Usage Information
Abstract
Sera of 22 patients with active and 13 with inactive coccidioidomycosis, as well as 15 healthy subjects who were skin-test positive to coccidioidin and 39 healthy subjects who were coccidioidin skin-test negative, were assayed for immune complexes. Circulating immune complexes were measured by the Clq-binding assay, the Clq-solid phase assay, the monoclonal rheumatoid factor inhibition assay, and the monoclonal rheumatoid factor solid phase assay. An increased concentration of circulating immune complexes was detected in 73% of those with active disease by at least one assay compared with 13% of the healthy controls. Significantly increased levels of immune complexes were detected in sera of patients with active coccidioidomycosis by the Clq-binding assay (P < 0.001), the Clq-solid phase assay (P < 0.001), the monoclonal rheumatoid factor inhibition assay (P < 0.005), and the monoclonal rheumatoid solid phase assay (P < 0.05) compared with the results obtained in the 54 healthy subjects. In contrast, those with inactive disease did not show significantly increased concentrations of circulating immune complexes. Sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation of patients' sera established that the immune complexes were of intermediate size, sedimenting between the 6.6S and 19S markers. Immune complexes were shown to contain both coccidioidin antigen and anticoccidioidin antibody. In addition, a radioimmunoassay was developed to quantitate coccidioidin antigen-containing immune complexes. The latter assay proved highly sensitive in detecting immune complexes in patients with active coccidioidomycosis.
Authors
S Yoshinoya, R A Cox, R M Pope
Usage data is cumulative from September 2025 through September 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 262 | 4 |
| 156 | 3 | |
| Scanned page | 724 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 203 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,345 | 10 |
| Total Views | 1,355 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)