Ribonucleoprotein particles containing Sm antigen were separated from particles containing both Sm and RNP antigens by ion-exchange chromatography to study the recognition of these antigens by autoimmune sera. By using the separated antigens, anti-Sm and/or anti-RNP antibodies were detected in approximately 60% of sera from systemic lupus erythematosus patients by both enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoprecipitation of radiolabeled antigens followed by analysis on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. These antibodies were detected in 30% of the same sera using the standard passive hemagglutination technique. Competition experiments demonstrated that all of the sera tested that contained anti-Sm antibodies also had anti-RNP-like reactivity. This latter reactivity usually represented 80% or more of the total Sm and RNP binding activity in lupus sera. The binding to RNP-like determinants by several of the sera was uniquely resistant to treatment of the antigen with snake venom exonuclease. These studies indicate that humoral immunity against Sm and RNP antigens in systemic lupus erythematosus is directed primarily against a single type of ribonucleoprotein particle in which the two antigens are physically associated. The specific binding to a single type of ribonucleoprotein particle suggests that this particle may be especially immunogenic and that it might play an important role in induction of the humoral immune response to Sm and RNP.
W H Reeves, D E Fisher, R G Lahita, H G Kunkel
Usage data is cumulative from September 2021 through September 2022.
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.