We measured the resistance of collateral channels, Rcol, in incomplete interlobar fissures in eight normal and eight emphysematous excised human lungs. Similar measurements were also made from the basal segments to the superior segment of the lower lobe in three normal and five emphysematous lungs. The lobe or segments were inflated through a bronchial cannula; air leaked through collateral channels and out of the other lobe or segment through a pneumotachograph which measured flow. Catheters inserted directly into the lung through the pleural surface on either side of the collateral channels measured the alveolar pressure difference producing collateral flow. Rcol is the ratio of this pressure difference to flow. By also measuring the inflating pressure and the airway pressure at the pneumotachograph, we calculated the lobar or segmental airway resistance, Raw. In the normal lungs Rcol varied inversely with lung volume and was higher on inflation than on deflation. Raw was very small compared to Rcol which ranged from 260 to 3300 cm H2O/liter per sec when the distending pressure was 20 cm H2O. In the emphysematous lungs on the other hand, Rcol was markedly decreased and ranged from 5 to 20 cm H2O/liters per sec at the same distending pressure and was less than Raw. We conclude that collateral channels are important ventilatory pathways in emphysema. When many units within a lung are ventilated by these pathways there may be disturbances of gas exchange and phase differences between normally and abnormally ventilated areas.
James C. Hogg, Peter T. Macklem, William M. Thurlbeck
Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through July 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 173 | 20 |
54 | 26 | |
Scanned page | 396 | 5 |
Citation downloads | 67 | 0 |
Totals | 690 | 51 |
Total Views | 741 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.