele frequency for the SNP was in individuals with European ancestry and closely matched the minor allele frequency of the UK Biobank, where “white British ancestry” accounts for almost 90% of the cohort (56). Beyond SNP correlations in human datasets, we sought to gain the mechanistic insight in mice and hiPSCs of the extent to which the rs6190 SNP is sufficient to regulate cholesterol. Our findings in murine liver and hiPSC-derived hepatocytes showed the SNP is indeed sufficient to elevate cholesterol and promote atherosclerosis through a specific change in the GR activity. In principle, this is a mechanism of SNP action that is independent from the genomic context, and future studies will be needed to articulate the genetic modifiers that potentiate or contrast this mechanism across ancestries in the human population. Variants in the NR3C1 gene are generally not significant enough to associate with cholesterol changes in GWAS studies with a typical P value threshold of 5 × 10–8. Indeed, variants like rs6190 are low frequency or rare and have modest effects on complex metabolic traits. Our study combined candidate variant analyses with rigorous mechanistic dissection in mice and hiPSCs to “unmask” the rs6190 role in GR biology and cholesterol regulation. It will be intriguing in the future to use analogous study settings to delve into the noncoding variants we found associated with total cholesterol in the All of Us dataset and to dissect whether they influence the rs6190 SNP effect as genetic modifiers or in haplotypes.

Given the well-established role of GR as a potent transcription factor, we examined the potential alterations in the epigenetic activity of GR induced by the rs6190 mutation. At the molecular level, our findings revealed that the mutant GR exhibited increased epigenetic activity and nuclear translocation, leading to the differential expression of 236 genes, including key regulators of cholesterol metabolism. Notably, the mutant GR upregulated Pcsk9, a key regulator of VLDL receptor and LDLR degradation, and Bhlhe40, a circadian transcriptional repressor that is implicated in SR-B1 control. At present, additional experiments are required to ascertain the extent to which the increase in cholesterol is independent of general changes in lipidemia. However, we emphasize that our regression analyses in women from the UK Biobank dataset took into account triacylglycerols as a covariate and still found a significant zygosity-dependent effect on total and LDL cholesterol. We also wish to note that the knockdown experiment with Pcsk9 and Bhlhe40 in SNP-bearing atherogenic mice blunted but did not completely remove the SNP effect on hypercholesterolemia and plaques. This suggests additional pathways elicited by rs6190 in atherosclerosis risk regulation that future studies will have to dissect.

To confirm the conservation of the SNP-mediated mechanism, we utilized isogenic hiPSC-derived hepatocytes carrying the rs6190 SNP. These hiPSC-derived hepatocytes exhibited increased expression of PCSK9 and BHLHE40, consistent with murine model findings. Moreover, these hepatocytes demonstrated reduced uptake of HDL and LDL cholesterol, providing direct evidence that the SNP influences cholesterol regulation and this mechanism is conserved in human cells. Although the rs6190 SNP is described in ClinVar as associated with “glucocorticoid resistance,” our analyses in hiPSCs and hiPSC-derived hepatocytes revealed that the mutant GR is more susceptible to glucocorticoid-induced activation than the reference GR isoform. This observation suggests that the SNP may confer increased “glucocorticoid sensitivity” in addition to its effects on cholesterol regulation. The evidence in support of “glucocorticoid resistance” is mostly limited to one study, where targeted limited analyses found that rs6190 decreased dexamethasone-driven activation of GILZa in immune cells (57). However, several subsequent studies have failed to find correlation between rs6190 and reduced sensitivity to glucocorticoids, including the seminal study that first discovered the rs6190 polymorphism (22, 27, 55, 58–61). Further in vitro experiments are warranted to investigate the extent to which the mutant GR activates the identified glucocorticoid response elements dependently or independently from other key nuclear factors for cholesterol regulation.

