Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1992;89(4):1161-1165. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI115698.
Abstract
The destruction of pancreatic islet beta cells in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is thought to be T cell mediated. To directly identify islet-reactive T cells in asymptomatic, "preclinical" IDDM individuals with islet cell antibodies (ICA), proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was measured in the presence of sonicated fetal pig proislets. Stimulation indices (mean +/- SD) for [3H]thymidine uptake by PBMC cultured with sonicated proislets were: preclinical IDDM subjects (n = 22) 6.10 +/- 6.50, recent-onset IDDM subjects (n = 29) 3.66 +/- 3.35, Graves' disease subjects (n = 6) 2.17 +/- 0.93, scleroderma subjects (n = 4) 1.65 +/- 0.19 and normal control subjects (n = 14) 1.63 +/- 0.62. 68% (15/22) of preclinical IDDM, 41% (12/29) of recent-onset IDDM and 17% (1/6) of Graves' disease subjects had T cell reactivity greater than the mean + 2 SD of controls. T cell reactivity to proislets was tissue specific, and greater in magnitude and frequency than to human insulin. The majority of preclinical subjects with ICA greater than 20 Juvenile Diabetes Foundation (JDF) units (12/15, 80%) or antibodies to a 64-kD islet autoantigen (11/15, 73%) had significant T cell reactivity to proislets. ICA greater than 40 JDF units, a strong prognostic marker for progression to clinical IDDM, was an absolute index of T cell reactivity. Overall, the frequency of T cell reactivity in preclinical subjects, 68% (15/22), was comparable to that of ICA greater than 20 JDF units or 64-kD antibodies. Greater T cell reactivity to proislets in preclinical subjects accords with the natural history of autoimmune beta cell destruction. The direct assay of islet-reactive T cells in peripheral blood may have prognostic significance for the development of clinical IDDM and should facilitate identification of the primary target autoantigen(s).
Authors
L C Harrison, S X Chu, H J DeAizpurua, M Graham, M C Honeyman, P G Colman
Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through July 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 154 | 13 |
| 101 | 13 | |
| Scanned page | 216 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 68 | 0 |
| Totals | 539 | 28 |
| Total Views | 567 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)