The polymorphic Ia epitope recognized by monoclonal antibody 109d6 is detectable on the leukemic cells of a significantly increased number of individuals with acute myelogenous leukemia, compared with its frequency in normal healthy control individuals. In control individuals, the presence of the 109d6 epitope is closely correlated with but not identical to the DRw53 allo-specificity. However, the frequency of particular conventional Ia allodeterminants, including DRw53, is not significantly elevated in the leukemia group. Considerable evidence supports the conclusion that the high frequency of the 109d6 epitope reflects an inherited basis for susceptibility to the development of acute myelogenous leukemia and not a differentiation event occurring in the leukemic lineage. The 109d6 determinant is expressed by leukemic myeloblasts as well as by homologous normal B cells and monocytes obtained from the same individuals during remission of the leukemia. Furthermore, in healthy family members the 109d6 epitope is encoded by Ia haplotypes that are shared with the patient. Of special interest, certain of these haplotypes have combinations of the 109d6 epitope and Ia specificities not commonly seen in normal individuals; here, also, healthy family members share these haplotypes.
S Seremetis, J Cuttner, R Winchester
Usage data is cumulative from April 2023 through April 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 60 | 0 |
41 | 15 | |
Scanned page | 53 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 12 | 0 |
Totals | 166 | 15 |
Total Views | 181 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.