Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • By specialty
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews...
    • Mechanisms Underlying the Metabolic Syndrome (Oct 2019)
    • Reparative Immunology (Jul 2019)
    • Allergy (Apr 2019)
    • Biology of familial cancer predisposition syndromes (Feb 2019)
    • Mitochondrial dysfunction in disease (Aug 2018)
    • Lipid mediators of disease (Jul 2018)
    • Cellular senescence in human disease (Apr 2018)
    • View all review series...
  • Collections
    • Recently published
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Scientific Show Stoppers
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • Recently published
  • Brief Reports
  • Technical Advances
  • Commentaries
  • Editorials
  • Hindsight
  • Review series
  • Reviews
  • The Attending Physician
  • First Author Perspectives
  • Scientific Show Stoppers
  • Top read articles
  • Concise Communication
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a letter
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
  • Share this article
  • Need Help? E-mail the JCI
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI116457

Selective growth arrest and phenotypic reversion of prostate cancer cells in vitro by nontoxic pharmacological concentrations of phenylacetate.

D Samid, S Shack, and C E Myers

Clinical Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

Find articles by Samid, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Clinical Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

Find articles by Shack, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Clinical Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

Find articles by Myers, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

First published May 1, 1993 - More info

Published in Volume 91, Issue 5 on May 1, 1993
J Clin Invest. 1993;91(5):2288–2295. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI116457.
© 1993 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
First published May 1, 1993 - Version history
Abstract

Differentiation therapy may provide an alternative for treatment of cancers that do not respond to cytotoxic chemotherapy or hormonal manipulations. This hypothesis led us to evaluate the effect of a nontoxic differentiation inducer, sodium phenylacetate (NaPA), on hormone-refractory prostate cancer, the second most common cause of cancer deaths in men. NaPA treatment of androgen-independent PC3 and DU145 prostate cell lines, like that of hormone-responsive LNCaP cultures, resulted in dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation. Similar treatments were not significantly inhibitory to replicating normal endothelial cells and skin fibroblasts. In addition to the selective cytostatic effect, NaPA induced reversion of the prostatic cells to a nonmalignant phenotype, evidenced by their reduced invasiveness and loss of tumorigenicity in athymic mice. Phenotypic reversion was accompanied by alterations in gene expression, including selective reduction in tumor growth factor-beta 2 mRNA levels and increased amounts of class I major histocompatibility complex HLA transcripts. Furthermore, there was a decrease in tumor-associated proteolysis mediated by urokinase plasminogen activator, a molecular marker of disease progression in humans. When tumor cells were treated with NaPA together with suramin, a drug with demonstrable activity in patients, there was complete abrogation of cell growth under conditions in which each treatment alone produced only a partial effect. The in vitro antineoplastic activity was observed with drug concentrations that have been achieved in humans with no significant toxicities, suggesting that PA, used alone or in combination with other antitumor agents, warrants evaluation in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer.

Images.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 2288
page 2288
icon of scanned page 2289
page 2289
icon of scanned page 2290
page 2290
icon of scanned page 2291
page 2291
icon of scanned page 2292
page 2292
icon of scanned page 2293
page 2293
icon of scanned page 2294
page 2294
icon of scanned page 2295
page 2295
Version history
  • Version 1 (May 1, 1993): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a letter
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article
  • Share this article
  • Need Help? E-mail the JCI

Go to:

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement
Follow JCI:
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts