Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) remains one of the most distressing adverse effects of cancer therapy. Yet, no therapy is available to selectively protect healthy hair follicles (HFs) and their epithelial stem cells (eHFSCs) from chemotherapy-induced damage without awarding potential survival benefits to cancer cells. Here, we report how human HFs can be protected against 2 lead CIA-inducing chemotherapeutics by inducing selective transient cell cycle arrest. Pretreating scalp HFs before chemotherapy exposure ex vivo with ALRN-6924, a clinical-stage “stapled peptide” drug that binds with high affinity to key endogenous inhibitors of p53, selectively activated p53 signaling only in cells with wild-type TP53 genotype and upregulated p21. This led to temporary cell cycle arrest in healthy tissues without protecting TP53-mutant cancer cells and mitigated chemotherapy-induced HF damage on multiple levels, including excessive hair matrix apoptosis, premature catagen, pigmentary abnormalities, “mitotic catastrophe,” and micronucleation. It also protected eHFSCs against DNA damage, apoptosis, and pathological epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Notably, even topically applied ALRN-6924 afforded relative chemotherapy protection ex vivo. These results provide proof of principle for a strategy to selectively protect rapidly proliferating healthy epithelial tissues and their stem cells in patients with TP53-mutant cancers, which promises to protect against acute and permanent CIA.
Jennifer Gherardini, Tara Samra, Tatiana Gomez-Gomez, Aysun Akhundlu, Samantha D. Verling, Kinga Linowiecka, Tongyu C. Wikramanayake, Ulrich Knie, Jose Rodríguez-Feliz, Ramtin Kassir, Wolfgang Funk, Reza P. Azar, D. Allen Annis, Manuel Aivado, Jérémy Chéret, Ralf Paus
Usage data is cumulative from May 2026 through May 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,066 | 0 |
| 386 | 0 | |
| Figure | 613 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 111 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 38 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,214 | 0 |
| Total Views | 2,214 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.