The effects of chronic caffeine on the A1 adenosine receptor-adenylate cyclase system of rat cerebral cortical membranes were studied. Caffeine treatment significantly increased the number of A1 adenosine receptors as determined with the A1 adenosine receptor antagonist radioligand [3H]xanthine amine congener (XAC). R-PIA (agonist) competition curves constructed with [3H]XAC were most appropriately described by a two affinity state model in control membranes with a KH of 2.1 +/- 0.8 and a KL of 404 +/- 330 nM with 50 +/- 4% of receptors in the high affinity state (%RH). In contrast, in membranes from treated animals, there was a marked shift towards the high affinity state. In three of seven animals all of the receptors were shifted to a unique high affinity state which was indistinguishable from the KH observed in membranes from control animals. In four of seven animals the %RH increased from 50 to 69% with KH and KL indistinguishable from the control values. Thus, the agonist specific high affinity form of the receptor was enhanced following caffeine treatment. Maximal inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity in cerebral cortical membranes by R-PIA (1 microM) was significantly increased by 28% following caffeine treatment, consistent with an increased coupling of receptor-Gi protein with adenylate cyclase. Importantly, the quantity of Gi (alpha i) in rat cerebral cortex, determined by pertussis toxin-mediated labeling, was also increased to 133% of control values by this treatment. Thus, multiple components and interactions of the A1 adenosine receptor-adenylate cyclase complex are regulated by caffeine. These changes are likely compensatory measures to offset blockade of A1 receptors in vivo by caffeine and lead to a sensitization of this inhibitory receptor system.
V Ramkumar, J R Bumgarner, K A Jacobson, G L Stiles
Usage data is cumulative from September 2025 through September 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 470 | 25 |
| 171 | 3 | |
| Scanned page | 525 | 1 |
| Citation downloads | 219 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,385 | 29 |
| Total Views | 1,414 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.