Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction
T.C. Stevenson Keller IV, Lillian Lim, Swapnil V. Shewale, Kendra McDaid, Íngrid Martí-Pàmies, Alan T. Tang, Carl Wittig, Andrea A. Guerrero, Stephanie Sterling, N. Adrian Leu, Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie, Phyllis A. Gimotty, Mark L. Kahn
T.C. Stevenson Keller IV, Lillian Lim, Swapnil V. Shewale, Kendra McDaid, Íngrid Martí-Pàmies, Alan T. Tang, Carl Wittig, Andrea A. Guerrero, Stephanie Sterling, N. Adrian Leu, Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie, Phyllis A. Gimotty, Mark L. Kahn
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cardiology Vascular biology

Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In recent decades, treatments for myocardial infarction (MI), such as stem and progenitor cell therapy, have attracted considerable scientific and clinical attention but failed to improve patient outcomes. These efforts indicate that more rigorous mechanistic and functional testing of potential MI therapies is required. Recent studies have suggested that augmenting post-MI lymphatic growth via VEGF-C administration improves cardiac function. However, the mechanisms underlying this proposed therapeutic approach remain vague and untested. To more rigorously test the role of lymphatic vessel growth after MI, we examined the post-MI cardiac function of mice in which lymphangiogenesis had been blocked genetically by pan-endothelial or lymphatic endothelial loss of the lymphangiogenic receptor VEGFR3 or global loss of the VEGF-C and VEGF-D ligands. The results obtained using all 3 genetic approaches were highly concordant and demonstrated that loss of lymphatic vessel growth did not impair left ventricular ejection fraction 2 weeks after MI in mice. We observed a trend toward excess fluid in the infarcted region of the left ventricle, but immune cell infiltration and clearance were unchanged with loss of expanded lymphatics. These studies refute the hypothesis that lymphangiogenesis contributes significantly to cardiac function after MI, and suggest that any effect of exogenous VEGF-C is likely to be mediated by nonlymphangiogenic mechanisms.

Authors

T.C. Stevenson Keller IV, Lillian Lim, Swapnil V. Shewale, Kendra McDaid, Íngrid Martí-Pàmies, Alan T. Tang, Carl Wittig, Andrea A. Guerrero, Stephanie Sterling, N. Adrian Leu, Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie, Phyllis A. Gimotty, Mark L. Kahn

×

Figure 2

Lymphatic endothelial cell–specific deletion of Flt4 severely reduces lymphangiogenesis in the infarct zone without affecting cardiac function.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Lymphatic endothelial cell–specific deletion of Flt4 severely reduces ly...
(A) Epicardial lymphatics in a Flt4fl/fl control heart were immunostained for LYVE1 (magenta) and VEGFR3 (orange). Live myocardium is highly autofluorescent (Auto, green) and cell nuclei are marked with DAPI (blue). Boxed region is shown at higher magnification on the right with individual LYVE1 and VEGFR3 channels. (B and C) Adjacent sections from the same infarct zone in a Flt4fl/fl animal 14 days after MI were examined using Masson’s trichrome stain (B) and immunostained for the lymphatic endothelial markers LYVE1 and PROX1 (C). The inset shows the boxed region in C at higher magnification. (D) Epicardial lymphatics in a Flt4fl/fl; Prox1-CreERT2 heart were immunostained for LYVE1 (magenta) and VEGFR3 (orange). Boxed region is shown at higher magnification on the right with individual LYVE1 and VEGFR3 channels. Note the loss of VEGFR3 protein detection on the LYVE1+ epicardial lymphatic. (E and F) Adjacent sections from the same infarct zone in a Flt4fl/fl; Prox1-CreERT2 heart 14 days after MI were examined using Masson’s trichrome stain (E) and immunostained for the lymphatic endothelial markers LYVE1 and PROX1 (F). The inset shows the boxed region in F at higher magnification. (G) The number of LYVE1+PROX1+ lymphatic endothelial cells was measured per mm2 in the infarct zone of the indicated animals (n = 3, 5). (H) Infarct size 14 days after MI was determined histologically for the Flt4fl/fl and Flt4fl/fl; Prox1-CreERT2 animals (n = 3, 5). (I–K) The cardiac functional parameters ejection fraction (I), end diastolic volume (J), and end systolic volume (K) were measured 14 days after MI in the indicated animals in a fully blinded manner (n = 6, 14). In B, C, E, and F, a dashed yellow line denotes the infarct border, “epi” denotes epicardial surface of the heart, “myo” denotes live myocardium, and “infarct” denotes infarct zone. Triangles represent female animals in H–K. Bar graphs represent mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons were made with a 2-tailed t test.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts