To explore the interactions between insulin action and norepinephrine (NE) on blood pressure and muscle vascular resistance, we studied seven lean (66 +/- 1 kg) sensitive and seven age-matched obese (96 +/- 3 kg) insulin-resistant men after an overnight fast. Both groups were normotensive; however, the obese exhibited higher basal blood pressure, 90.8 +/- 2.2 vs. 83.4 +/- 1.6 mmHg, P < 0.04. Each subject was studied on two separate days during either saline (S) infusion or a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (I) achieving insulin concentrations of approximately 70 microU/ml. After 180 min of either S or I, NE was infused systemically at rates of approximately 50, 75, and 100 pg/kg per min. Glucose uptake was measured in whole body ([3-3H]glucose) and in leg by the balance technique. The results indicate: (a) the NE/pressor dose-response curve was decreased (shifted to the right) during I in lean but not in obese subjects, (b) I enhanced NE metabolic clearance by 20% in lean but not in obese, (c) NE decreases leg vascular resistance more in lean than in obese, and (d) NE causes a approximately 20% increase in insulin-mediated glucose uptake in both groups. In conclusion, insulin resistance of obesity is associated with an apparent augmented NE pressor sensitivity and decreased NE metabolic clearance. Both of these mechanisms can potentially contribute to the higher incidence of hypertension in obese man. Insulin resistance is likely to be a predisposing but not sufficient factor in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Because the obese group exhibited higher basal blood pressure, it is possible that our results reflect this difference. Further studies will be required to clarify this issue.
A D Baron, G Brechtel, A Johnson, N Fineberg, D P Henry, H O Steinberg
Usage data is cumulative from June 2025 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 341 | 31 |
| 92 | 5 | |
| Scanned page | 574 | 11 |
| Citation downloads | 112 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,119 | 47 |
| Total Views | 1,166 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.