Resistance to infection with the multicellular parasite Schistosoma mansoni has been previously demonstrated to vary among several host species. The current investigation was designed to examine the basis for this species-related resistance in vitro. Adherent peritoneal macrophages or peripheral blood mononuclear cells from several species of host animals were incubated with S. mansoni schistosomula for 18-24 h; parasite viability was then assayed by methylene blue exclusion. Peritoneal exudate macrophages from susceptible species, such as mice (C57Bl/6) and hamsters killed, respectively, 6.6 +/- 2 and 8.0 +/- 2% of incubated schistosomula. In contrast, cells from resistant species: rats, guinea pigs, and rabbits, killed 21 +/- 2.3, 15 +/- 4.6, and 17 +/- 5.5%, respectively. Furthermore, blood monocytes from rabbits resulted in a mean of 25.9 +/- 2.8% dead organisms. Schistosomula killing by mononuclear phagocytes obtained from resistant species (rats or rabbits) was dependent on the cell/parasite ratio. Significant schistosomula mortality resulted from culture supernatants of rat macrophages or rabbit monocytes. Killing by cells from both species was significantly reduced upon addition of L-arginine, while catalase reduced killing only by rat macrophages. We conclude that mononuclear phagocytes may play a key role in species-related innate resistance to schistosomiasis; their in vitro schistosomulicidal activity parallels the known in vivo susceptibility of the donor species. Killing is mediated by lysosomal enzymes (arginase) and by products of oxidative metabolism, the predominant mechanism depends on the specific animal species.
C A Peck, M D Carpenter, A A Mahmoud
Usage data is cumulative from June 2025 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 237 | 8 |
| 119 | 2 | |
| Scanned page | 349 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 97 | 0 |
| Totals | 802 | 12 |
| Total Views | 814 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.