Finally, our results with corticosterone and gonadectomies in vivo indicate that the sexual dimorphism in the rs6190 effect on cholesterol and atherosclerosis elevation (higher in women and female mice than in men and male mice) results from the interaction between a sex-independent molecular program and a sex-specific endocrinological effect. The SNP effect on the mutant GR transactivation program is sex-independent, as shown by target liver protein changes in both sexes in mice. However, the “conversion” of this program into actual changes in cholesterol and atherosclerosis depends on the superimposed endocrinological signals of corticosterone and sex hormones. Corticosterone is typically higher in female mice compared with male mice without specific stress challenges (50), and this could find a parallel in humans, as shown by an observational study with salivary cortisol in 1,671 people that reported higher levels of morning cortisol and delta cortisol (morning–evening cortisol) for women than men in the absence of known specific stressors (62). In our mice, the higher corticosterone in females was additive to the SNP-based change in the liver GR transactivation program compared with males. This finding opens the idea of corticosterone as potential “dimorphic pressure” to consider in the case of sex-different GR processes beyond cholesterol. With regard to cholesterol, our findings with gonadectomies are consistent with the reported protective effects of testosterone (51) and estrogens (52) in atherosclerosis. In the rs6190 case, testosterone appeared to work “against” the SNP program and indeed testosterone removal through ORX “unmasked” the SNP effect on cholesterol and atherosclerosis in male mice in vivo. Accordingly, a testosterone-mimic (Cl-4AS1) partially rescued the HDL-LDL uptake defect in male hiPSC-hepatocytes. We used male hiPSC-hepatocytes because all our SNP-mutant lines were CRISPR-derived from the same parental male line. Nonetheless, as hiPSC-hepatocytes are grown and differentiated outside the typical physiological sexual development of a body, the cells recapitulated the SNP-driven GR transactivation cascade at the molecular level in vitro. Future comparisons with male and female hiPSC lines — ideally from different genetic backgrounds — are required to resolve the extent to which chromosomal sex impacts the effects of rs6190 in pluripotent and differentiated states. Our findings with corticosterone and testosterone are consistent with the seminal finding of a cholesterol signal for rs6190 in women but not men of both the UK Biobank and All of Us cohorts. They are also consistent with a previous study that found a significant association between rs6190 and sexually dimorphic cholesterol changes in a small cohort with heterozygous SNP carriers (18). We also found that estrogen loss through OVX is additive to the SNP effect on cholesterol and plaque incidence in female mice. This finding suggests that the SNP genotype could interact with menopause as additive atherosclerosis risk in older women, but specific studies are required to disentangle that interaction from social determinants of health and other complex variables like genetic ancestry, aging-related comorbidities, hormonal interventions/variations, and lifestyle.

Limitations of this study. Besides specific limitations and considerations reported above for specific results, in this study we have not formally assessed the impact of the single amino acid change (R>K) on the N-terminus structure or the overall conformation of the GR. Moreover, based on the initial cholesterol signal in the human datasets, we focused on liver GR and cholesterol. However, the SNP is expected to affect the GR in virtually every tissue, and additional studies are required to dissect the extent and mechanisms of rs6190-driven changes in the physiological GR action in other tissues. Lastly, while focusing on the upstream genetic, epigenetic, and molecular mechanisms related to cholesterol regulation by the GR, we recognize that our study did not address the translational question of whether rs6190 affects the efficacy of the current strategies for lowering cholesterol.

Conclusions and overall impact. In conclusion, our study leverages the rs6190 SNP as a genetic linchpin to advance our understanding of the GR-driven regulation of cholesterol through genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. Our data support early and proactive monitoring for cholesterol in carriers of this nonrare variant, particularly in women.

Methods

Methods for circulating cholesterol, hormones, RNA-Seq, ChIP-Seq, Western blot, hiPSC maintenance, albumin, hepatocyte isolation, immunostaining, nuclear/cytoplasmic fractions, and co-IP are available in the supplemental materials.

Sex as a biological variable. Our seminal screening of UK Biobank NMR metabolomics datasets was disaggregated by sex, considering the known outsized role of sexual dimorphism on virtually all listed metabolic parameters. Subsequent correlations and zygosity stratifications were also then performed as disaggregated by sex, and data from both sexes are reported. In mice, analyses were also performed as disaggregated by sex, and data from both males and females are presented. For hiPSC-based experiments, only male cells were used because all our control and mutant cell lines were derived from the seminal male hiPSC line CCHMCi001-A (RRID: CVCL_A1BW). Despite this limitation, these cells were able to model in vitro the molecular SNP effect on the GR transactivation cascade.

Animals and diet. Mice used in this study were maintained in a pathogen-free facility in accordance with the American Veterinary Medical Association and under a protocol fully approved by the IACUC at CCHMC (2023-0002). Euthanasia of the mice was carried out in accordance with ethical guidelines. Carbon dioxide inhalation was utilized as the initial method for euthanasia, followed by cervical dislocation and removal of the liver tissue.

All animals were maintained in a temperature-controlled environment with a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle. For the fasting group, mice were subjected to an 18-hour starvation period. Mutant GR mice were generated using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in the zygote by genocopying the rs6190 SNP in the endogenous Nr3c1 locus on the C57BL/6J background. For gRNA, primers were CCAGCAGTTTGCTTGGCCGGGGGagg; ssODN to introduce SNP and 5 silent mutations to introduce BamHI site and avoid CRISPR recut: CTGGTAGAGACGAAGTCCCCAGCAGTTTGCTTGGCAGAGGCAAGGGATCCGTGATGGACTTGTATAAAACCCTG. Correct SNP insertion without frameshift or deletions was verified through sequencing using the primers Fw-TGTACATTTAGCGAGTGGCAGGAT and Rev-ACGACTCGGAAAACTTTTTAGTTC. Routine genotyping during colony maintenance was performed through PCR with the same primers followed by BamHI digestion, yielding a 474 bp band for the WT allele and 140 plus 334 bp bands for the SNP allele. This genetic modification was performed by the Transgenic Animal and Genome Editing Core Facility at CCHMC. To ensure genetic background homogeneity and control for potential confounding variables, the colonies were maintained through heterozygous matings. This approach allowed us to compare 3 distinct groups of mice as littermates: GRref/ref (control WT), GRref/ALT (heterozygous SNP carriers), and GRALT/ALT (homozygous SNP carriers). The age of mice for each experiment is specified in the figures and Results. As the primary atherogenic model, hAPOE*2/*2 homozygous mice were originally obtained from Nobuyo Maeda’s laboratory at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (47) and maintained as a breeding colony in-house. These mice were crossed with the R24K mutant mice. To induce hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis, R24K mice crossed on an hAPOE*2/*2 background were subjected to a cholate-free Western diet, which contained 21% fat and 0.2% cholesterol, for 16 weeks.

At 1 month of age, both male and female GRref/ref and GRALT/ALT mice underwent either gonadectomy or sham operations. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with 2% isoflurane. For OVX and ORX, a midline incision was made to access and remove ovaries or testicles, respectively. Sham-operated animals underwent identical surgical procedures without gonadal removal. Blood samples were collected from tail vein sampling for serum isolation and hormone analyses at 2 weeks after surgery. R24K mice on the WT C57BL/6J background were fed with a normal chow diet; R24K mice on hAPOE*2/*2 background were administered a Western diet. Sixteen weeks after surgery, mice were fasted overnight and euthanized at ZT4 to control for circadian and feeding variables.

For systemic AAV experiments, WT and homozygous SNP-mutant littermate mice on an hAPOE*2/*2 background were injected retro-orbitally while under inhaled isoflurane anesthesia with either 3 × 1013 vg/mouse of AAV8-scramble shRNA or 1 × 1013 vg/mouse for each of the knockdown combination vectors, that is, 1 AAV8-antiPcsk9 (49) and 2 AAV8-Bhlhe40shRNA vectors (Vector Builder vectors VB010000-0023jze, VB230421-1310pka, VB230421-1312ydp; Addgene plasmid 163025; scramble shRNA sequence: CCTAAGGTTAAGTCGCCCTCG; anti-Bhlhe40 shRNA sequences: GCGAGGTTACAGTGTTTATAT, GTAGTGGTTTGGGCAAATTTC). All AAV8 injections were diluted in sterile PBS. To prepare and isolate AAV virions, we followed the procedures we previously reported (63, 64).

Lipoprotein analysis. For lipoprotein separation through FPLC, fresh plasma samples were pooled, totaling 250 μL, obtained from at least 5 mice per group. Each group’s pooled plasma underwent FPLC gel filtration, utilizing a tandem arrangement of 2 Superose 6 columns (GE Healthcare). The elution process entailed the collection of fractions in 0.5 mL increments, maintaining a steady flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. This procedure yielded a total of 51 distinct fractions, each of which was subjected to quantification of total triglyceride and cholesterol levels using the Infinity Triglyceride and Cholesterol kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog TR22421 and catalog TR13421).

Atherosclerotic lesion analysis. Mice under anesthesia were subjected to a perfusion procedure using a 10% formalin solution in buffered saline for 5 minutes. After this perfusion, the hearts were carefully dissected to harvest aortic roots. These harvested tissues were subsequently preserved in 10% buffered formalin solution. To assess the distribution of atherosclerosis, en face whole-aorta lesion staining was performed with Oil Red O for 30 minutes, followed by two 1× PBS washes. The aortic root of the heart was embedded in OCT compound for the preparation of frozen sections. Cross-cryosections of the aortic roots, measuring 7 μm in thickness and encompassing the aortic valve region, were stained with H&E, Oil Red O, and trichrome according to our established protocols. Images were obtained using a ZEISS Axio Imager.A2 microscope, and histological analyses were performed using ImageJ software (NIH).

hiPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cell differentiation in vitro. Human iPSC lines were CRISPR/Cas9 engineered for the SNP knockin by the Transgenic Animal and Genome Editing Core Facility and the hiPSC facility at CCHMC from the founder hiPSC line 72.3 (CCHMCi001-A cell line on Cellosaurus). For gRNA, primers were GCAGTGTGCTTGCTCAGGAGagg; ssODN to introduce SNP and 3 silent mutations to avoid CRISPR recut: AAGCGACAGCCAGTGAGGGTGAAGACGCAGAAACCTTCACAGTAGCTCCTCCTCTTAGGGTTTTATAGAAGTCCATCACATCTCCCtTCTCtTGgGCAAGCACACTGCTGGGGTTTTCTTCTCTACCAGGAGT. SNP genotype was verified through Sanger sequencing using the PCR primers Fw-GCTGCCTCTTACTAATCGGATCAG and Rev-AGTCTTCGCTGCTTGGAGTCTG. When human iPSCs reached a confluency of approximately 95%, they were passaged with Accutase Cell Dissociation Reagent (07920, StemCell Technologies) and resuspended as single cells in mTesR1 medium with 10 μM Y-27632 (Tocris Bioscience). The cells were seeded in 6-well plates precoated with Cultrex diluted in ice-cold DMEM/F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After 24 hours, the cells were washed with room temperature DMEM/F12 and switched to RPMI 1640 (11875093, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with B27 supplement Minus Insulin (A1895601, Thermo Fisher Scientific), along with 100 ng/mL Activin A (120-14P, PeproTech) and 3 μM CHIR99021 (4423, Tocris Bioscience). After 24 hours of treatment, CHIR99021 was withdrawn, and the cells were treated with RPMI 1690/B27 Minus Insulin basal medium with 100 ng/mL Activin A for another 48 hours and renewed every day to generate definitive endoderm cells. The differentiated endoderm cells were further treated with RPMI 1640/B27 Minus Insulin along with 10 ng/mL basic FGF (3100-18B, PeproTech) and 20 ng/mL bone morphogenic factor 4 (120-05ET, PeproTech). The media was replaced every day for the next 5 days to generate hepatic progenitor cells. Next, the hepatic progenitors were further differentiated into immature hepatocytes by replacing the media with RPMI/B27 Minus Insulin, 20 ng/mL hepatocyte growth factor (100-39, PeproTech), and 0.5% DMSO. The media was replaced every day for the next 5 days. To promote maturation of immature hepatocytes, the media was replaced with HCM Hepatocyte Culture Medium BulletKit (CC-3198, Lonza) except EGF, 10 ng/mL HGF, 20 ng/mL Oncostatin M (300-10T, PeproTech), 100 nM dexamethasone (D2915, Sigma-Aldrich), and 0.5% DMSO for another 5 days with a media change every day.

For the GR translocation assay and analysis, hiPSCs were exposed to either a vehicle control or 1 μM dexamethasone for various time intervals (20, 40, 60, and 120 minutes). Subsequently, an immunofluorescence assay was performed. To evaluate GR translocation in hiPSC-derived mature hepatocyte-like cells, the maturation medium containing 100 nM dexamethasone was removed, and the cells were cultured in hepatocyte maintenance medium without dexamethasone for 24 hours. The following day, mature hepatocyte-like cells were treated with either vehicle control or 1 μM dexamethasone for the aforementioned time intervals. Immunofluorescent staining was performed using GR (sc-393232, 1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and Alexa Fluor 488 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) (102650-156, 1:300, VWR). The analysis of GR translocation was carried out using ImageJ software on 5–6 images per sample acquired from a Nikon Eclipse Ti-U microscope.

Fluorometric HDL and LDL uptake assay and quantitation. First, 3 × 104 to 4 × 104 cells/well were plated in 96-well white clear-bottom cell culture plates and cultured in media overnight in a 37°C incubator. The next day, the cells were washed with assay buffer provided in the kit (see below). For fluorometric HDL (ab204717, Abcam) and LDL (770230-9, Kalen Biomedical) staining and quantitation, we followed the manufacturer’s instructions, protected samples from light, and measured the fluorescence in a microplate reader. For hormone treatment experiments, iPSCs were differentiated into hepatocytes in 96-well plates. At the end of the differentiation process, cells were treated with vehicle, 100 nM testosterone, or 100 nM estradiol for 24 hours. Subsequently, cells were washed with assay buffer, and HDL and LDL uptake assays were performed as described above. All the procedures were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions to ensure assay integrity and reproducibility.

UK Biobank and All of Us analyses. Our analyses were conducted under the UK Biobank application number 65846 and All of Us workspace number aou-rw-0fb52975. We constructed an rs6190 genotype-stratified cohort, excluding participants if they withdrew consent. All available values for the tested parameters were collected per genotype group. The following were the UK Biobank, unique data identifier, and related parameters for age: 21001-0.0; BMI: 21001-0.0; glycemia (mM): 30740-0.0; triglycerides (mM): 30870-0.0; total cholesterol: 23400; ICD10 causes of death: primary 40001, secondary 40002. For initial discovery using the NMR metabolomics datasets, quantitative linear regression and conditional analyses were performed using an additive genetic model adjusting for 10 principal components, sex, and age. In conditional analyses, the 12 established SNP dosage effects were also included as additional covariates. Regression analyses were performed using the second generation of PLINK (65). Before analyses, a series of standard quality control measures were applied: sample call rates, sample relatedness, sex inconsistency, and marker quality, that is, marker call rate, minor allele frequency (MAF), and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). Analyses were limited to participants with call rates greater than 98%, SNPs with call rates greater than 99%, SNPs with MAF greater than 1%, and HWE P values greater than 0.0001. For independent association confirmation studies, multiple linear regression analysis was carried out using R 4.3.2 (R Core Team, 2023) to explore the association of total, clinical LDL, and HDL cholesterol versus separate sex (males/females) and correcting for BMI, glycemia, and triglycerides.

IP with bead-antibody conjugation and LC-MS/MS analysis. IP of proteins, minimizing contamination from antibody heavy and light chains, was performed using the Pierce Co-IP Kit (26149, Invitrogen). Briefly, 10–75 μg of antibody (anti-GR, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, catalog SC- 393232) was conjugated to the AminoLink Plus Coupling Resin using a coupling buffer containing sodium cyanoborohydride as the conjugation reagent. The reaction was carried out in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube using a thermomixer at room temperature for 2 hours. Simultaneously, protein extracts were precleared with control agarose resins for 1 hour. After preclearing, the resin was washed with a series of quenching and wash buffers. The eluted precleared protein extracts were then incubated with the antibody-conjugated AminoLink resin overnight at 4°C. The next day, the resin was washed with wash buffer, and the bound proteins were eluted using 50 μL of elution buffer. The eluted protein samples were analyzed via SDS-PAGE, silver staining, and Western blot to confirm the presence of antibody-free IP proteins. Once validated, the samples were submitted to the LC-MS/MS protein core at University of Cincinnati Proteomics Laboratory. For LC-MS/MS analysis, protein samples were dried using a SpeedVac and resuspended in 35 μL of 1× elution buffer. The samples were loaded and ran for 1.5 cm into an Invitrogen 4%–12% Bis-Tris gel using MOPS buffer, with molecular weight marker lanes included for reference. Gel sections were excised, reduced with DTT, alkylated with iodoacetamide, and digested overnight with trypsin. The resulting peptides were extracted, dried using a SpeedVac, and resuspended in 0.1% formic acid. A total of 500 ng to 2 μg of each sample was analyzed by nano LC-MS/MS using an Orbitrap Eclipse mass spectrometer. The data were searched against a combined database of contaminants and the SwissProt Mus musculus database using Proteome Discoverer version 3.0 with the Sequest HT search algorithm (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Statistics. Unless otherwise noted, statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software v8.4.1. The Pearson-D’Agostino normality test was used to assess data distribution normality. When comparing the 2 groups, a 2-tailed Student’s t test with Welch’s correction (unequal variances) was used. When comparing 3 groups of data from 1 variable, 1-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple-comparison test was used. When comparing data groups for more than 1 related variable, 2-way ANOVA was used. For ANOVA and t test analyses, a P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. When the number of data points was less than 10, data were presented as single values (dot plots, histograms). Tukey distribution bars were used to emphasize data range distribution in analyses pooling larger data point sets per group (typically more than 10 data points). Analyses pooling data points over time were presented as line plots connecting medians of box plots showing distribution of all data per time points. Randomization and blinding practices were followed for all experiments. All the data from all animal cohorts and cell clone replicates are reported, whether outlier or not.

Study approval. Mice were housed in a pathogen-free facility in accordance with the American Veterinary Medical Association and under protocols fully approved by the IACUC at CCHMC (2022-0020, 2023-0002). UK Biobank and All of Us analyses were conducted under the UK Biobank application number 65846 and All of Us workspace number aou-rw-0fb52975.

Data availability. RNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq datasets reported here are available in the NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession numbers GSE280494 and GSE280572. Ddata for all charts presented here are available in the Supporting Data Values file.

Author contributions

HBD, AH, GN, ADP, KM, HL, AR, OA, and BNK curated data and conducted formal analysis and investigation. DYH provided resources. MQ conceptualized the study, conducted formal analysis, acquired funding, and supervised the study.

Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View Unedited blot and gel images

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

Next-generation sequencing was performed thanks to the CCHMC DNA Sequencing and Genotyping Facility (RRID: SCR_022630), with critical assistance by David Fletcher, Keely Icardi, Julia Flynn, and Taliesin Lenhart. hiPSC generation, engineering, and initial quality control/selection were performed thanks to the CCHMC Pluripotent Stem Cell Facility (RRID: SCR_022634), with critical assistance by Chris Mayhew and Yueh-Chiang Hu. pAAV Alb-AAT KRAB-SadCas9 U6-mPcsk9 was a gift from Tonia Rex (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; RRID: Addgene plasmid 163025).

This work was supported by R56HL158531-01, R01HL166356-01, R03DK130908-01A1, R01AG078174-01 (all from NIH), Hevolution Award (AFAR), CHMC Research Innovation/Pilot Funding Program (RIP), GAP Funding Program, CCRF Endowed Scholarship, and HI Translational Funds (CCHMC) grants (to MQ); and NIH grant R01HL156954 (to DYH).

Address correspondence to: Mattia Quattrocelli, Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 240 Albert Sabin Way T4.676, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Phone: 1.513.517.1221; Email: mattia.quattrocelli@cchmc.org.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: MQ is listed as coinventor on a patent application related to intermittent glucocorticoid use filed by Northwestern University (PCT/US2019/068618), unrelated to any aspects of this study.

Copyright: © 2025, Durumutla et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2025;135(17):e190180.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI190180.

