Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2025;135(8):e185292. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI185292.
Abstract
Induction of durable protective immune responses is the main goal of prophylactic vaccines, and adjuvants play a role as drivers of such responses. Despite advances in vaccine strategies, development of a safe and effective HIV vaccine remains a significant challenge. Use of an appropriate adjuvant is crucial to the success of HIV vaccines. Here we assessed the saponin/MPLA nanoparticle (SMNP) adjuvant with an HIV envelope (Env) trimer, evaluating the safety and effect of multiple variables — including adjuvant dose (16-fold dose range), immunization route, and adjuvant composition — on the establishment of Env-specific memory T and B cell (TMem and BMem) responses and long-lived plasma cells in nonhuman primates (NHPs). Robust BMem were detected in all groups, but a 6-fold increase was observed in the highest- versus the lowest-SMNP-dose group. Similarly, stronger vaccine responses were induced by the highest SMNP dose in CD40L+OX40+ CD4+ TMem (11-fold), IFN-γ+ CD4+ TMem (15-fold), IL21+ CD4+ TMem (9-fold), circulating T follicular helper cells (TFH; 3.6-fold), BM plasma cells (7-fold), and binding IgG (1.3-fold). Substantial tier 2 neutralizing antibodies were only observed in the higher-SMNP-dose groups. These investigations highlight the dose-dependent potency of SMNP and its relevance for human use and next-generation vaccines.
Authors
Parham Ramezani-Rad, Ester Marina-Zárate, Laura Maiorino, Amber Myers, Katarzyna Kaczmarek Michaels, Ivan S. Pires, Nathaniel I. Bloom, Mariane B. Melo, Ashley A. Lemnios, Paul G. Lopez, Christopher A. Cottrell, Iszac Burton, Bettina Groschel, Arpan Pradhan, Gabriela Stiegler, Magdolna Budai, Daniel Kumar, Sam Pallerla, Eddy Sayeed, Sangeetha L. Sagar, Sudhir Pai Kasturi, Koen K.A. Van Rompay, Lars Hangartner, Andreas Wagner, Dennis R. Burton, William R. Schief, Shane Crotty, Darrell J. Irvine
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through August 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,826 | 83 |
| 564 | 31 | |
| Figure | 307 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 225 | 5 |
| Citation downloads | 56 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,978 | 119 |
| Total Views | 4,097 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)