We investigated the effect of pyridoxine administration in three patients with homocystinuria due to cystathionine synthase deficiency. The drug decreased the plasma concentration and urinary excretion of methionine and homocystine and the urinary excretion of homolanthionine and the homocysteine-cysteine mixed disulfide. Urinary cystine rose somewhat. Oral methionine tolerance tests before and during the patients' response to pyridoxine indicated that during response they remained deficient in their capacity to convert the sulfur of methionine to inorganic sulfate, although this capacity increased somewhat. During pyridoxine response only, the methionine loads caused increased homocystinuria. There was no indication that pyridoxine stimulated an alternate pathway of metabolism. The values for specific activity of cystathionine synthase in liver biopsy specimens from two patients in pyridoxine response were 3 and 4% of the mean control value. When these patients were not receiving pyridoxine, comparable values were 2 and 1%, respectively. The hepatic enzyme activity of the mutant patients was similar to normal enzyme activity with respect to trypsin activation, heat inactivation, and stabilization by pyridoxal phosphate. Approximate estimates were made of the relation between total body capacity to metabolize methionine and hepatic cystathionine synthase activity. These estimates suggested that because of the large normal reserve capacity of cystathionine synthase, a few per cent residual activity is sufficient to metabolize the normal dietary load of methionine. Thus, small increases in residual capacity may be of major physiological importance. However, many liver biopsies would be required to establish unequivocally that such changes were due to the administration of a particular therapeutic agent rather than to biological variation. All the data in the present study are consistent with the interpretation that pyridoxine does act by causing an increase in residual cystathionine synthase activity.
S. Harvey Mudd, William A. Edwards, Peter M. Loeb, Michael S. Brown, Leonard Laster
Usage data is cumulative from September 2025 through September 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 351 | 21 |
| 208 | 13 | |
| Figure | 0 | 2 |
| Scanned page | 1,131 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 221 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,911 | 38 |
| Total Views | 1,949 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.