Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Feb 2023)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Stem cell factor stimulates neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo
Kunlin Jin, … , Lin Xie, David A. Greenberg
Kunlin Jin, … , Lin Xie, David A. Greenberg
Published August 1, 2002
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2002;110(3):311-319. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI15251.
View: Text | PDF
Article Genetics

Stem cell factor stimulates neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Research Article

Authors

Kunlin Jin, Xiao Ou Mao, Yunjuan Sun, Lin Xie, David A. Greenberg

×

Figure 5

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
SCF and FGF-2 stimulate BrdU incorporation in vitro. Treatment of normox...
SCF and FGF-2 stimulate BrdU incorporation in vitro. Treatment of normoxic cultures for 24 hours with SCF increased both the number of cells incorporating BrdU and the number of viable cells measured by MTT absorbance (a). FGF-2 also increased BrdU incorporation in these cultures (b), but the effects of maximally effective concentrations (10 ng/ml) of SCF and FGF-2 were not additive (c). Ab’s against SCF and FGF-2 each reduced the component of BrdU labeling stimulated by unfractionated HCM (all) by approximately 40%, but these effects were not additive (d). Anti-SCF and the combination of anti-SCF plus anti–FGF-2 (but not anti–FGF-2 alone) reduced BrdU labeling stimulated by the 30- to 50-kDa fraction of HCM by approximately 75%, consistent with the preferential localization of immunoreactive SCF to this fraction on Western blots. Anti–FGF-2 and the combination of anti–FGF-2 plus anti-SCF (but not anti-SCF alone) reduced BrdU labeling stimulated by the 10- to 30-kDa fraction of HCM by approximately 70%, consistent with the Mr value of 17.2 kDa for FGF-2. Data are mean ± SEM, n = 3, or representative blots from three experiments (inset to d). Asterisks in d indicate that the percentage of inhibition of BrdU labeling by a given Ab or combination of Ab’s is significantly different in that HCM fraction than in unfractionated HCM (P < 0.05; ANOVA and post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls tests).

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts