Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI110850

Comparison of glucosylated low density lipoprotein with methylated or cyclohexanedione-treated low density lipoprotein in the measurement of receptor-independent low density lipoprotein catabolism.

U P Steinbrecher, J L Witztum, Y A Kesaniemi, and R L Elam

Find articles by Steinbrecher, U. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Witztum, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Kesaniemi, Y. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Elam, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published April 1, 1983 - More info

Published in Volume 71, Issue 4 on April 1, 1983
J Clin Invest. 1983;71(4):960–964. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI110850.
© 1983 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published April 1, 1983 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

We previously showed that glucosylation of lysine residues of low density lipoproteins (LDL) blocks high-affinity degradation by cultured human fibroblasts, and markedly slows LDL turnover in guinea pigs. The present studies were done to evaluate glucosylated (GLC) LDL as a tracer of receptor-independent LDL catabolism, and to compare it with two other modified LDL, methylated (MET) LDL, and cyclohexanedione (CHD)-treated LDL, which have been used previously for this purpose. Glucosylation of LDL did not affect receptor-independent degradation in vivo, as the turnover of GLC-LDL and native LDL were similar in the LDL receptor-deficient, Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbit. Each modified radiolabeled LDL preparation was injected into eight guinea pigs, and fractional catabolic rates (FCR) determined. The FCR of GLC-LDL (0.024 +/- 0.005 h-1; SD) was similar to that of MET-LDL (0.023 +/- 0.006 h-1), and approximately 22% of that of native LDL (0.105 +/- 0.02 h-1). The FCR of CHD-LDL was greater than that of the other modified LDL, and it varied depending on how soon after preparation the CHD-LDL was injected: when used within 2 h of preparation, the mean FCR was 0.044 +/- 0.007 h-1 (n = 4); when used after overnight dialysis at 4 degrees C, the mean FCR was 0.082 +/- 0.03 h-1 (n = 4). This suggests that CHD-LDL overestimates the amount of LDL degraded by receptor-independent pathways, perhaps because the CHD modification is spontaneously reversible. The present studies indicate that GLC-LDL is a useful tracer of receptor-independent LDL catabolism in animals.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 960
page 960
icon of scanned page 961
page 961
icon of scanned page 962
page 962
icon of scanned page 963
page 963
icon of scanned page 964
page 964
Version history
  • Version 1 (April 1, 1983): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts