Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Immune Environment in Glioblastoma (Feb 2023)
    • Korsmeyer Award 25th Anniversary Collection (Jan 2023)
    • Aging (Jul 2022)
    • Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicine (Jun 2022)
    • New Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Diseases (Mar 2022)
    • Immunometabolism (Jan 2022)
    • Circadian Rhythm (Oct 2021)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Research letters
    • Letters to the editor
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • In-Press Preview
  • Commentaries
  • Research letters
  • Letters to the editor
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Alerts
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Share this article
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI106893

Extent of Carotid Sinus Regulation of the Myocardial Contractile State in Conscious Dogs

Stephen F. Vatner, Charles B. Higgins, Dean Franklin, and Eugene Braunwald

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, California 92037

Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, California 92037

Find articles by Vatner, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, California 92037

Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, California 92037

Find articles by Higgins, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, California 92037

Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, California 92037

Find articles by Franklin, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, California 92037

Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, California 92037

Find articles by Braunwald, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Published April 1, 1972 - More info

Published in Volume 51, Issue 4 on April 1, 1972
J Clin Invest. 1972;51(4):995–1008. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106893.
© 1972 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published April 1, 1972 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

The effects of bilateral carotid artery occlusion (BCO) and carotid sinus nerve stimulation (CSNS) on left ventricular (LV) pressure (P), diameter (D), velocity of contraction (V), rate of change of pressure (dP/dt), and cardiac output were studied in conscious dogs instrumented with ultrasonic diameter gauges, miniature pressure gauges, and aortic electromagnetic flow transducers. The effects of BCO and CSNS were also studied after automatic blockade and were compared to similar alterations in pressure produced by norepinephrine, methoxamine, and nitroglycerin. When heart rate was maintained constant with atrial stimulation, BCO had little effect on ventricular contractility, increasing isolength systolic pressure (LV Piso) by 36% while isolength velocity of myocardial shortening (Viso) decreased by 12% and (dP/dt)/P fell by 8%. These effects could be explained largely by vasoconstriction, since elevating systolic pressure with methoxamine produced similar results, while norepinephrine increased Viso by 36% and (dP/dt)/P by 56%. CSNS produced directionally opposite results from BCO; it decreased Piso by 15%, Viso increased by 11%, while (dP/dt)/P remained almost constant. These effects may be explained largely by vasodilatation since reducing systolic pressure to the same level with nitroglycerin produced similar results. When peripheral vasoconstriction was minimized by phenoxybenzamine pretreatment. BCO produced a slight positive inotropic effect (Piso increased by 8%, Viso by 4%, and (dp/dt)/P by 10%), while CSNS produced a slight negative inotropic effect (Piso decreased by 3%, Viso decreased by 5%, and (dP/dt)/P by 7%).

Thus, in the normal, healthy, conscious dog, the carotid sinuses exert relatively little control of the inotropic state of the left ventricle; moreover, this small inotropic action is masked by the more powerful effects on peripheral resistance.

Images.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 995
page 995
icon of scanned page 996
page 996
icon of scanned page 997
page 997
icon of scanned page 998
page 998
icon of scanned page 999
page 999
icon of scanned page 1000
page 1000
icon of scanned page 1001
page 1001
icon of scanned page 1002
page 1002
icon of scanned page 1003
page 1003
icon of scanned page 1004
page 1004
icon of scanned page 1005
page 1005
icon of scanned page 1006
page 1006
icon of scanned page 1007
page 1007
icon of scanned page 1008
page 1008
Version history
  • Version 1 (April 1, 1972): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Share this article
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts