As antimicrobial resistance rises, new antibacterial candidates are urgently needed. Using sequence space information from over 14,743 functional antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), we improved the antimicrobial properties of citropin 1.1, an AMP with weak antimethicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) activity, producing a short and potent antistaphylococcal peptide, CIT-8 (13 residues). At 40 μg/mL, CIT-8 eradicated 1 × 108 drug-resistant MRSA and vancomycin resistant S. aureus (VRSA) persister cells within 30 minutes of exposure and reduced the number of viable biofilm cells of MRSA and VRSA by 3 log10 and 4 log10 in established biofilms, respectively. CIT-8 (at 32 μg/mL) depolarized and permeated the S. aureus MW2 membrane. In a mouse model of MRSA skin infection, CIT-8 (2% w/w in petroleum jelly) significantly reduced the bacterial burden by 2.3 log10 (P < 0.0001). Our methodology accelerated AMP design by combining traditional peptide design strategies, such as truncation, substitution, and structure-guided alteration, with machine learning–backed sequence optimization.
Biswajit Mishra, Anindya Basu, Fadi Shehadeh, LewisOscar Felix, Sai Sundeep Kollala, Yashpal Singh Chhonker, Mandar T. Naik, Charilaos Dellis, Liyang Zhang, Narchonai Ganesan, Daryl J. Murry, Jianhua Gu, Michael B. Sherman, Frederick M. Ausubel, Paul P. Sotiriadis, Eleftherios Mylonakis
Usage data is cumulative from April 2025 through November 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,505 | 243 |
| 673 | 90 | |
| Figure | 438 | 0 |
| Table | 138 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 249 | 33 |
| Citation downloads | 86 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,089 | 366 |
| Total Views | 4,455 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.