We measured the response to breathing a mixture of 80% helium and 20% oxygen (He) during a maximum expiratory flow-volume (MEFV) maneuver in 66 nonsmokers and 48 smokers, aged 17-67. All of the subjects studied had (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity [FEV1.0/FVC]) × 100 of greater than 70%. While the flow rates of the smokers were within ±2 SD of those of the nonsmokers at 50% VC (V̇max50), both groups showed a reduction in flow with age (nonsmokers: r=-0.34, P<0.01; smokers r=-0.52, P<0.001). Nonsmokers showed no significant reduction with age in response to breathing He, while smokers showed a marked reduction with age (r=-0.63, P<0.001 at V̇max50). We also measured the lung volume at which maximum expiratory flow (V̇max) while the subject was breathing He became equal to V̇max while he was breathing air, and expressed it as a percent of the VC. This was the most sensitive method of separating smokers from nonsmokers. These results indicate that the use of He during an MEFV maneuver affords sufficient sensitivity to enable detection of functional abnormalities in smokers at a stage when V̇max while they are breathing air is normal.
James Dosman, Frederick Bode, John Urbanetti, Richard Martin, Peter T. Macklem
Usage data is cumulative from September 2023 through September 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 181 | 0 |
122 | 29 | |
Scanned page | 452 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 37 | 0 |
Totals | 792 | 30 |
Total Views | 822 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.