Patients with glutaric aciduria (GA) have greatly increased urinary excretion of glutarate. Their leukocyte and fibroblast sonicates have deficient ability to produce 14CO2 from [1,5-14C]glutaryl-CoA, an enzymatic process with two sequential reaction steps, dehydrogenation and decarboxylation. In normal individuals, it is not known whether these two reaction steps require one or two enzymes, and currently it is assumed that a single enzyme, glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase (GDH), carries out these two reactions. Since GA patients also excrete increased amounts of 3-hydroxyglutarate and glutaconate in urine, it was thought that glutaryl-CoA in these patients may be dehydrogenated but not decarboxylated. We developed a new assay specific for glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenation which measures enzyme-catalyzed tritium release from [2,3,4-3H]glutaryl-CoA, and we studied the glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenating activity in cultured normal human fibroblasts and those from patients with GA. The Michaelis constant (Km) of normal human fibroblast GDH for [2,3,4-3H]glutaryl-CoA was 5.9 microM, and activity was severely inhibited by (methylenecyclopropyl)acetyl-CoA at low concentrations. Sonicates from all five GA fibroblast lines examined showed 2-9% of control glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenating activity, corresponding to the deficient 14CO2 releasing activity. These results indicate either that the conversion of glutaryl-CoA to crotonyl-CoA is accomplished by two enzymes, and patients with GA are deficient in the activity of the first component, or alternatively, that this process is carried out by a single enzyme which is deficient in these patients. It is unlikely that urinary glutaconate and 3-hydroxyglutarate in GA patients are produced via GDH.
D B Hyman, K Tanaka
Usage data is cumulative from June 2025 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 261 | 18 |
| 105 | 7 | |
| Scanned page | 452 | 4 |
| Citation downloads | 126 | 0 |
| Totals | 944 | 29 |
| Total Views | 973 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.