Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI105867

Hemodynamic effects after conversion of arrhythmias

Robert J. Corliss, David H. McKenna, Charles W. Crumpton, and George G. Rowe

Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Find articles by Corliss, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Find articles by McKenna, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Find articles by Crumpton, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Find articles by Rowe, G. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published August 1, 1968 - More info

Published in Volume 47, Issue 8 on August 1, 1968
J Clin Invest. 1968;47(8):1774–1786. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI105867.
© 1968 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published August 1, 1968 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Systemic and coronary hemodynamic parameters were determined during an arrhythmia and immediately after a direct current transthoracic shock given in an attempt to convert the arrhythmia to a sinus mechanism. No anesthesia or drugs were administered between the two studies. 16 patients with atrial fibrillation converted to sinus rhythm and five did not. In two patients with atrial flutter and one with supraventricular tachycardia, the arrhythmia was corrected. The arrhythmia persisted in a single patient with ventricular tachycardia. Utilizing each patient as his own control, we compared statistically various hemodynamic parameters before and after the shock. In addition, the group of patients whose atrial fibrillation terminated was compared to the group treated in the same manner but in which the atrial fibrillation persisted. Pressures in the right side of the heart decreased in both groups so that the changes appeared to be caused by factors associated with the transthoracic direct current shock or the catheterization procedure. The differences between those with atrial fibrillation who converted to sinus rhythm as compared to those who did not were a decrease in heart rate, an increase in stroke volume, and an increase in cardiac efficiency. There was no immediate effect on the cardiac output or coronary blood flow.

Images.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 1774
page 1774
icon of scanned page 1775
page 1775
icon of scanned page 1776
page 1776
icon of scanned page 1777
page 1777
icon of scanned page 1778
page 1778
icon of scanned page 1779
page 1779
icon of scanned page 1780
page 1780
icon of scanned page 1781
page 1781
icon of scanned page 1782
page 1782
icon of scanned page 1783
page 1783
icon of scanned page 1784
page 1784
icon of scanned page 1785
page 1785
icon of scanned page 1786
page 1786
Version history
  • Version 1 (August 1, 1968): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts