Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
NK cell receptor and ligand composition influences the clearance of SARS-CoV-2
Wan-Chen Hsieh, … , Yen-Tsung Huang, Shih-Yu Chen
Wan-Chen Hsieh, … , Yen-Tsung Huang, Shih-Yu Chen
Published November 1, 2021
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2021;131(21):e146408. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI146408.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

NK cell receptor and ligand composition influences the clearance of SARS-CoV-2

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

To explore how the immune system controls clearance of SARS-CoV-2, we used a single-cell, mass cytometry–based proteomics platform to profile the immune systems of 21 patients who had recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection without need for admission to an intensive care unit or for mechanical ventilation. We focused on receptors involved in interactions between immune cells and virus-infected cells. We found that the diversity of receptor repertoires on natural killer (NK) cells was negatively correlated with the viral clearance rate. In addition, NK subsets expressing the receptor DNAM1 were increased in patients who more rapidly recovered from infection. Ex vivo functional studies revealed that NK subpopulations with high DNAM1 expression had cytolytic activities in response to target cell stimulation. We also found that SARS-CoV-2 infection induced the expression of CD155 and nectin-4, ligands of DNAM1 and its paired coinhibitory receptor TIGIT, which counterbalanced the cytolytic activities of NK cells. Collectively, our results link the cytolytic immune responses of NK cells to the clearance of SARS-CoV-2 and show that the DNAM1 pathway modulates host-pathogen interactions during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors

Wan-Chen Hsieh, En-Yu Lai, Yu-Ting Liu, Yi-Fu Wang, Yi-Shiuan Tzeng, Lu Cui, Yun-Ju Lai, Hsiang-Chi Huang, Jia-Hsin Huang, Hung-Chih Ni, Dong-Yan Tsai, Jian-Jong Liang, Chun-Che Liao, Ya-Ting Lu, Laurence Jiang, Ming-Tsan Liu, Jann-Tay Wang, Sui-Yuan Chang, Chung-Yu Chen, Hsing-Chen Tsai, Yao-Ming Chang, Gerlinde Wernig, Chia-Wei Li, Kuo-I Lin, Yi-Ling Lin, Huai-Kuang Tsai, Yen-Tsung Huang, Shih-Yu Chen

×

Figure 1

SARS-CoV-2 clearance rate is associated with features of NK cells.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
SARS-CoV-2 clearance rate is associated with features of NK cells.
(A) U...
(A) Upper: Frequencies of top 100 marker combinations from Boolean gating over the 21 patient samples. Each column represents a specific marker combination. Orange, dark blue, and light gray indicate positive (1: marker intensity higher than the threshold [CD56dim]) and negative (0: marker intensity lower than the threshold [CD56dim]) for the indicated markers and CD56dim, respectively. Lower: Frequencies of the indicated marker combinations for each patient. (B) Upper: Viral clearance rate plotted versus the inverse Simpson index of receptor repertoire diversity. Circles, individual patients. Blue, male. Red, female. Blue line, linear regression; gray shading, 95% confidence interval (rank P = 0.042). Lower: Table of slopes and inverse Simpson indices for each patient. (C) Box-and-whisker plot of slopes for each patient in high (n = 11) and low (n = 10) NK diversity groups. Maximums, 75th, 50th, 25th percentiles, and minimums are 0.757, 0.633, 0.573, 0.229, and 0.184 for the high group and 2.40, 1.50, 0.96, 0.451, and –0.012 for the low group. P = 0.033 by linear regression of the binary NK diversity coefficient. (D) Abundances of NK cells with indicated characteristics visualized in tSNE maps color coded by cell density (yellow, high; purple, low). The number indicates the cluster ID of each FlowSOM metacluster. (E) Expression levels of indicated markers visualized in tSNE maps. (F) Frequencies of indicated clusters in individual patients versus the viral clearance (P = 0.0469, 0.0214, and 0.0012, for clusters 5, 6, and 12, respectively). (G) Heatmap of median arcsinh-transformed intensities of indicated markers in each metacluster. (H) Biaxial contour plots of TIGIT and DNAM1 from patients in fast (n = 11) and slow (n = 10) clearance groups. The numbers indicate the percentage of cells in each quadrant. (I) Box-and-whisker plot of frequencies of DNAM1hiTIGIThi cells in patients from slow and fast groups. Maximums, 75th, 50th, 25th percentiles, and minimums are 52.3, 48.28, 39.80, 30.13, and 19.70 for the slow group and 73.90, 62.80, 51.70, 38.80, and 30.40 for the fast group. P = 0.0114 by 1-tailed, unpaired Student’s t test.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts