Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Brain-specific repression of AMPKα1 alleviates pathophysiology in Alzheimer’s model mice
Helena R. Zimmermann, … , C. Dirk Keene, Tao Ma
Helena R. Zimmermann, … , C. Dirk Keene, Tao Ma
Published March 26, 2020
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2020;130(7):3511-3527. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI133982.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Aging Neuroscience

Brain-specific repression of AMPKα1 alleviates pathophysiology in Alzheimer’s model mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

AMPK is a key regulator at the molecular level for maintaining energy metabolism homeostasis. Mammalian AMPK is a heterotrimeric complex, and its catalytic α subunit exists in 2 isoforms: AMPKα1 and AMPKα2. Recent studies suggest a role of AMPKα overactivation in Alzheimer’s disease–associated (AD-associated) synaptic failure. However, whether AD-associated dementia can be improved by targeting AMPK remains unclear, and roles of AMPKα isoforms in AD pathophysiology are not understood. Here, we showed distinct disruption of hippocampal AMPKα isoform expression patterns in postmortem human AD patients and AD model mice. We further investigated the effects of brain- and isoform-specific AMPKα repression on AD pathophysiology. We found that repression of AMPKα1 alleviated cognitive deficits and synaptic failure displayed in 2 separate lines of AD model mice. In contrast, AMPKα2 suppression did not alter AD pathophysiology. Using unbiased mass spectrometry–based proteomics analysis, we identified distinct patterns of protein expression associated with specific AMPKα isoform suppression in AD model mice. Further, AD-associated hyperphosphorylation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) was blunted with selective AMPKα1 inhibition. Our findings reveal isoform-specific roles of AMPKα in AD pathophysiology, thus providing insights into potential therapeutic strategies for AD and related dementia syndromes.

Authors

Helena R. Zimmermann, Wenzhong Yang, Nicole P. Kasica, Xueyan Zhou, Xin Wang, Brenna C. Beckelman, Jingyun Lee, Cristina M. Furdui, C. Dirk Keene, Tao Ma

×

Figure 2

Brain-specific suppression of AMPKα1 alleviates learning and memory defects in Tg19959 AD model mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Brain-specific suppression of AMPKα1 alleviates learning and memory defe...
(A) Brain-specific genetic reduction of AMPKα1 and AMPKα2 in Tg19959 AD model mice. Noncongruous WT, Tg19959 (Tg), AMPKα1+/–/Tg19959 (α1/Tg), AMPKα2+/–/Tg19959 (α2/Tg). n = 10, 10, 6, 7; up to 3 technical replicates. For AMPK α1: WT versus Tg, *P = 0.0212; WT versus α2/Tg, **P = 0.0029; Tg versus α1/Tg, ***P = 0.0130; α1/Tg versus α2/Tg, #P = 0.0016. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test, F = 8.218. For AMPKα2: WT versus α2/Τg, ##P = 0.005; Tg versus α2/Tg, ###P = 0.043; α1/Tg versus α2/Tg, †P = 0.007. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. F = 7.585. (B) Representative H&E stain of hippocampal structure. n = 3. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) Percentage of time spent in the periphery for the OF test. n = 25, 21, 17, 14, 19, and 13. (D) Percentage of time spent with familiar (white) and novel (purple) objects in the NOR task during the testing phase. Preference of less than 50% indicates cognitive impairment. n = 19, 13, 10, 9, 10, and 8. Statistical preference for novel or familiar object: WT, *P < 0.0001; Tg, P = 0.5523; α1/cre, **P = 0.0004; α1/Tg, ***P = 0.0008; α2/cre, #P = 0.0465; α2/Tg, P = 0.1497, unpaired t test. (E) Escape latency (s) over 5 days of training in the hidden platform MWM. Four trials/day, 5 days. n = 19, 17, 13, 17, 19, and 13. WT versus α1/Tg, *P = 0.0256; Tg versus α1/Tg, **P = 0.0094; α1/Tg versus α2/Tg, ***P = 0.0009; ****P < 0.0001, 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. F = 18.16. (F) Percentage of time spent in the target quadrant during probe trial phase of MWM task. WT versus α2/Tg, *P = 0.0186; WT versus Tg, **P = 0.0027, 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. F = 4.525. Box-and-whisker plots represent the interquartile range, with the line across the box indicating the median. Whiskers show the highest and lowest values detected.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts