Michigan State University, Department of Food Science & Human Nutrition, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Address correspondence to: Sarah S. Comstock, 469 Wilson Road, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA. Phone: 517.353.3415; Email: email@example.com.
Published September 23, 2019 - More info
BACKGROUND In women with obesity, excess gestational weight gain (≥270 g/week) occurs in 2 out of 3 pregnancies and contributes to metabolic impairments in both mother and baby. To improve obstetrical care, objectively assessed information on energy balance is urgently needed. The objective of this study was to characterize determinants of gestational weight gain in women with obesity.METHODS This was a prospective, observational study of pregnant women with obesity. The primary outcome was energy intake calculated by the energy intake-balance method. Energy expenditure was measured by doubly labeled water and whole-room indirect calorimetry and body composition as a 3-compartment model by air displacement plethysmography and isotope dilution in early (13–16 weeks) and late (35–37 weeks) pregnancy.RESULTS In pregnant women with obesity (n = 54), recommended weight gain (n = 8, 15%) during the second and third trimesters was achieved when energy intake was 125 ± 52 kcal/d less than energy expenditure. In contrast, women with excess weight gain (67%) consumed 186 ± 29 kcal/d more than they expended (P < 0.001). Energy balance affected maternal adiposity (recommended: –2.5 ± 0.8 kg fat mass; excess: +2.2 ± 0.5; inadequate: –4.5 ± 0.5; P < 0.001) but not fetal growth. Weight gain was not related to demographics, activity, metabolic biomarkers, or diet quality. We estimated that energy intake requirements for recommended weight gain during the second and third trimesters were not increased as compared with energy requirements early in pregnancy (34 ± 53 kcal/d, P = 0.83).CONCLUSION We here provide what we believe are the first evidence-based recommendations for energy intake in pregnant women with obesity. Contrary to current recommendations, energy intake should not exceed energy expenditure.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01954342.FUNDING This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01DK099175) and the Clinical Research Cores at Pennington Biomedical Research Center (U54GM104940 and P30DK072476).
Jasper Most, Marshall St Amant, Daniel S. Hsia, Abby D. Altazan, Diana M. Thomas, L. Anne Gilmore, Porsha M. Vallo, Robbie A. Beyl, Eric Ravussin, Leanne M. Redman
Obesity during pregnancy is a major health problem in the United States. In this issue of the JCI, Most et al. fill an important gap in our understanding of energy homeostasis in pregnancy. The researchers measured energy intake, energy expenditure, and body composition in obese pregnant women. They demonstrated that energy intake need not increase in order for obese women to gain the recommended amounts of weight during pregnancy. Additionally, all of the gestational weight gain scenarios (inadequate, recommended, or excess) resulted in similar maternal and fetal perinatal outcomes. This evidence should guide new recommendations on this important topic.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines, set in 2009, recommended that women with obesity gain 11 to 20 pounds at a rate of 0.5 pounds/week during the second and third trimesters (1). Considering the need for personalized care and clinical judgment as well as placing an emphasis on adequate fetal growth, a 2013 committee opinion from The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) suggested that the IOM weight gain targets for obese pregnant women were too high (2). Numerous peer-reviewed studies have suggested that women with obesity should maintain or lose weight during pregnancy (3–6). Typically, these studies have been based on secondary data analyses of medical records or prospective cohort data that did not directly measure energy expenditure or body composition. In contrast, the Most et al. study used rigorous, objective methods to quantify energy expenditure and body composition of obese women at multiple time points during pregnancy (7). The methods employed — doubly labeled water and whole-room indirect calorimetry to measure energy expenditure, and air displacement plethysmography and isotope dilution to measure body composition — are gold standards in the field. Of the 54 women who completed the study, 18% gained below the current recommendation, 15% gained within the current recommendation, and 67% gained in excess of the current recommendation. Women who gained below the current recommendation had similar energy expenditure but consumed fewer calories, in both early and late pregnancy, compared with those who gained in excess of the current recommendation. However, there was large variability in energy balance. One participant was in negative energy balance by about 500 kcal/day, two others were in positive energy balance by about 500 kcal/day, with the remaining participants filling in all points in between. Only 25% of participants who gained within the current recommendation were in positive energy balance.
During pregnancy, the human body grows a placenta and a fetus, and generates amniotic fluid, fat stores, and blood. Further, the uterus and mammary glands increase in size. Resting energy expenditure contributes to a majority (up to 70%) of total daily energy expenditure and varies greatly from woman to woman (8, 9). As pregnancy progresses, the body begins to use fat for energy and becomes insulin resistant in order to provide glucose to the fetus (10). Often, additional energy intake and weight gain are required to support a pregnant woman and her developing infant. For instance, a lean woman without excess body fat will need additional energy intake to meet the high metabolic demand of pregnancy. However, in obese women the excess energy stored in adipose tissue can satisfy the metabolic demands of pregnancy. In some study populations, gestational weight gain is lower in women with high prepregnancy BMIs (11), whereas in others, excess gestational weight gain is common in women with obesity (12, 13).
Most et al. report that obese women do not need to ingest surplus calories in order to gain weight during pregnancy (7). In fact, the majority of participants in the study who gained within the 2009 IOM recommendation maintained a negative energy balance. Only women gaining in excess of the recommendation (36 of the 54 participants) accrued fat mass over the course of their pregnancy. The authors suggest that the conversion from fat mass to fat-free mass is efficient in pregnant women with obesity. This concept of metabolic efficiency during pregnancy is supported by prior research in normal weight and overweight pregnant women (8, 14), and implies that obese women who maintain their body weight could have a healthy pregnancy with appropriate fetal development so long as specific nutrient requirements are met. Importantly, although Most et al. showed that energy balance affected adiposity, fetal growth remained unaffected (7). Despite these results, prospective energy intake intervention trials, powered to detect intervention effects on weight gain and perinatal outcomes, are warranted. Most and colleagues suggest that such interventions should result in an approximately 100 kcal/d energy deficit in order to effectively keep weight gain within the current recommendation (11–20 lbs) or an approximately 10% energy deficit in order to achieve weight maintenance (7). Assessing the impact of fat localization such as on waist versus hip, and including obese women who have comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and severe anemia, are additional avenues worth examining.
While maintaining weight may provide the lowest risk for obese pregnant women, losing weight could prove detrimental to perinatal outcomes. Two recent systematic reviews summarizing the results of 6 or 18 cohort studies addressed the issue of gestational weight gain for obese pregnant women (15, 16). In one, the authors conclude that gestational weight loss results in an increased likelihood of small for gestational age (SGA) infants as well as low birth weight (15). Conversely, the other showed that weight gain below the current IOM recommendation, without weight loss, may optimize perinatal outcomes by decreasing macrosomia as well as maternal morbidities such as gestational hypertension and preeclampsia (16). There is also evidence that, in those with moderate to high-risk obesity (class 2 or 3), inadequate weight gain does not increase SGA risk (5, 7, 17). Indeed, a meta-analysis of data collected from cohorts in the U.S. and Europe found that the risk of adverse outcomes (preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, cesarean birth, preterm birth, and small or large for gestational age at birth) increased with BMI (regardless of BMI category) (18). Surprisingly, this risk was independent of gestational weight gain (18). A recent analysis of 12 million births using the United States Vital Statistics records compared outcomes from obese and ideal body weight pregnancies, and the results are striking (19). Negative maternal outcomes such as gestational hypertension and preeclampsia increase with gestational weight gain as well as obesity class. However, babies born to women with class 1 obesity who gained less than the recommended 11 pounds were slightly more likely to suffer from extremely low, very low, and low birth weight. Across the three obesity classes, the chance of infant macrosomia increased with gestational weight gain (19). Overall, this combined evidence suggests that the IOM recommendation for weight gain during pregnancy is too high for women with obesity, especially for those with class 2 or class 3 obesity (Table 1).
Total weight gain recommendations for pregnant women with obesity
Despite indications that maintaining weight without gain in obese pregnant women results in healthy outcomes, the IOM has recommended potentially excessive weight gains (1). In this case, the desire to avoid negative perinatal outcomes for infants (preterm birth, low birth weight, and SGA at birth) may result in negative maternal outcomes (preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, cesarean birth). This tightrope walk is not a simple balancing act, as both less-gain and more-gain result in different reductions in negative perinatal outcomes (19). In the case of less gain, the pregnant woman benefits slightly more. In the case of more gain, the infant benefits slightly. Many analyses show that weight gains within the IOM recommendation protect from preterm birth, low birth weight, and SGA, prioritizing an infant-centric model (6, 16, 18, 19). On the other hand, these analyses also report that weight gains below the IOM recommendations protect the mother/infant dyad from large for gestational age, macrosomia, cesarean birth, preeclampsia, and gestational hypertension, prioritizing a dyad-centric model (16, 19). In the decade since the IOM recommendations were made, the medical field has taken a renewed interest in minimizing maternal morbidity. Recommending weight gains lower than current values may not only serve present-day standards but also the pregnant women themselves.
Most et al. reported no differences in physical activity, diet quality, or eating behavior by weight gain category (inadequate, recommended, excess) (7). However, the study was not powered to detect such differences. Prior secondary data analyses also demonstrate that complications such as low birth weight were more likely when pregnant women did not gain the IOM recommended weight, but in these studies dietary nutritional composition as well as physical activity levels were often unknown. It is possible that optimizing nutrient intake without weight gain could result in a healthy pregnancy and decreased risk for both the pregnant woman and her infant, thereby supporting a maternal-infant dyad-centric model. Future studies should carefully consider nutrient value beyond caloric intake as well as physical activity when evaluating perinatal outcomes within the context of weight gain.
Whether or not federal agencies or other organizations adjust weight gain recommendations for pregnant women with obesity, the fact remains that the majority of women with obesity gain in excess of the 2009 IOM recommendation (19, 20). A striking 67% of women in the study by Most et al. gained in excess of the IOM recommendation, which is similar to that reported elsewhere (7, 20). Thus, a continued challenge will be identifying successful strategies to prevent excessive weight gain in pregnant women with obesity.
Conflict of interest: SSC is named as an inventor on the following patents or patent applications: Mammalian milk osteopontin for enhancing immune responsiveness (patent number: 9956283; May 1, 2018); Modulation of immune function by dietary bovine lactoferrin (publication number: 20150246100; September 3, 2015); and Nutritional formulations using human milk oligosaccharides for modulating inflammation (publication number: 20160256479; September 8, 2016).
Copyright: © 2019, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2019;129(11):4567–4569. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI131932.
See the related article at Evidence-based recommendations for energy intake in pregnant women with obesity.