References
  1. El Khoudary SR, et al. Menopause transition and cardiovascular disease risk: implications for timing of early prevention: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142(25):506–532.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Hodgin JB, Maeda N. Minireview: estrogen and mouse models of atherosclerosis. Endocrinology. 2002;143(12):4495–4501.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Cupido AJ, et al. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol attributable cardiovascular disease risk is sex specific. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(12):e024248.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. de Guia RM, et al. Glucocorticoid hormones and energy homeostasis. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2014;19(2):117–128.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Schaaf MJ, Cidlowski JA. Molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid action and resistance. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;83(1-5):37–48.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Lim HW, et al. Genomic redistribution of GR monomers and dimers mediates transcriptional response to exogenous glucocorticoid in vivo. Genome Res. 2015;25(6):836–844.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Oakley RH, Cidlowski JA. The biology of the glucocorticoid receptor: new signaling mechanisms in health and disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(5):1033–1044.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Watts LM, et al. Reduction of hepatic and adipose tissue glucocorticoid receptor expression with antisense oligonucleotides improves hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia in diabetic rodents without causing systemic glucocorticoid antagonism. Diabetes. 2005;54(6):1846–1853.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Petrichenko IE, et al. Glucocorticoids stimulate cholesteryl ester formation in human smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17(6):1143–1151.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Nashel DJ. Is atherosclerosis a complication of long-term corticosteroid treatment? Am J Med. 1986;80(5):925–929.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. MacLeod C, et al. Glucocorticoids: fuelling the fire of atherosclerosis or therapeutic extinguishers? Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(14):7622.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Pujades-Rodriguez M, et al. Dose-dependent oral glucocorticoid cardiovascular risks in people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(12):e1003432.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Trusca VG, et al. Differential action of glucocorticoids on apolipoprotein E gene expression in macrophages and hepatocytes. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0174078.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Ayaori M, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor regulates ATP-binding cassette transporter-A1 expression and apolipoprotein-mediated cholesterol efflux from macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26(1):163–168.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Cavenee WK, et al. Regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis in HeLa S3G cells by serum lipoproteins: dexamethasone-mediated interference with suppression of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978;75(5):2103–2107.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. van Rossum EF, Lamberts SW. Polymorphisms in the glucocorticoid receptor gene and their associations with metabolic parameters and body composition. Recent Prog Horm Res. 2004;59:333–357.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Yudt MR, Cidlowski JA. The glucocorticoid receptor: coding a diversity of proteins and responses through a single gene. Mol Endocrinol. 2002;16(8):1719–1726.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. van Rossum EF, et al. A polymorphism in the glucocorticoid receptor gene, which decreases sensitivity to glucocorticoids in vivo, is associated with low insulin and cholesterol levels. Diabetes. 2002;51(10):3128–3134.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Kino T. Single nucleotide variations of the human gr gene manifested as pathologic mutations or polymorphisms. Endocrinology. 2018;159(7):2506–2519.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. van Rossum EF, et al. Association of the ER22/23EK polymorphism in the glucocorticoid receptor gene with survival and C-reactive protein levels in elderly men. Am J Med. 2004;117(3):158–162.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Hu W, et al. Individual-specific functional epigenomics reveals genetic determinants of adverse metabolic effects of glucocorticoids. Cell Metab. 2021;33(8):1592–1609.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Koper JW, et al. Lack of association between five polymorphisms in the human glucocorticoid receptor gene and glucocorticoid resistance. Hum Genet. 1997;99(5):663–668.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Saadatagah S, et al. Author Correction: Genetic basis of hypercholesterolemia in adults. NPJ Genom Med. 2021;6(1):56.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Trapani L, et al. Regulation and deregulation of cholesterol homeostasis: The liver as a metabolic “power station”. World J Hepatol. 2012;4(6):184–190.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. GTEx Consortium. The genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet. 2013;45(6):580–585.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Weikum ER, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor control of transcription: precision and plasticity via allostery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(3):159–174.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Russo P, et al. FKBP5 rs4713916: a potential genetic predictor of interindividual different response to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a real-life setting. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(8):2024.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Zannas AS, et al. Gene-stress-epigenetic regulation of FKBP5: clinical and translational implications. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41(1):261–274.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Hollstein T, et al. Treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors reduces atherogenic VLDL remnants in a real-world study. Vascul Pharmacol. 2019;116:8–15.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Canuel M, et al. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) can mediate degradation of the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP-1). PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64145.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Maxwell KN, et al. Overexpression of PCSK9 accelerates the degradation of the LDLR in a post-endoplasmic reticulum compartment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(6):2069–2074.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Lagace TA. PCSK9 and LDLR degradation: regulatory mechanisms in circulation and in cells. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2014;25(5):387–393.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Azmi S, et al. mSharp-1/DEC2, a basic helix-loop-helix protein functions as a transcriptional repressor of E box activity and Stra13 expression. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(22):20098–20109.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Honma S, et al. Dec1 and Dec2 are regulators of the mammalian molecular clock. Nature. 2002;419(6909):841–844.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Rouillard AD, et al. The harmonizome: a collection of processed datasets gathered to serve and mine knowledge about genes and proteins. Database (oxford). 2016;2016:baw100.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Shen WJ, et al. SR-B1: a unique multifunctional receptor for cholesterol influx and efflux. Annu Rev Physiol. 2018;80:95–116.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Hamilton KA, et al. Mice lacking the transcriptional regulator Bhlhe40 have enhanced neuronal excitability and impaired synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0196223.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Peters DT, et al. Asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 is a specific cell-surface marker for isolating hepatocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Development. 2016;143(9):1475–1481.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Lu H, et al. Crosstalk of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4a and glucocorticoid receptor in the regulation of lipid metabolism in mice fed a high-fat-high-sugar diet. Lipids Health Dis. 2022;21(1):46.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Oyadomari S, et al. The gene for hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-4alpha is activated by glucocorticoids and glucagon, and repressed by insulin in rat liver. FEBS Lett. 2000;478(1-2):141–146.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Engblom D, et al. Direct glucocorticoid receptor-Stat5 interaction in hepatocytes controls body size and maturation-related gene expression. Genes Dev. 2007;21(10):1157–1162.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Bharathan SP, et al. Systematic evaluation of markers used for the identification of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Biol Open. 2017;6(1):100–108.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Wang P, et al. A molecular signature for purified definitive endoderm guides differentiation and isolation of endoderm from mouse and human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21(12):2273–2287.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Ghosheh N, et al. Highly synchronized expression of lineage-specific genes during in vitro hepatic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cell lines. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:8648356.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Siller R, et al. Small-molecule-driven hepatocyte differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2015;4(5):939–952.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. de Villiers WJ, et al. The apolipoprotein E2 (Arg145Cys) mutation causes autosomal dominant type III hyperlipoproteinemia with incomplete penetrance. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17(5):865–872.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Sullivan PM, et al. Type III hyperlipoproteinemia and spontaneous atherosclerosis in mice resulting from gene replacement of mouse Apoe with human Apoe*2. J Clin Invest. 1998;102(1):130–135.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Huang Y, et al. Hypolipidemic and hyperlipidemic phenotypes in transgenic mice expressing human apolipoprotein E2. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(46):29146–29151.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Backstrom JR, et al. Optimization of S. aureus dCas9 and CRISPRi elements for a single adeno-associated virus that targets an endogenous gene. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2020;19:139–148.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Malisch JL, et al. Baseline and stress-induced plasma corticosterone concentrations of mice selectively bred for high voluntary wheel running. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2007;80(1):146–156.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Hatch N, et al. Endogenous androgen deficiency enhances diet-induced hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. Gend Med. 2012;9(5):319–328.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Lei Z, et al. Ovariectomy impaired hepatic glucose and lipid homeostasis and altered the gut microbiota in mice with different diets. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:708838.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. McCracken KW, et al. Modelling human development and disease in pluripotent stem-cell-derived gastric organoids. Nature. 2014;516(7531):400–404.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Schmidt A, et al. Identification of anabolic selective androgen receptor modulators with reduced activities in reproductive tissues and sebaceous glands. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(52):36367–36376.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Brovkina AF, et al. [Influence of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and NR3C1 genes polymorphism on the effectiveness of glucocorticoid therapy in patients with endocrine ophthalmopathy]. Vestn Oftalmol. 2020;136(6. vyp. 2):125–132.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Constantinescu AE, et al. A framework for research into continental ancestry groups of the UK Biobank. Hum Genomics. 2022;16(1):3.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Russcher H, et al. Two polymorphisms in the glucocorticoid receptor gene directly affect glucocorticoid-regulated gene expression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(10):5804–5810.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. El-Fayoumi R, et al. Association between NR3C1 gene polymorphisms and toxicity induced by glucocorticoids therapy in saudi children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(5):1415–1423.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Roerink SH, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor polymorphisms modulate cardiometabolic risk factors in patients in long-term remission of Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrine. 2016;53(1):63–70.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Quax RA, et al. Polymorphisms in the glucocorticoid receptor gene and in the glucocorticoid-induced transcript 1 gene are associated with disease activity and response to glucocorticoid bridging therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35(8):1325–1333.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Bouma EM, et al. No associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms in corticoid receptor genes and heart rate and cortisol responses to a standardized social stress test in adolescents: the TRAILS study. Behav Genet. 2011;41(2):253–261.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Larsson CA, et al. Salivary cortisol differs with age and sex and shows inverse associations with WHR in Swedish women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2009;9:16.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Durumutla HB, et al. Glucocorticoid chronopharmacology promotes glucose metabolism in heart through a cardiomyocyte-autonomous transactivation program. JCI Insight. 2024;9(22):e182599.
    View this article via: JCI Insight CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Prabakaran AD, et al. Intermittent glucocorticoid treatment improves muscle metabolism via the PGC1α/Lipin1 axis in an aging-related sarcopenia model. J Clin Invest. 2024;134(11):e177427.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Chang CC, et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4:7.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (July 1, 2025): In-Press Preview
  • Version 2 (September 2, 2025): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts