While radiation is an effective oncologic therapy, killing cancer by inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), it lacks specificity for neoplastic cells. We have previously adapted the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology as a cancer-specific treatment modality targeting somatic mutations in pancreatic cancer (PC). However, its tumoricidal potential remains unclear, especially in comparison with therapeutic doses of radiation. Here, we demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs are more cytotoxic in PCs than a comparable number of radiation-induced DSBs. We observed more than 90% tumor growth inhibition by targeting 9 sites with cancer-specific sgRNAs. Through both bioinformatics and cytogenetics analyses, we found that CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs triggered ongoing chromosomal rearrangements, with 87% of structural variants not directly produced from the initial CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs, and chromosomal instability peaking before cell death. By comparing the cytotoxicity of CRISPR/Cas9- and radiation-induced DSBs, we demonstrated that the number of DSBs required to achieve equitoxic effects was approximately 3 times higher for radiation than CRISPR/Cas9. Finally, we showed that PC cells that had survived CRISPR/Cas9 targeting retained susceptibility to subsequent CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs at different genomic sites with more than 87% growth inhibition. Together, our data support the therapeutic potential of CRISPR/Cas9 as an anticancer strategy.
Selina Shiqing K. Teh, Akhil Kotwal, Alexis Bennett, Eitan Halper-Stromberg, Laura Morsberger, Saum Zamani, Yanan Shi, Alyza Skaist, Qingfeng Zhu, Kirsten Bowland, Hong Liang, Ralph H. Hruban, Chien-Fu Hung, Robert A. Anders, Nicholas J. Roberts, Robert B. Scharpf, Michael Goldstein, Ying S. Zou, James R. Eshleman
Usage data is cumulative from May 2026 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 223 | 0 |
| 38 | 0 | |
| Figure | 2 | 0 |
| Table | 2 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 6 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 1 | 0 |
| Totals | 272 | 0 |
| Total Views | 272 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.