We studied the relationship between serum antibodies to the cross-reactive endotoxin core of Escherichia coli and survival following Pseudomonas aeruginosa septicemia. Core glycolipid was purified from the outer cell membrane of a uridine diphosphate galactose 4-epimerase-deficient rough mutant E. coli (J5 strain), characterized, and used as the antigen in a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure core-specific IgG and IgM antibodies. 43 patients with Pseudomonas septicemia, among whom there was a mortality of 42%, were evaluated. Core-specific antibody concentrations in acute sera ranged from 1 to 49 micrograms/ml in the case of IgG and from 1 to 200 micrograms/ml for IgM. Core-specific antibodies of both isotypes were higher in patients who survived compared with those who succumbed to their septicemias (mean, microgram/ml +/- SEM, 26 +/- 3 vs. 14 +/- 4, P = 0.005 for IgG, and 55 +/- 12 vs. 18 +/- 5, P = 0.009 for IgM). Although total IgG levels were also higher in acute sera from survivors compared with nonsurvivors (mean, mg/dl +/- SEM, 1,120 +/- 99 vs. 694 +/- 119, P = 0.004), total IgM levels were virtually identical in the two groups (146 +/- 23 vs. 148 +/- 48, P = 0.52). Conversely, patients with core-specific IgG levels greater than 10 micrograms/ml at the onset of septicemia had better survival than those with levels less than 10 micrograms/ml (79 vs. 14%, P less than 0.001), and patients with core-specific IgM levels greater than 30 micrograms/ml had better survival than those with levels less than 30 micrograms/ml (81 vs. 44%, P = 0.01). In comparison, patients with total IgG levels greater than 1,000 mg/dl also had better survival than those with levels less than 1,000 mg/dl (82 vs. 42%, P = 0.01), while those with total IgM levels greater than 150 mg/dl showed somewhat less improvement in survival compared with those with levels less than 150 mg/dl (71 vs. 50%, P = 0.12). Core-specific IgM was highly correlated with core-specific IgG (r = 0.52), but not with type-specific anti-lipopolysaccharide (r = 0.13) or anti-toxin A (r = 0.12) antibodies, or with total IgG (r = 0.28) or IgM (r = 0.31). In contrast, core-specific IgG correlated somewhat more closely with type-specific antibodies (r = 0.36), and with total IgG (r = 0.51) and IgM (r = 0.52). Stepwise linear discriminant analysis indicated that type-specific antibody levels were the best predictor of outcome, among those antibodies examined, followed by anti-core IgM. Although anti-core IgG, anti-toxin A, and total IgG levels all correlated individually with survival, none augmented the prognostic power of type-specific antibodies in combination with anti-core IgM, which together predicted outcome accurately 73.5% of the time. Host factors not significantly associated with anti-core antibody levels included rapidly fatal underlying disease, age, sex, leukopenia, and prior treatment with cytotoxic drugs. In contrast, prior steroid therapy was associated with low levels of both core-specific IgG and IgM (P < 0.05). These data suggest cross-protective activity against P. aeruginosa septicemia of naturally occurring antibodies to the endotoxin core of E. coli. Anti-core antibodies, particularly of the IgM isotype appear to augment the more specific protective immunity engendered by antibodies to the O-specific side chains of Pseudomonas lipopolysaccharides. This cross-protective immunity likely applies to other Gram-negative pathogens as well.
M Pollack, A I Huang, R K Prescott, L S Young, K W Hunter, D F Cruess, C M Tsai
Usage data is cumulative from June 2025 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 349 | 10 |
| 161 | 12 | |
| Scanned page | 533 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 141 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,184 | 25 |
| Total Views | 1,209 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.