Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Emerging therapeutic strategies in breast cancer (Oct 2026)
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, but not dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, reduce alcohol intake
Mehdi Farokhnia, John Tazare, Claire L. Pince, Nicolaus Bruns VI, Joshua C. Gray, Vincent Lo Re III, David A. Fiellin, Henry R. Kranzler, George F. Koob, Amy C. Justice, Leandro F. Vendruscolo, Christopher T. Rentsch, Lorenzo Leggio
Mehdi Farokhnia, John Tazare, Claire L. Pince, Nicolaus Bruns VI, Joshua C. Gray, Vincent Lo Re III, David A. Fiellin, Henry R. Kranzler, George F. Koob, Amy C. Justice, Leandro F. Vendruscolo, Christopher T. Rentsch, Lorenzo Leggio
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Endocrinology Neuroscience

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, but not dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, reduce alcohol intake

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND Despite growing preclinical evidence that glucagon-like peptide1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) could be repurposed to treat alcohol use disorder (AUD), clinical evidence is scarce. Additionally, the potential impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) on alcohol intake is largely unknown.METHODS We conducted a large cohort study using 2008–2023 electronic health records data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Changes in Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) scores were compared between propensity-score–matched GLP-1RA recipients, DPP-4I recipients, and unexposed comparators. We further tested the effects of 2 DPP-4Is, linagliptin and omarigliptin, on binge-like alcohol drinking in mice and operant oral alcohol self administration in alcohol-dependent rats, models previously used to show a significant effect of the GLP-1RA semaglutide in reducing alcohol intake.RESULTS GLP-1RA recipients reported a greater reduction in AUDIT-C scores than unexposed individuals (difference-in-difference [DiD]: 0.09 [95% CI: 0.03, 0.14], P = 0.0025) and DPP-4I recipients (DiD: 0.11 [95% CI: 0.05,0.17], P = 0.0002). Reductions in drinking were more pronounced among individuals with baseline AUD (GLP-1RA versus unexposed: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.29,0.72], P < 0.0001; GLP-1RA versus DPP-4I: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.43,0.88], P < 0.0001) and baseline hazardous drinking (GLP-1RA versus unexposed: 1.38 [95% CI: 1.07,1.69], P < 0.0001; GLP-1RA versus DPP-4I: 1.00 [95% CI: 0.68,1.33], P < 0.0001). There were no differences between DPP-4I recipients and unexposed individuals. The latter results were confirmed via a reverse translational approach. Specifically, neither linagliptin nor omarigliptin reduced alcohol drinking in mice or rats. The rodent experiments also confirmed target engagemhent, as both DPP-4Is reduced blood glucose levels.CONCLUSION Convergent findings across humans, mice, and rats indicated that GLP-1RAs, but not DPP-4Is, reduce alcohol consumption and may be efficacious in treating AUD.FUNDING This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program (ZIA DA000635, ZIA DA000644, ZIA DA000602), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism extramural funding (R01 AA030041, P01 AA029545, U01 AA026224, U24 AA020794, U01 AA020790, U10 AA013566), the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01BX004820), and an Alkermes Pathways Research Award.

Authors

Mehdi Farokhnia, John Tazare, Claire L. Pince, Nicolaus Bruns VI, Joshua C. Gray, Vincent Lo Re III, David A. Fiellin, Henry R. Kranzler, George F. Koob, Amy C. Justice, Leandro F. Vendruscolo, Christopher T. Rentsch, Lorenzo Leggio

×

Usage data is cumulative from October 2025 through October 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 4,227 991
PDF 837 237
Figure 1,099 0
Table 193 0
Supplemental data 624 35
Citation downloads 372 0
Totals 7,352 1,263
Total Views 8,615

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts