Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2025;135(9):e183607. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI183607.
Abstract
Umbilical cord blood (UCB) plays substantial roles in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation and regenerative medicine. UCB is usually cryopreserved for years before use. It remains unclear whether and how cryopreservation affects UCB function. We constructed a single-cell transcriptomics profile of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and mononuclear cells (MNCs) from fresh and cryopreserved UCB stored for 1, 5, 10, and 19 years. Compared with fresh UCB, cryopreserved HSCs and multipotent progenitors (MPPs) exhibited more active cell-cycle and lower expression levels of HSC and multipotent progenitor signature genes. Hematopoietic reconstitution of cryopreserved HSPCs gradually decreased during the first 5 years but stabilized thereafter, aligning with the negative correlation between clinical neutrophil engraftment and cryopreservation duration of UCB. Cryopreserved HSPCs also showed reduced megakaryocyte generation. In contrast, cryopreserved NK cells and T cells maintained a capacity for cytokine production and cytotoxicity comparable to that of fresh cells. Mechanistically, cryopreserved HSPCs exhibited elevated ROS, reduced ATP synthesis, and abnormal mitochondrial distribution, which collectively led to attenuated hematopoietic reconstitution. These effects could be ameliorated by sulforaphane (SF). Together, we elucidate the negative effect of cryopreservation on UCB HSPCs and identify SF as a mitigation strategy, broadening the temporal window and scope for clinical applications of cryopreserved UCB.
Authors
Yaojin Huang, Xiaowei Xie, Mengyao Liu, Yawen Zhang, Junye Yang, Wenling Yang, Yu Hu, Saibing Qi, Yahui Feng, Guojun Liu, Shihong Lu, Xuemei Peng, Jinhui Ye, Shihui Ma, Jiali Sun, Lu Wang, Linping Hu, Lin Wang, Xiaofan Zhu, Hui Cheng, Zimin Sun, Junren Chen, Fang Dong, Yingchi Zhang, Tao Cheng
Usage data is cumulative from March 2025 through July 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,576 | 225 |
| 610 | 78 | |
| Figure | 189 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 315 | 25 |
| Citation downloads | 46 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,736 | 328 |
| Total Views | 4,064 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)