Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Simultaneous CRISPR/Cas9-induced double-strand breaks are lethal in models of pancreatic cancer
Selina Shiqing K. Teh, Akhil Kotwal, Alexis Bennett, Eitan Halper-Stromberg, Laura Morsberger, Saum Zamani, Yanan Shi, Alyza Skaist, Qingfeng Zhu, Kirsten Bowland, Hong Liang, Ralph H. Hruban, Chien-Fu Hung, Robert A. Anders, Nicholas J. Roberts, Robert B. Scharpf, Michael Goldstein, Ying S. Zou, James R. Eshleman
Selina Shiqing K. Teh, Akhil Kotwal, Alexis Bennett, Eitan Halper-Stromberg, Laura Morsberger, Saum Zamani, Yanan Shi, Alyza Skaist, Qingfeng Zhu, Kirsten Bowland, Hong Liang, Ralph H. Hruban, Chien-Fu Hung, Robert A. Anders, Nicholas J. Roberts, Robert B. Scharpf, Michael Goldstein, Ying S. Zou, James R. Eshleman
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Genetics Oncology

Simultaneous CRISPR/Cas9-induced double-strand breaks are lethal in models of pancreatic cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

While radiation is an effective oncologic therapy, killing cancer by inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), it lacks specificity for neoplastic cells. We have previously adapted the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology as a cancer-specific treatment modality targeting somatic mutations in pancreatic cancer (PC). However, its tumoricidal potential remains unclear, especially in comparison with therapeutic doses of radiation. Here, we demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs are more cytotoxic in PCs than a comparable number of radiation-induced DSBs. We observed more than 90% tumor growth inhibition by targeting 9 sites with cancer-specific sgRNAs. Through both bioinformatics and cytogenetics analyses, we found that CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs triggered ongoing chromosomal rearrangements, with 87% of structural variants not directly produced from the initial CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs, and chromosomal instability peaking before cell death. By comparing the cytotoxicity of CRISPR/Cas9- and radiation-induced DSBs, we demonstrated that the number of DSBs required to achieve equitoxic effects was approximately 3 times higher for radiation than CRISPR/Cas9. Finally, we showed that PC cells that had survived CRISPR/Cas9 targeting retained susceptibility to subsequent CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSBs at different genomic sites with more than 87% growth inhibition. Together, our data support the therapeutic potential of CRISPR/Cas9 as an anticancer strategy.

Authors

Selina Shiqing K. Teh, Akhil Kotwal, Alexis Bennett, Eitan Halper-Stromberg, Laura Morsberger, Saum Zamani, Yanan Shi, Alyza Skaist, Qingfeng Zhu, Kirsten Bowland, Hong Liang, Ralph H. Hruban, Chien-Fu Hung, Robert A. Anders, Nicholas J. Roberts, Robert B. Scharpf, Michael Goldstein, Ying S. Zou, James R. Eshleman

×

Figure 2

Simultaneous CRISPR/Cas9 targeting inhibits tumor growth.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Simultaneous CRISPR/Cas9 targeting inhibits tumor growth.
(A–C) Tumor gr...
(A–C) Tumor growth experiment in subcutaneous xenograft models. Panc10.05 Cas9-expressing cells transduced with the following sgRNAs: NT, 715F(5), 230F(12), or a pool of 9 sgRNAs targeting different noncoding mutations unique to Panc10.05 (Panc10.05 pool) were injected into nude mice for tumor growth. (A) Percentage of tumors present postxenograft. # indicates absence of 2 data points due to early death around week 5 (33–36 days). (B) Tumor volume measurements postxenograft. Dunn-Šidák test between NT and the other treatment groups on week 6, all ****P < 0.0001. N = 10; mean ± SEM. & indicates absence of week 5 and 6 data points of 2 tumors due to early death. $ indicates absence of 2 data points from week 6 due to early death. (C) Tumor weight measurements on week 6 postxenograft. Dunnett’s test between NT (N = 8) and 715F(5): P = 0.0003 (N = 8), 230F(12): P = 0.0008 (N = 10), and Panc10.05 pool: P = 0.0004 (N = 10). ***P < 0.001. Mean ± SEM was shown. (D and E) Metastatic growth experiment in hemispleen injection mouse models of liver metastasis. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the liver sections of mice treated with (D) NT (N = 7) or (E) 230F(12) (N = 5) sgRNA-expressing PC cells. Black arrow: tumor growth; green arrow: tumor regression. The top and bottom panels represent liver sections from 2 different mice of the same treatment group. Images at 20× original magnification; scale bar is 100 μm.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts