Adams-Oliver syndrome (AOS) is a rare congenital disorder characterized by scalp, limb, and cardiovascular defects. Although variants in the NOTCH1 receptor, DLL4 ligand, and RBPJ transcription factor have been implicated in AOS, the driving tissue types and molecular mechanisms by which these variants cause pathogenesis are unknown. Here, we used quantitative binding assays to show that AOS-associated RBPJ missense variants compromise DNA binding but not cofactor binding. These findings suggest that AOS-associated RBPJ variants do not function as loss-of-function alleles but instead act as dominant-negative proteins that sequester cofactors from DNA. Consistent with this idea, mice carrying an AOS-associated Rbpj allele develop dominant phenotypes that include increased lethality and cardiovascular defects in a Notch1 heterozygous background, whereas Notch1 and Rbpj compound heterozygous null alleles are well tolerated. To facilitate studies into the tissues driving AOS pathogenesis, we employed conditional genetics to isolate the contribution of the vascular endothelium to the development of AOS-like phenotypes. Importantly, our studies show that expression of the Rbpj AOS allele in endothelial cells is both necessary and sufficient to cause lethality and cardiovascular defects. These data establish that reduced Notch1 signaling in the vasculature is a key driver of pathogenesis in this AOS mouse model.
Alyssa F. Solano, Kristina Preusse, Brittany Cain, Rebecca Hotz, Parthav Gavini, Zhenyu Yuan, Benjamin Bowen, Gabrielle Maco, Hope Neal, Ellen K. Gagliani, Christopher Ahn, Hee-Woong Lim, Laura Southgate, Rhett A. Kovall, Raphael Kopan, Brian Gebelein
Usage data is cumulative from October 2025 through February 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,365 | 42 |
| 813 | 16 | |
| Figure | 324 | 0 |
| Table | 306 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 303 | 5 |
| Citation downloads | 106 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,217 | 63 |
| Total Views | 4,280 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.