Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
B cells shape naive CD8+ T cell programming
Cameron Manes, … , Ross M. Kedl, Jared Klarquist
Cameron Manes, … , Ross M. Kedl, Jared Klarquist
Published April 17, 2025
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2025;135(12):e190106. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI190106.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Autoimmunity Immunology

B cells shape naive CD8+ T cell programming

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The presence of B cells is essential for the formation of CD8+ T cell memory after infection and vaccination. In this study, we investigated whether B cells influence the programming of naive CD8+ T cells prior to their involvement in an immune response. RNA sequencing indicated that B cells are necessary for sustaining the FOXO1-controlled transcriptional program, which is critical for homeostasis of these T cells. Without an appropriate B cell repertoire, mouse naive CD8+ T cells exhibit a terminal, effector-skewed phenotype, which significantly impacts their response to vaccination. A similar effector-skewed phenotype with reduced FOXO1 expression was observed in naive CD8+ T cells from human patients undergoing B cell–depleting therapies. Furthermore, we show that patients without B cells have a defect in generating long-lived CD8+ T cell memory following COVID vaccination. In summary, we demonstrate that B cells promote the quiescence of naive CD8+ T cells, poising them to become memory cells upon vaccination.

Authors

Cameron Manes, Miguel Guerrero Moreno, Jennifer Cimons, Marc A. D’Antonio, Tonya M. Brunetti, Michael G. Harbell, Sean Selva, Christopher Mizenko, Tyler L. Borko, Erika L. Lasda, Jay R. Hesselberth, Elena W.Y. Hsieh, Michael R. Verneris, Amanda L. Piquet, Laurent Gapin, Ross M. Kedl, Jared Klarquist

×

Figure 4

The B cell environment in which a naive CD8+ T cell develops has significant consequences for its response to vaccination.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
The B cell environment in which a naive CD8+ T cell develops has signifi...
Four hundred purified OT1 T cells from WT and MD4 mice were mixed 1:1 and transferred i.v. into WT or MD4 recipients. Mice were then immediately vaccinated with the combined-adjuvant subunit vaccine [OVA, poly(I:C), and anti-CD40]. Seven days later, spleens were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Experimental schematic. (B) Representative tetramer staining on CD19−CD8+ lymphocytes (left), staining for CD45.1 and CD45.2 (middle) to identify tetramer+ cell origin, and staining for CD127 (right). (C) Percentage of tetramer+ cells positive for CD127. (D) The gMFI of CD127 staining on tetramer+CD127hi cells. (E) Total number of splenic tetramer+ cells. Data shown are means ± SEM, n = 5 mice per group, representative of 2 experiments. Significance was defined by 2-way ANOVA with Holm-Šidák multiple-comparison test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts