Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI107552

Electrical Dose for Ventricular Defibrillation of Large and Small Animals Using Precordial Electrodes

L. A. Geddes, W. A. Tacker, J. P. Rosborough, A. G. Moore, and P. S. Cabler

Department of Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77025

Find articles by Geddes, L. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77025

Find articles by Tacker, W. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77025

Find articles by Rosborough, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77025

Find articles by Moore, A. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77025

Find articles by Cabler, P. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published January 1, 1974 - More info

Published in Volume 53, Issue 1 on January 1, 1974
J Clin Invest. 1974;53(1):310–319. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107552.
© 1974 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published January 1, 1974 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Electrical ventricular defibrillation of heavy subjects (over 100 kg body weight) is uncommon for the human or any animal species. This paper reports trans-chest ventricular defibrillation of subjects ranging in weight from 2.3 to 340 kg using conventional defibrillation current (heavily damped sine wave) of 0.3-30 ms duration. It was found that a body weight-to-electrical-shock strength relationship exists and can be expressed in terms of either electrical energy or peak current. For the duration of current pulse used clinically (3-10 ms), the relationship between energy requirement and body weight is expressed by the equation U = 0.73 W1.52, where U is the energy in W·s and W is the body weight in kilograms. The current relationship is I = 1.87 W0.88 where I is the peak current in amperes and W is the body weight in kilograms. The energy dose is somewhat more species and weight dependent and ranges from 0.5 to 10 W·s/kg (0.23-4.5 W·s/lb). The data obtained indicate that the peak current dose is virtually species and weight independent and is therefore a better indicator than energy for electrical defibrillation with precordial electrodes. In the duration range of 3-10 ms, the electrical dose is very nearly 1 A/kg of body weight (0.45 A/lb).

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 310
page 310
icon of scanned page 311
page 311
icon of scanned page 312
page 312
icon of scanned page 313
page 313
icon of scanned page 314
page 314
icon of scanned page 315
page 315
icon of scanned page 316
page 316
icon of scanned page 317
page 317
icon of scanned page 318
page 318
icon of scanned page 319
page 319
Version history
  • Version 1 (January 1, 1974): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts