Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Comments for:

Cotargeting survival signaling pathways in cancer
Steven Grant
Steven Grant
Published August 21, 2008
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2008;118(9):3003-3006. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI36898.
View: Text | PDF | Erratum
Commentary

Cotargeting survival signaling pathways in cancer

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a component of a signaling pathway (PTEN/PI3K/AKT) that is frequently dysregulated in cancer. However, its precise relationship to the MAPK cascade (Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK), another pathway often implicated in tumorigenesis, has not been well defined. Recent evidence from tissue specimens obtained from patients who have received mTOR inhibitors suggests that ERK may be activated in response to mTOR interruption. In this issue of the JCI, Waugh Kinkade et al. and Carracedo et al. examine the relationship between these pathways in prostate and breast cancer cell model systems (see the related articles beginning on pages 3051 and 3065, respectively). Their findings suggest a link between inhibition of mTOR and ERK activation, possibly reflecting interruption of a novel negative S6K1-dependent feedback loop. Significantly, both groups observed that simultaneous inhibition of MEK/ERK and mTOR resulted in substantially enhanced antitumor effects both in vitro and in vivo. Together, these findings suggest that concurrent interruption of complementary signaling pathways warrants further investigation in cancer therapy.

Authors

Steven Grant

×

Strategies for cotargeting PI3K and mTOR signaling nodes in cancer

Submitter: David Fruman | dfruman@uci.edu

Authors: Matthew R. Janes, Michael G. Kharas

University of California, Irvine

Published September 4, 2008

Two recent papers in the Journal of Clinical Investigation described the importance of combined targeting of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and ERK MAPK pathways in cancer (1, 2). One of the rationales behind this strategy was that single targeting of mTOR complex-1 (mTORC1) using rapamycin or the analog RAD001 triggered a feedback loop that increased the activation of ERK, in vitro and in vivo (1). In an accompanying commentary, Steven Grant provided an insightful discussion of the importance of these findings as well as questions for future consideration (3). We would like to comment and expand upon one of these themes.

Dr. Grant writes, “a question arises concerning the optimal strategy to inhibit multicomponent pathways.” He then discusses the observation that in some settings the inhibition of mTORC1 triggers another feedback pathway leading to elevated activity of PI3K and AKT. In a separate recent paper in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, we reported a detailed investigation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling axis in a mouse model of BCR-ABL+ pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (4). We confirmed the existence of “oncogenic rebound” via rapamycin-induced AKT activation in this cancer model. We also showed that whereas AKT activity requires PI3K function, mTORC1 activity is largely independent of PI3K. To achieve both cell cycle arrest and death of the leukemia cells, it was necessary to inhibit both PI3K and mTORC1. Importantly, there are now small molecules that potently inhibit PI3K as well as mTOR, enzymes that are evolutionarily related. We used one of these compounds, PI-103, as proof-of-concept that dual inhibition of PI3K and mTOR with a single agent suppresses expansion of mouse leukemia cells in vivo and primary human CD34+CD19+ BCR-ABL+ cells in vitro. Another dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, BEZ235 (developed by Novartis), is in phase I clinical trials for solid tumors (5). Hence, readers should be aware that targeting multiple nodes in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway with single agents is a promising strategy for effective cancer suppression with surprisingly low toxicity in animals.

We would also like to note that we observed rapamycin-induced elevation in ERK phosphorylation in BCR-ABL+ leukemia cells (4). Furthermore, ERK phosphorylation was elevated in cells lacking PI3K function, and a MEK inhibitor reduced residual S6 kinase activity downstream of mTORC1. Hence, increased ERK activity might compensate for the loss of survival signals in these highly PI3K-addicted cells. These findings underscore the importance of investigating mechanisms that lead to feedback activation of ERK signaling in both solid and hematopoietic malignancies.

References

  1. Carracedo, A., et al. 2008. Inhibition of mTORC1 leads to MAPK pathway activation through a PI3K-dependent feedback loop in human cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 118: 3065–3074.
    View this article via: JCI.org CrossRef
  2. Kinkade, C.W., et al. 2008. Targeting AKT/mTOR and ERK MAPK signaling inhibits hormone-refractory prostate cancer in a preclinical mouse model. J. Clin. Invest. 118: 3051–3064. JCI.org CrossRef
  3. Grant, S. 2008. Cotargeting survival signaling pathways in cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 118: 3003–3006.
    View this article via: JCI.org CrossRef
  4. Kharas, M.G., et al. 2008. Ablation of PI3K blocks BCR-ABL leukemogenesis in mice, and a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor prevents expansion of human BCR-ABL leukemia cells. J. Clin. Invest. 118: 3038–3050.
    View this article via: JCI.org CrossRef
  5. Maira, S.M., et al. 2008. Identification and characterization of NVP-BEZ235, a new orally available dual phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor with potent in vivo antitumor activity. Mol. Cancer Ther. 7:1851–1863.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts