Subcutaneous injection of the potent, nonselective opioid antagonist diprenorphine inhibits the vasopressin response to acute hypovolemia. To determine if this inhibition is due to antagonism of opioid receptors in brain pathways that mediate volume control, we determined the vasopressin response to different stimuli when diprenorphine or other opiates were injected into the cerebral ventricles, the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), or the lateral parabrachial nucleus (PBN) of rats. We found that the vasopressin response to hypovolemia was inhibited by injection of diprenorphine into the cerebral ventricles at a dose too low to be effective when given subcutaneously. This response also was inhibited when a 20-fold lower dose of diprenorphine was injected into the PBN but not when it was injected into the NTS. The inhibitory effect of diprenorphine in the PBN was not attributable to a decrease in osmotic or hypovolemic stimulation and did not occur with osmotic or hypotensive stimuli. Injecting the PBN with equimolar doses of the mu antagonist naloxone, the delta antagonist ICI-154,129 or the kappa-1 agonist U-50,488H had no effect on basal or volume-stimulated vasopressin. We conclude that the inhibition of vasopressin by diprenorphine is due partially to action at a novel class of opioid receptors that transmit volume stimuli through the PBN.
Y Iwasaki, M B Gaskill, R Fu, C B Saper, G L Robertson
Usage data is cumulative from March 2022 through March 2023.
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.