The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining intestinal homeostasis and influencing various aspects of host physiology, including immune function. Recent advances have highlighted the emerging importance of the complement system, particularly the C3 protein, as a key player in microbiota-host interactions. Traditionally known for its role in innate immunity, the complement system is now recognized for its interactions with microbial communities within the gut, where it promotes immune tolerance and protects against enteric infections. This Review explores the gut complement system as a possibly novel frontier in microbiota-host communication and examines its role in shaping microbial diversity, modulating inflammatory responses, and contributing to intestinal health. We discuss the dynamic interplay between microbiota-derived signals and complement activation, with a focus on the C3 protein and its effect on both the gut microbiome and host immune responses. Furthermore, we highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting complement pathways to restore microbial balance and treat diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. By elucidating the functions of the gut complement system, we offer insights into its potential as a target for microbiota-based interventions aimed at restoring intestinal homeostasis and preventing disease.
Xianbin Tian, Lan Zhang, Xinyang Qian, Yangqing Peng, Fengyixin Chen, Sarah Bengtson, Zhiqing Wang, Meng Wu
Usage data is cumulative from October 2025 through October 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,174 | 0 |
287 | 0 | |
Figure | 139 | 0 |
Table | 59 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 13 | 0 |
Totals | 1,672 | 0 |
Total Views | 1,672 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.