Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (BBS), a ciliopathy characterized by obesity, hyperphagia, and learning deficits, arises from mutations in BBS genes. More exacerbated symptoms occur with mutations in genes encoding the BBSome, a complex regulating primary cilia function. We investigated the mechanisms underlying BBS-induced obesity using a novel BBS5 knockout (BBS5-/-) mouse model. BBS5-/- mice displayed hyperphagia, learning deficits, glucose/insulin intolerance, and disrupted metabolic hormones, phenocopying human BBS. They displayed an unique immunophenotype in white adipose tissue with increased proinflammatory macrophages and dysfunctional regulatory T cells, suggesting a distinct mechanism for adiposity compared to typical obesity models. Additionally, BBS5-/- mice exhibited pancreatic islet hyperplasia but failed to normalize blood glucose, suggesting defective insulin action. Hypothalamic transcriptomics revealed dysregulated endocrine signaling pathways with functional analyses confirming defects in insulin, leptin, and cholecystokinin (CCK) signalling, while preserving glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) responsiveness. Notably, treatment with a GLP-1R agonist effectively alleviated hyperphagia, body weight gain, improved glucose tolerance, and circulating metabolic hormones in BBS5-/- mice. This study establishes BBS5-/- mice as a valuable translational model of BBS to understand the pathogenesis and develop novel treatments. Our findings highlight the therapeutic potential of GLP-1R agonists for managing BBS-associated metabolic dysregulation, warranting further investigation for clinical application.
Arashdeep Singh, Naila Haq, Mingxin Yang, Shelby Luckey, Samira Mansouri, Martha Campbell-Thompson, Lei Jin, Sofia Christou-Savina, Guillaume de Lartigue
Usage data is cumulative from April 2025 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,955 | 0 |
311 | 0 | |
Supplemental data | 81 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 19 | 0 |
Totals | 2,366 | 0 |
Total Views | 2,366 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.