Amiodarone was selectively perfused into the sinus node artery and atrioventricular node artery of 51 dogs. Amiodarone had an immediate negative chronotropic and dromotropic effect. Threshold concentration was 2.5 micrograms/ml. 25 and 50 micrograms/ml of amiodarone injected into the sinus node artery slowed the heart by 25.6 +/- 3.1 and 33.7 +/- 2.6 beats/min (mean +/- 1 SEM), respectively. Amiodarone 25 and 50 micrograms/ml injected into the AV node artery during AV junctional rhythm slowed the AV junctional pacemaker by 12.2 +/- 1.8 and 17.4 +/- 1.7 beats/min, respectively. Injections of amiodarone into the AV node artery during sinus rhythm regularly increased AV conduction time sometimes causing 2 degrees AV block at the highest concentration used. Impaired conduction was exclusively measured at the level of the A-H interval in the His electrogram. Neither atropine nor propranolol prevented the negative chronotropic effects of amiodarone. Amiodarone had no significant effect on sinus node response to either stellate stimulation or intranodal administration of norepinephrine. The negative chronotropic action of amiodarone was significantly enhanced when amiodarone was administered in a perfusate containing low (0.6 mM) instead of normal calcium. Taken collectively these observations indicate that amiodarone has immediate depressant electrophysiologic effects on both the sinus node and the AV junction and that these early effects might involve the blockade of the slow channel.
H O Gloor, F Urthaler, T N James
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 102 | 6 |
59 | 17 | |
Scanned page | 347 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 50 | 0 |
Totals | 558 | 26 |
Total Views | 584 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.